snowgolem
Smash Lord
It’s okay. I’d just prefer if we change the subject to something more positive, but people are still talking about it soSorry about starting the whole Fire Emblem argument.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It’s okay. I’d just prefer if we change the subject to something more positive, but people are still talking about it soSorry about starting the whole Fire Emblem argument.
I feel like if we get another trailer in the K. Rool/Banjo style, it’ll be for Dixie Kong, since that focus was more on Rare characters than Microsoft specifically.Ideal direct on 26th:
Starts in the DK house where Banjo was revealed. Everybody is vibing, with Banjo now in the mix. Then they hear explosions and etc-ish sounds outside. They all rush to the hole where the window was, Banjo breaking it further. They look up to see a silhouette of Master Chief. *intense zoom-in* But wait- it’s actually Steve! Steve gameplay etc etc. Shows Steve beating the heck out of Banjo. Cut back to trailer. Steve is standing at the top of a bunch of game ended fighters, being the triumphant icon of gaming. But then he gets vibe checked by Master Chief. Splash screen and then trailer ends right there. It doesn’t need anything else.
Incalculable. I could see it happening if they were waiting for E3 to make their first reveal.So, what do you think the chances are we don't get a Smash reveal in the (allegedly) upcoming Direct?
Fairly strong. They can easily save FP 6 for E3 (or what's left of it) and also tease FP 7. The wait would be super long, but eh. Doubt they careSo, what do you think the chances are we don't get a Smash reveal in the (allegedly) upcoming Direct?
Daaaamn, I'm a nobody? That's a shame...nobody really wanted Incineroar in the first place.
I'm pretty sure that it's a common overgeneralization, a lot of Smash fans are just quietly enjoying the game, they don't care much about 'franchise representation' and stuff like that. Sure, unsatisfied people are sometimes pretty loud about what they don't like but they're not representing the whole community, i mean most people here are pretty chill for example. Of course it's all a matter of perspective but most Smash fans i know (me included) have roughly two types of reaction in regards to newcomers:I swear Smash fans are just ungrateful, entitled and spoiled whiny people always hating Fire Emblem and throwing salty tantrums like a manchild over characters getting into Smash instead of many popular and requested characters they always whinging and demanding for. Oh and don't forget them blaming poor Sakurai when a character they want doesn't get in. (No offense.)
Initially I was banking on them not showing anything until e3, but that update on the physical fighter pass for the 23rd makes me think that we'll get a reveal with little to no gameplay.So, what do you think the chances are we don't get a Smash reveal in the (allegedly) upcoming Direct?
I wonder what your Heartless looks like...I feel like the Fire Emblem hate stems from the timing of those characters' releases rather than who the actual character is, but who cares, I'm pretty sure everyone expected a Three Houses character would get in anyway, it just came sooner than expected.
Daaaamn, I'm a nobody? That's a shame...
I know why FE has so many characters. FE is a game series about characters.Okay so since it’s on topic. The main two arguments I see about FE are
-“Fire Emblem is over represented.”
-“Fire Emblem characters are all the same.”
For the first argument, Mario and Pokémon both have more. And it makes sense since Mario, Pokémon, and Fire Emblem are Nintendo’s biggest franchises. It makes perfect sense.
For the second argument, I can’t exactly disagree, but the people who hate on FE certainly do. Chrom is wanted and celebrated for being a clone, and when we get just one more Fire Emblem character (who is 10x more unique than Chrom) and everybody freaks out.
This community makes no sense.
Good music list, but it has a glaring omission for me, which is Temporal Tower. I would love to see a Smash remix of that song.I know I sound like a broken record at this point, but I think there's a good chance for a PMD rep. This week would've been the perfect chance to have a spirit event, but they did one for Ring Fit. It gets especially weirder when you consider how quick they were with the SWSH spirits, which happened within a week of it's release. Grovyle seems the most logical choice (he's the main character of the most popular game in the series, that's why they chose ) but I guess Gengar or Gardevoir are possible.
A Smash reveal has been one of my predictions for the next Direct (which of course is apparently coming on the 26th), but the chances of no reveal might've gone down a bit after the physical card release being slated for the 23rd.So, what do you think the chances are we don't get a Smash reveal in the (allegedly) upcoming Direct?
I have never seen or heard a better analysis of super smash bros. And I agree with just about everything you said. In the end, Smash Bros is just a game. I don’t know if poetic is the right word but if it is then this post is very much soI know why FE has so many characters. FE is a game series about characters.
Compare this to, say, Zelda - a game about items (which a lot of people think of when you think of Zelda.)
A lot of Zelda items are represented in items you can use in-game, like the Bombchus and the Fairy.
This is because Zelda doesn't have as many important characters as most RPGs, due to it's story and such.
I suppose this kind of explains Hero's alts. Sakurai likes the idea of the heroes you play as in other games fighting! Even if you've not played, say, Three Houses, or Dragon Quest III, or Final Fantasy VII, or Xenoblade Chronicles - the people who did can have the main character, who fought and grew alongside them as their stories unfolded and changed - and see this character in a glorious render, sometimes for the first time - see this character fighting against the icons of the gaming world! For them, it's the next leg of an adventure. The experience of a traditional RPG is a lot more personal than people realise!
Besides, I don't really think that characters alone act as representation, and nor does Sakurai.
After all, we don't have a playable DS stylus (or something to that effect) but we do have the Pictochat stage - and I can't think of an Electroplankton character off the top of my head, nor can I see a rep from 1080 Snowboarding getting in Smash any time soon (but it would be pretty cool to fight as a snowboarder, not gonna lie), or characters from other games that are still represented otherwise- like how Sakurai drew so much attention to the guest SNK characters in the background of the KoF Stadium?
The thing is, the issue of representation is actually a lot larger than people seem to realise. It's not just characters, it's Mii Costumes, stages, music, spirits, references, cameos, items, assist trophies - the list goes on, and that's what makes Smash amazing. The fact that it has so many references and such - even if not as playable characters - is still a glorious testament to the history of gaming, let alone the history of Nintendo. So what if there's a lot of 'anime swordsmen?' Each of them does bring something unique, as large or small as it may be - and just because some people don't like it, doesn't mean no-one does. There are people out there who are happy about Byleth, about Lucina being playable, even if some people might not agree with that - and that's okay!
At the end of the day, Smash may be a celebration, but more than anything it's a game, and we all know that the reason Sakurai works himself almost to death is because he wants us, the players, the fans, to enjoy his game. It's nothing more. He doesn't have a secret agenda, or a ploy to brainwash us all to become Fire Emblem fans or something. He's really a gamer, just like us - but he's in a position where he can make one, with any of the characters in the world, and he's been running with this dream for over 20 years. This man's passion, his joy, is ours to share and enjoy. For the sake of the man who pours his heart and soul into everything he does, can we just stop for a moment and see how far his dream has come?
your in for a wait bud at least till Monday Tuesday at leastGoodnight everyone. Let’s hope I wake up to an indies direct announcement
Who said I was waking up tomorrowyour in for a wait bud at least till Monday Tuesday at least
Also Piranha Plant was shown after showing Isaac, Shadow, ARMS, Rex, Chibi Robo, Geno, and Skull Kid will not have a future in Ultimate. Many fan favorites deconfirm from Ultimate yet Piranha Plant of all things not only got in but was sold for $5.You gotta remember with Piranha Plant and Incineroar, the backlash wasn't really due to "ugh, not another Mario/Pokemon character". PP has been possibly the most out-of-left-field, wtf choice so far, and those are always divisive at best.
The series with the most characters will always be the target of criticism and complaints, regardless of whether or not it's actually deserved.FE hate always seemed pretty proportional to how much stuff it got in Smash to me. It was fine in Melee and Brawl, complaints started popping up in 4 and they've really hit their zenith with Ultimate DLC. It's not rocket science. Then again neither is the idea of relativity (like FE having RELATIVELY more representation than what the franchise deserves compared to Pokemon and Mario) but plenty of people just see numbers and get confused why Video Game Mickey Mouse and the world's biggest media franchise have lots of characters in a crossover game made by the owners of Video Game Mickey Mouse and partial owners of world's biggest media franchise.
Oh so you got one of those cryopods? Can I have one??Who said I was waking up tomorrow
NO, DON'T DO IT! YOU HAVE SO MUCH TO LIVE FOR!!!!Who said I was waking up tomorrow
You know people are 100% allowed to not like everything in Smash Bros. Just because Sakurai adds something doesn't mean everyone has to get behind and praise the character he made. Now that character are being sold separately does make the complaints a bad character addition more valid. You don't have to be grateful for a product that doesn't suit your taste.I swear Smash fans are just ungrateful, entitled and spoiled whiny people always hating Fire Emblem and throwing salty tantrums like a manchild over characters getting into Smash instead of many popular and requested characters they always whinging and demanding for. Oh and don't forget them blaming poor Sakurai when a character they want doesn't get in. (No offense.)
1. You compare the amount Fire Emblem to amount of Mario and Pokemon but there's a huge difference, and that's the Fighters themselves. Many Fire Emblem characters not only look similar but plays similar as well. Many Fire Emblem characters are very similar to each other; Marth & Roy are extremely similar to each other and they also Echo Fighters as well (so you have 4 characters that are clones of one character), majority of them have counters, three of them have charging neutral specials, and a lot of them have the same aesthetics (all use swords and five have blue hair). Meanwhile just about every single Pokemon rep not only look different but plays different. Mario, Peach, Bowser, Rosalina, Bowser Jr, and Piranha Plant all play completely different as well.Okay so since it’s on topic. The main two arguments I see about FE are
-“Fire Emblem is over represented.”
-“Fire Emblem characters are all the same.”
For the first argument, Mario and Pokémon both have more. And it makes sense since Mario, Pokémon, and Fire Emblem are Nintendo’s biggest franchises. It makes perfect sense.
For the second argument, I can’t exactly disagree, but the people who hate on FE certainly do. Chrom is wanted and celebrated for being a clone, and when we get just one more Fire Emblem character (who is 10x more unique than Chrom) and everybody freaks out.
This community makes no sense.
Yeah oversaturation complaints are totally a bias thing. That's why you see more **** for it in Fire Emblem than Pokemon or Mario--people have more experience with the latter. Everybody's played a Mario and Pokemon game by now since they've been around since the 80s and 90s, but not everybody's played a Fire Emblem game, which only hit it big outside Japan starting Smash 4. And Hell some people just don't give a crap about Pokemon or Mario.The series with the most characters will always be the target of criticism and complaints, regardless of whether or not it's actually deserved.
I know Mario and Pokemon aren't always at the top of everyone's lists, but is it really that infuriating that Nintendo's two most successful franchises, the games that almost everyone grew up with and probably play to this day, have the most characters on the roster? Is there another franchise that deserves to have more than either of those two, or are people upset because the less popular franchises that they hold dear aren't getting as much attention?
People say it's the clones that are the biggest issue people have. But that's the opposite, really. I mean, the most drastic reactions were to who? Not Chrom or Roy or Lucina. People shrugged those off. They were to Corrin and Byleth, original characters. And it wasn't on the basis of them being "bad" characters, it was on the basis of volume: "another FE character".Honestly, I feel like most people don't even understand why they hate Fire Emblem.
I know they'll say its because of 'too many swords' or 'too much compared to other IPs'.
I think what is actually annoying to people is something a bit more obvious.
Its too many clones of a single character. If we didn't have Roy, Lucina, and Chrom all based off of Marth, we'd be fine. If they were more original, we'd be okay.
Beyond that, I also think that a lot of the hate stems from others being essentially told to hate the series representation.
I've been playing fighting games for years, so playing Terry with his inputs just comes naturally to me.In comparison, I'm not a fan of most of the "bars" used for other characters. Terry's 100%, Little Mac's punch, Banjo's feathers, even Lucario's aura boost, they're all original takes, but I personally don't like those things much.
Yes. And?I swear Smash fans are just ungrateful, entitled and spoiled whiny people always hating Fire Emblem and throwing salty tantrums like a manchild over characters getting into Smash instead of many popular and requested characters they always whinging and demanding for.
That sounds a lot like what Shulk does, no? Or you'd prefer a more permanent change of stance? Because he's a fairly quick character that kinda goes into the Iaido style you're also mentioning.I really want a quirk revolving around art, I also would really like to see a weapon stance character able to change weapons similar to how Pokemon Trainer switches Pokemon.
Also a character that stores power in their blade the more damage they inflict on the fighter, and release it. I know Cloud does this, but I'd want someone who can do that with the Iaido swordstyle (but with a better recovery than Cloud.) Until someone like that comes along Cloud will have to do.
Other than that I personally want characters with a fast, quick, nimble gamestyle, who can get in an enemy's face, deal damage and get out; dodging the enemy's attacks, and repeat the process again like Sheik.
Just SD, he still has three stocks.im sorry to inform you all but mario got coronavirus and now all the smash characters are in self-quarentine and no newcomers are getting in until after the coronavirus outbreak
Or maybe it's because the Mario and Pokemon reps are more unique when compare to the Fire Emblem reps. Also you got the major problem with Corrin and Byleth who were decided solely for marketing reason.Yeah oversaturation complaints are totally a bias thing. That's why you see more **** for it in Fire Emblem than Pokemon or Mario--people have more experience with the latter. Everybody's played a Mario and Pokemon game by now since they've been around since the 80s and 90s, but not everybody's played a Fire Emblem game, which only hit it big outside Japan starting Smash 4. And Hell some people just don't give a crap about Pokemon or Mario.
Though I have seen people who really focus on the crossover aspect of Ultimate and would rather just see smaller represented series get their day (Zelda or Xenoblade) or BIG 3rd party series make it in (Master Chief or 2B) over what's already in. Can't blame them, especially the latter, because this photo looks amazing
View attachment 265697
FE has a lot of characters in Smash because the series has a lot of characters.
I say this as someone who does venture onto other platforms which discuss Smash: it's truly a Smashboards-exclusive anomaly that thinking Fire Emblem has a disproportionate amount of characters results in people thinking you're biased against the series.Yeah oversaturation complaints are totally a bias thing. That's why you see more **** for it in Fire Emblem than Pokemon or Mario--people have more experience with the latter. Everybody's played a Mario and Pokemon game by now since they've been around since the 80s and 90s, but not everybody's played a Fire Emblem game, which only hit it big outside Japan starting Smash 4. And Hell some people just don't give a crap about Pokemon or Mario.
Though I have seen people who really focus on the crossover aspect of Ultimate and would rather just see smaller represented series get their day (Zelda or Xenoblade) or BIG 3rd party series make it in (Master Chief or 2B) over what's already in. Can't blame them, especially the latter, because this photo looks amazing
View attachment 265697
Because those franchises are 10x more popular than FE. Two of gaming's largest franchises, synonymous with gaming itself, and the very core of Nintendo's success.Playing devil's advocate, if overrepresentation is the root of the issue, why is it that Mario characters and Pokemon characters are generally better accepted?
So...that really *****y thing you did for the entirety of the previous pass...you're just planning to do it all over again this pass?There are two things that I only care for Smash news in this Direct. One, if the first fighter is female, that's gonna save me for the rest of the pass since I got a single character represented. Otherwise, my advocacy is off to a bad start
I think most people understand that very few resources are spent making those clones. And the only thing you would have got instead of them is...other clones.I mean, the most drastic reactions were to who? Not Chrom or Roy or Lucina. People shrugged those off. They were to Corrin and Byleth, original characters. And it wasn't on the basis of them being "bad" characters, it was on the basis of volume: "another FE character".
Don Genie gets in Smash and becomes both heaviest and fastest character in the game. seriously that guy was so hard to beat on cosmic terminal.
You didn't include the rest of my comment which said that FE probably wouldn't have half as many characters as it does now if every game featured Marth as the main character.