- Joined
- Aug 13, 2001
- Messages
- 34,401
- Location
- Cull Hazard
- NNID
- Irene4
- 3DS FC
- 1203-9265-8784
- Switch FC
- SW-7567-8572-3791
That isn't the point. People don't know the difference between 1st and 2nd party because it's extremely arbitrary.Still, I do sort of agree that it doesn't instill much confidence if the Nintendo franchise that people have been complaining about for having too many reps gets another character and Zippo believes that F5 is closely associated with Nintendo but not first-party.
If this was a new franchise I might be more understanding, but FE has been in Smash since Melee. Not knowing it's first-party after four Smash games is pretty bad if you want to be involved with Smash leaks.
He can only go off of what his source says. So he did poor research on who owns Fire Emblem. He isn't wrong about who it is either in the end. Knowing the character isn't the same as knowing who directly owns them. There can be other odd details from his source that made it confusing.
Let's not forget Verge's source at one point couldn't explain jack-all either(they completely gave a poor wording that makes it sound like a ton of companies were not Challenger Pack 5 when they meant these certain characters are). In addition to that, don't forget when you leak information in public, you're given certain instructions of what to say. Zippo knowing FE is 1st party doesn't inherently matter if he had to word it more vaguely or wasn't allowed to leak it at all.
Things aren't that black and white. I feel Zippo outright deserves the benefit of the doubt since they weren't really wrong as much as people are saying he is.
No, I can blame confusion on poor communication. It happens too often. I am not buying whatsoever Zippo was lying/creating false information. I am hard giving him the benefit of the doubt here because people still think 2nd party is a thing. And that's the point, it's confusing yet people still use it. Hell, people still use the poor term of "4th party", which doesn't exist. Also second party does actually exist, it's just arbitrary and pointless."Second party" isn't a real thing, at least as far as ownership is concerned. Fire Emblem and Byleth are owned by Nintendo; Intelligent Systems and Koei-Tecmo don't even factor in here. And the exact wording Mr. leaker used was "The character is not from Nintendo, but from a series related to Nintendo", so you can't even blame confusion due to Koei's involvement with 3 Houses.
It's funny that a few days ago you had people feverishly discussing that nobody should complain about not knowing characters because you can just google them, but a leaker, whose entire "job" is about getting things right, can get away with not doing a simple check on Wikipedia to confirm that Fire Emblem is, indeed, a Nintendo series.
Also at they knew it was a Fire Emblem character all along, they just didn't say it until after the fact. A true classic.
Last edited: