As promised, I would be looking through evidences. Since I've never done this before, I'm going to be doing a similar method to what ChibiCat is doing.
Basically, if you make a good post, you get one point. If you make a scummy post, you lose one point. This can go into negatives. If you have no points, you are neutral. If your overall score is in the + range, you are an townie. If your overall score is in the - range, you are a scum. The one with the lowest overall point receives my vote. I'll be doing this from member to member, so it won't go in chronlogical order. Also because I think it'll be an more organized way of doing this:
Clownbot
Post #50
Clownbot said:
Everyone who isn't a monk or mason will probably just claim Vanilla Townie, so...
I like the idea of this discussion as a means to get us out of RVS, though. (That's what we're trying to do, right?
)
Unvote
Post #51
Clownbot said:
Also, wouldn't people who claim monk/mason have a better chance of being night killed?
Those are very good logic and ideas there.
+1 Clownbot
Post #63
Clownbot said:
We have time, Wiz. Forcing a lynch without much to go on isn't a very good idea in forum Mafia, even on D1 information can be gathered to get a viable lynch candidate.
I actually do agree with you on this.
+1 Clownbot
Post #114
Clownbot said:
Also, right now there are only, like, three people who are confirmed Town as far as I care. Some of us should really post more.
This. I was guilty of this until my computer got working again.
1+ Clownbot
Post #178
Clownbot said:
Thinking that anyone with their vote on Wiz should Unvote. Give whoever replaces him some time to catch up and contribute, Wizzerd probably wasn't the play toDay anyway.
This was an very good idea you proposed. We can't let the new players get lynched just because a susipicous player drops less then twenty-four hour before a lynch.
+1 Clownbot.
RocketPSIence
Post #19
RocketPSIence said:
Clown, what do you hope to accomplish on the first day by immediately voting for someone?
That was during the Random Voting Stage, so you can't really blame him. If you were in his shoes, I wouldn't be surprise if you did the same thing as well.
-1 RocketPSIence
Post #46
RocketPSIence said:
So after the random voting stage, what do we do?
Uh, actually attempt to find some evidences? Wasn't that obvious?
-1 RocketPSIence
Post #52
RocketPSIence said:
Yeah, forcing people to give up their roles seems scummy to me.
Just what I was thinking.
+1 RocketPSIence
Post #122
RocketPSIence said:
I really think that having to just make an obligatory post in 48 hours is generally in bad taste.
FOS: Wizzerd
Really good logic there.
+1 RocketPSIence
Post #145
RocketPSIence said:
@Kevin, I really haven't had much time in the past few days. I have very little stuff in there right now b/c my life is hectic. I'm working on a longer post right now with my thoughts in it.
Then where is the big post you were talking about?
-1 RocketPSIence
Post #188
RocketPSIence said:
It's because I don't really know what kind of questions to ask >.>
Then think of something.
-1 RocketPSIence
Post #237
RocketPSIence said:
2) Guus calling me out was simply a band wagon vote and then him going "oh well, I get this feeling about RocketPSIence." I've also was demonstrating how easy it was for someone to come up with something on someone to start a case. WHICH NO ONE SEEMS TO WANT TO DO. Instead tunneling in on me seems like a good idea. WHICH IS WHAT FORCED TO ME TO REVEAL MY POSITION AS A POWER ROLE IN THE LAST GAME.
All that yelling was totally unecessary. Also, where in the Smash Bros. Mafia game did you reveil your role? I've read through the entire thread and I could not find anything regarding you reveiling your role.
-2 RocketPSIence
Post #239
RocketPSIence said:
I'd also like to state, that I got royally screwed by the fact that the scum characters switched out to possibly avoid suspicion.
That could be an good reason and it is understandable.
+1 RocketPSIence
Frown
Post #39
Frown said:
Vote: Frown
Because I MIGHT BE THE TRICKSTER!
You just made yourself look like an idiot.
-1 Frown.
Post #79
Frown said:
Guys... small number of posts ≠ likely mafia. Just telling.
Actually, it can help raise susipicons, so your logic is flawed.
-1 Frown.
guus
Post #57
guus said:
A roleclaim on day one. Wow that's a pretty desperate attempt to get out of RVS. What could you possibly gain with claiming roles? Do you expect mafia/werewolves to claim that they are? They will just claim Vanilla townie ._.
I agree. Roleclaiming should only be used as a last resort to save themself.
+1 Guus
Post #132
guus said:
I don't have any real leads, so I'm going to vote the person off that hasn't added information, and most likely won't later in the game. It makes no sense to keep him around and instead lynch a pretty active player which COULD be scum, only supported by a little bit of evidence and mostly metagaming. I don't mean to lynch a player who will give no information at all after his lynch.
At this rate, lots of information has been added, so you might as well find a good lead now.
-1 Guus
Post #152
guus said:
Townies can still play very anti-town, he adds no info at all either. That's really what I want to see as a lynch the first day. Scum can't be dumb enough to be clear to lynch already.
That is true and I can't argue with that.
+1 Guus
Post #155
guus said:
I can't tell who is scummy and who's not, just pure speculation.
You should be able to find some informations now. There are over 200 posts worth of information to look at.
-1 Guus
Post #205
guus said:
"11) If a majority has not been reached, then No Lynch is forced as the lynch target."
I want a lynch to happen, so Unvote, Vote RocketPSIence"
Try not to follow bandwagons when we're out of the Random Voting Stages. Trust me, you don't want to be the center of attention when you poorly make important decisions.
-1 Guus
Sworddancer.
Post #72
Sworddancer. said:
I'm sorry, Frown, but not posting seems to me like you're trying to lay low. I know I'm making an inference based on little evidence, but as of now it's the most evidence that I have for telling who's scum.
Very good, people who tend not to post are likely scums. Therefore, they should be eliminated first, according to guus.
+1 Sworddancer.
Post #104
Sworddancer. said:
Guys, the way to find evidence is by posting a lot and pressuring people when they look suspicious. When someone doesn't post, it makes them look suspicious. Thus I'm putting pressure on said people who look suspicious to me to see if I can get any leads.
That is an very good idea there. I'll consider using it in the next Mafia game I'm joining (Not including the other one I'm in)
+1 Sworddancer.
Nothing KevinM said really interested me, but he was acting a bit goofy, which makes me a little susipicous of him.
-1 KevinM
No research will be done on Tom due to his absent.
Nothing really particularly interest me of McFox, but he has made some solid posts in this thread.
+1 McFox
Mayling
Post #133
Mayling said:
I did a reread to try and see what I could find. It took us too long and struggled to get out of RVS, which hurt us. Though, I want to warn everyone that we have somewhere around 36 hours to get a lynch.
All I can say is that I'm glad we're out of the RVS stage. At least we have cold hard evidence to prove now.
In case the deadline hasn't gone through, let's hope this will finish off Day 1.
+1 Mayling
Some points I want to make:
Clownbot and Sworddancer. (Yes, the username does have a period) have been extremely helpful and beneficial to this case.
RocketPSIence had a bad beginning, an decent middle, and a poor ending.
Frown is useless.
guss was mixed until a little slip at the end.
As of now:
Clownbot: 4
RocketPSIence: -3
Frown: -2
Guus: -1
Sworddancer.: 2
KevinM: -1
Tom: 0
McFox: 1
Mayling: 1
Unvote
I
Vote: RocketPSIence for lynch.
However,
FOS: Frown, KevinM, and guss.
Basically my thoughts for now.
)
