Cosmic77
Smash Hero
Since this is Zippo, I'll take it all with a grain of salt.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
not necessarily, I do feel like they could still at least reveal the ARMS rep in their own solely focused presentation ala Byleth, assuming production on them is still running pretty smoothlyWhelp guess we won't know the ARMS rep and possibility FP7 until July now.
Another 10+ weeks it is!
I'm okay with that.not necessarily, I do feel like they could still at least reveal the ARMS rep in their own separate presentation ala Byleth
FP7 and any other Nintendo announcement though? Yeah, I ain't holding my breath.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't E3 be the June direct? If so then it would mean that they will bow out.If by next week Nintendo comes out and state they won't be able to put a presentation together in time for June, I wonder what the plan for their would be E3 line up is gonna be? The only known first party games with dates are Xenoblade and Clubhouse Games and both of those are out by early June.
I mean, people can claim whatever they want, but it doesn't make it less relevant. A better working relationship can always mean better potential for future collaborations. A good working relationship isn't a smoking gun that absolutely implies a character is coming, but it's another important piece of evidence to consider when looking at which characters have more favorable paths towards inclusion in Smash. I mean, we literally saw this play out with how Microsoft and Nintendo collaborating and working with one another resulted in Banjo & Kazooie just recently with Minecraft on Wii U being a key element that helped establish and then subsequently develop that relationship.My concern is that people could claim that a bunch of companies have a good working relationship with Nintendo, especially if it can be used to prop up a character that they want to see in Smash.
It's like that comment that Sakurai made about how it's more important for a character to be fun to play as over them being recognizable (or something along those lines - I don't remember the exact quote), where it's a concept that can be twisted to fit whoever someone supports.
Zippo is hit or miss. Mostly miss, actually. But all things considered I wouldn’t be surprised by it just horribly disappointed. But I understand.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/675397060731863085/705241486400159744/gfgdgdfgsd.JPG
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/675397060731863085/705241485251182672/fsdfsdfsfgd.JPG
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/675397060731863085/705241487436152872/fdsfsdfsdg.JPG
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/675397060731863085/705241482600382472/fdfsdgdfbdfb.JPG
Very likely related to those Jeff tweets.
From yours truly, back in February.Can I mention how amazing it is that this guy Zippo, whom nobody had heard about until a few weeks ago, suddenly became an "insider" due to resetera "verifying" him or some **** despite having no track record, got Byleth completely wrong, people kept believing him anyway, now gets another thing wrong, putting his score at 0/2, and we are probably still going to talk about him in the future?
I know E3 is cancelled, but E3 time is a sacred gamer holiday.I know Sabi isn't really reliable, but they are teasing that we might be getting at least articles from major news outlets reporting on Nintendo not having a June direct.
The ARMS fighter and FP7 can easily be done in a Sakurai presentation, which requires a lot less work then a Nintendo Direct does, which needs trailers for at least a dozen or so games from both third and first party and that is not mentioning all of the editing and production work require to all together which probably takes a few good weeks inside an actual studio to put together.I know E3 is cancelled, but E3 time is a sacred gamer holiday.
Nintendo already said that Spring Man's gonna be revealed and released in June, and that's the perfect time to announce FP7.
Are we sure this isn't just Sabi on an alt account?Zippo doesn't bother me so much as the fact that by resetera's own standards he should be banned by now, and whenever someone brings up his poor track record and dubious reliability he flips out as if someone is libelling him instead of raising counterpoints based on precedent.
Though that doesn't mean he's inherently uninformed.
Well it ain’t June so...
Vergeben or his source also usually takes their time checking in on stuff
Edit: also also he probably won’t get anything back anyways since the developers are quarantined and outside talk is more limited than ever before.
I should point out an important factor here: some countries (China, Korea etc.) have returned to work. This is relevant in the case of Tencent (Nintendo's partner in China): A couple of their employees leaked Nintendo-related stuff last year (relating to the Chinese Switch and its specs). Those leaks weren't 100 % iron-clad, but pretty accurate to boot. Tencent's corporate web is also vast (includes not just Riot, but also Ubisoft, A-B and Epic through minority shares as well as SNK and Platinum indirectly.): meaning that a leak coming from that direction could theoretically hint at any of the first four.Also, if working from home actually prevents leaks from happening, I'll be thrilled about it. I'd rather be completely surprised (or completely disappointed lol) than to go into this pack with full list of leaks.
OTOH, it wouldn't surprise me if Nintendo had the groundwork for an E3 presentation or something like that planned before the cancellations and shutdowns. They probably negotiated for the trailers already, so letting the finished ones go to waste seems rather counter-productive.The ARMS fighter and FP7 can easily be done in a Sakurai presentation, which requires a lot less work then a Nintendo Direct does, which needs trailers for at least a dozen or so games from both third and first party and that is not mentioning all of the editing and production work require to all together which probably takes a few good weeks inside an actual studio to put together.
The ARMS fighter maybe but not too sure with FP7 at this point given everything said...The ARMS fighter and FP7 can easily be done in a Sakurai presentation, which requires a lot less work then a Nintendo Direct does, which needs trailers for at least a dozen or so games from both third and first party and that is not mentioning all of the editing and production work require to all together which probably takes a few good weeks inside an actual studio to put together.
It isn't a question of maybe, if we get a Sakurai presentation, the ARMS character will be getting revealed there unless Sakurai turns into a streamer which is beside the point and neither here nor there tbfThe ARMS fighter maybe but not too sure with FP7 at this point given everything said...
not sure this joke makes sense because I just woke up but resetera is the type of place that would verify a can of dog food if they thought it was a legit leak for a gameZippo doesn't bother me so much as the fact that by resetera's own standards he should be banned by now, and whenever someone brings up his poor track record and dubious reliability he flips out as if someone is libelling him instead of raising counterpoints based on precedent.
Though that doesn't mean he's inherently uninformed.
Sabi's copying other popular leaks? Are they also posting it in a vaguely worded way so they can claim they were right if the June direct does happen?I know Sabi isn't really reliable, but they are teasing that we might be getting at least articles from major news outlets reporting on Nintendo not having a June direct.
That's really sad news. Sabi is beyond desperate for attention again.
Ironically enough it is quite vaguely worded and it also straight after someone who has a bit of validity said it. Who else but Sabi?
I think the content Terry brought was something of an exception as he does star in his own company crossover franchise along with Fatal Fury. It's a pretty unique situation and it seems unlikely that any other character will randomly bring meaningful content from other franchises owned by the same company unless we get another PAC-MAN like characters who naturally references different series.Master Chief could work very well since he’s the Xbox’s mascot. I’d just hope he’d have a similar amount of Content to Terry since Halo easily has enough music/characters & deserves that focus. But he could bring over content from Gears of War, Fable, Forza, Crackdown & some of the Rare content that Banjo should’ve had like Perfect Dark, Killer Instinct, Battletoads & Conker.
Doom Slayer would be a good choice too. He could represent iD Software’s legendary library with Commander Keen, Wolfenstein & Quake.
If the theme is Mario and Sonic, what's the purpose of other characters?What do you guys think of this being Crash's Classic Mode?
First Round:; Stage: Pac-Land
Second Round:; Stage: Shadow Moses Island
Third Round:; Stage: Wily's Castle
Fourth Round:; Stage: Midgar
Fifth Round:; Stage: Green Hill Zone
Sixth Round:; Stage: Mushroom Kingdom
Bonus Round
Final Round: Master Hand & Crazy Hand
The idea here is revolving around mascots given Crash's rivalry with Mario and Sonic notably in the 90's.
Thx Sabi, very helpful as usual...
I think we could do better than that. How about a classic route that has Crash fighting against opponents that spin or roll? Maybe make a small reference to Crash Twinsanity where he fights two opponents who are good and evil like Crash and Cortex? Maybe Crash teams up with another bad guy?What do you guys think of this being Crash's Classic Mode?
First Round:; Stage: Pac-Land
Second Round:; Stage: Shadow Moses Island
Third Round:; Stage: Wily's Castle
Fourth Round:; Stage: Midgar
Fifth Round:; Stage: Green Hill Zone
Sixth Round:; Stage: Mushroom Kingdom
Bonus Round
Final Round: Master Hand & Crazy Hand
The idea here is revolving around mascots given Crash's rivalry with Mario and Sonic notably in the 90's.
Technically he didn't get Byleth wrong, it's just for some ****ing reason, he did not know Byleth was from Fire Emblem / Fire Emblem was a 1st Party Nintendo IPFrom yours truly, back in February.
So July or August then are our next bets?So I guess it’s confirmed now
So I guess it’s confirmed now
There was a problem fetching the tweet
Uh huh. I guess the other seven Fire Emblem characters already in Smash didn't tip him off. Honest mistake.Technically he didn't get Byleth wrong, it's just for some ****ing reason, he did not know Byleth was from Fire Emblem / Fire Emblem was a 1st Party Nintendo IP
Because people know whether it's 1st or 2nd party entirely?Uh huh. I guess the other seven Fire Emblem characters already in Smash didn't tip him off. Honest mistake.
Still, I do sort of agree that it doesn't instill much confidence if the Nintendo franchise that people have been complaining about for having too many reps gets another character and Zippo believes that F5 is closely associated with Nintendo but not first-party.Because people know whether it's 1st or 2nd party entirely?
That's not something that inherently tips people off. Combined with 2nd party being extremely confusing as hell, they might've just thought it was 2nd party, and not 1st party.
Reality is people don't know those little details very well. And they did know of a Fire Emblem character to begin with, they just thought it was 2nd party, not 1st party.
This isn't some oddity. This makes a ton of logical sense since copyrights can be very confusing. People have mistaken Bayonetta for 2nd party because Nintendo is supporting the series. So no, I'm not buying your point since it assumes everybody knows everything. It's just a leaker who admitted they didn't do good research. Zippo wasn't actually wrong, because that's not how sources work. Let's remember that sources can be confusing, no matter what information they have. Them having information isn't the same as them knowing how to present the information perfectly. One of Verge's sources didn't even know if Isabelle was an echo or clone. Didn't mean the information was wrong, just wasn't sure on every details.
Now the real question is what Zippo actually got wrong via his sources, not a simple misunderstanding of who owns the IP specifically. Also, see what I said about how 2nd and 1st party is confusing. Sometimes I can't even remember the actual difference at this point. It's so arbitrary it hurts. 3rd party is at least clear for a series. A 3rd party developer can still develop a 1st party IP too, as well. Gets confusing, doesn't it? About how it all works? Exactly. Them being confused is... actually really damn normal these days.
The video is just raw, unedited footage of Sakurai at his house sitting on his couch and playing the character. The Mii Costume segment is just him going though the Mii Fighter menu.Even if there's no direct in June, we could maybe see a Arms presentation with release in June.
The gameplay is recorded using a 2008 video camera facing the screen, while Sakurai uses the built-in mic from a Brawl development laptop for audio.The video is just raw, unedited footage of Sakurai at his house sitting on his couch and playing the character. The Mii Costume segment is just him going though the Mii Fighter menu.
"Second party" isn't a real thing, at least as far as ownership is concerned. Fire Emblem and Byleth are owned by Nintendo; Intelligent Systems and Koei-Tecmo don't even factor in here. And the exact wording Mr. leaker used was "The character is not from Nintendo, but from a series related to Nintendo", so you can't even blame confusion due to Koei's involvement with 3 Houses.Because people know whether it's 1st or 2nd party entirely?
That's not something that inherently tips people off. Combined with 2nd party being extremely confusing as hell, they might've just thought it was 2nd party, and not 1st party.
Reality is people don't know those little details very well. And they did know of a Fire Emblem character to begin with, they just thought it was 2nd party, not 1st party.
This isn't some oddity. This makes a ton of logical sense since copyrights can be very confusing. People have mistaken Bayonetta for 2nd party because Nintendo is supporting the series. So no, I'm not buying your point since it assumes everybody knows everything. It's just a leaker who admitted they didn't do good research. Zippo wasn't actually wrong, because that's not how sources work. Let's remember that sources can be confusing, no matter what information they have. Them having information isn't the same as them knowing how to present the information perfectly. One of Verge's sources didn't even know if Isabelle was an echo or clone. Didn't mean the information was wrong, just wasn't sure on every details.
Now the real question is what Zippo actually got wrong via his sources, not a simple misunderstanding of who owns the IP specifically. Also, see what I said about how 2nd and 1st party is confusing. Sometimes I can't even remember the actual difference at this point. It's so arbitrary it hurts. 3rd party is at least clear for a series. A 3rd party developer can still develop a 1st party IP too, as well. Gets confusing, doesn't it? About how it all works? Exactly. Them being confused is... actually really damn normal these days.