BritishGuy54
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2020
- Messages
- 773
I wouldn’t say that they don’t play the game. Because they do. But I think it comes down to different priorities + the Switch’s and Ultimate’s success + the fear of losing their favourite characters.No shade, but I feel like a lot of the people who want Smash to keep building on Ultimate and propping up the "everyone is here!" shtick for the rest of eternity don't actually play the game.
Now hear me out, I know it sounds weird. But a lot of them seem to straight up not care at all about the game's mechanics, modes, graphics, and any content aside from the roster of playable characters. They're here for the Internet hype, but disregard anything aside from the crossover aspect of Smash.
It's just dawned on me that—especially after Ultimate—a lot of people treat Smash as a cultural phenomenon rather than... a video game.
I imagine the next game would be a shock for the ‘hype’ crowd as there may be less third parties and legacy characters this time around.
I also think that Ultimate’s successor just isn’t going to be as commercially successful as Ultimate. It doesn’t matter what route they take (Ultimate Deluxe, traditional sequel, full reboot), there will be a drop-off from Ultimate.
I think the best way to view Smash is like a time capsule. The games tend to be really good at looking back at the previous generation of the consoles, compared to the current system.
Melee for N64, Brawl for GC and GBA, 3DS/Wii U for the Wii/DS, and Ultimate for the 3DS and Wii U (Ultimate was lucky enough to play catch-up with its DLC).
Perhaps the next game will focus more on what the Switch (and early Switch 2) brought us, as I think there is still a lot to showcase in Smash.