Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
what makes you say this?
Swordd said:
Guys, don't downplay or apologize for your votes. It kind of takes the "oomph" out of them, you know what I mean?Clown said:
This is interesting to me. I knew the activity was starting to drop off, which is why I posed that question in the first place. I figured it'd be an easy question to answer, it wasn't a trick or anything, as sometimes a massclaim on D1 is viable (here I don't actually think it is), and just wanted to gather opinions. There was sort of no wrong answer, is my point. The fact that he chose not to answer and has still not answered even a few days later is telling.Clown said:
Well, keep in mind that Frown hasn't answered yet, either, but the fact that Twilt could of answered a lot earlier and didn't has convinced me.
True, but I would like to see him answer Mayling's question.SSBF said:
If you think statistically, no person is LIKELY to be mafia.
The problem with this way of thinking is that if mafia decides to coast, and we stick to finding proof and/or holes in peoples' stories (which the mafia does not have, since they are coasting), then we'll keep killing townies while they slide to victory for doing nothing. This happened in my first-ever game of mafia, where pretty much everyone went inactive, and the last mafia member literally stopped posting for the last few Days of the game. The townies kept killing each other off while the mafia member did nothing and just watched them self-destruct. If you want to see this for yourself, check out Left4Scum, in which Cello did this very thing.
Out of context, this sounds like you were in another game with TWILT where he was scum. If he was, did he win or lose the game? Has how TWILT has been acting in this game align with or is it different from how he played the last game? If you aren't sure, please reread TWILT's posts so far (there haven't been that many) and give me your impressions.Clownbot said:
Rocket said:
Wait wha? By saying "defend your position" you imply that you have a differing position. And yet in your very next post you vote steel for no reason (almost) immediately on D1. What changed between when you asked Clown why he did it and you doing the very same thing?
Textbook OMGUS*, but I'm inclined to believe this is a n00btell rather than a scumtell for now.TWILT said:
While like I said, a massclaim isn't actually good for this game right now, you seem to be implying here that a massclaim could never be beneficial, because scum won't claim that they're scum. But like Tom explained, if both werewolves are gone, and we do a massclaim then, then we will have two cleared townies which we know not to lynch (assuming our two monks haven't already died or whatever). Claiming can be beneficial in some cases.Guus said:
Anti-town post. Doubly so. First, if nothing's going on, it's your job as town (if you are town) to make something happen. You have plenty of options; for instance, there's a list of names in the OP of this thread. Pick one at random (that isn't you, obviously) and start pushing a case on them. This will spur activity (at least on their part, and hopefully on the part of others) and help move the game forward.Wizzerd said:
Who would you categorize as "useless" right now?Guus said:
Ignores it completely, could be skimming, another scumtell. (Skimming is a scumtell because scum don't have to pay as much attention to the thread as townies. Since they already know who they are, as long as they don't see someone pushing for their lynch, it isn't AS important for them to pay attention the to thread. I'm generalizing here, and there are times where townies skim too, but overall scum tends to skim more than town, since they already have the information that the town is searching for.)TWILT said:
)))) )) )
I wouldn't call it useless, just not very informative. I'd say Frown, hasn't added a thing yet. Doesn't post often or tries. This brings me to vote on him again, now for real instead as a joke.
Big part of the problem.TWILT said:
Oh, I thought we were out of RVS.
And then this. Well, there are some newbies who didn't even answer the question.... I don't quite see anything suspicious here.
Here Guus calls you out on stating your suspicions, but he wasn't aware that apparently that's your "strategy." I've seen that strategy used before. First time I saw it I didn't really like it either. It was probably a misunderstanding.
I'll admit this is somewhat suspicious. Guus, if you don't have a decent lead, make a decent lead. It was said at one point in the game that the answers aren't just going to come to you, you need to post to get your information. Ask questions, pressure suspicious people, etc. Also, we've got plenty of time before the deadline. Everyone who hasn't contributed has a chance to offer more.
Obviously since he had voted for a person.
Well first I was informed about the RVS thing so I did make a vote, but I was hoping to get the ball rolling or something. :/
It was a nub mistake of mine, but I just wanted to see some action go on.
