everlasting yay
Smash Ace
***** and cawk.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
PAC, we've played twice in tourney. The first time, at Monk Aid I beat you and placed fourth in the tournament. I'm not really sure what you base the power rankings on but it seems as if its skewed greatly towards casual play not actual tourney results. PAC the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Ha. heh......I beat David last time I was against him in a tourney, and he barely goes to any tourneys at all. He is a great player I will agree with that, but he is not consistent(at least attendence wise). Also, I have placed higher than him in every tourney except two (the two he didn't actually fight me in)? that's how I can say it maybe?
I only add the parts about him not fighting me because you seem to think he should be ranked higher than me or that he is a better player than me. I am fine with you thinking that, but the system is as fair as it can be. If that's not true then tell us how to fix our system, not to fix what you think is wrong with the list.
Yeah, but the ninja roll looked so bad ***. What's better is that immediately after I whipped out an electric guitar and started wailing on it followed by me committing seppuku with a Frisbee.ninja roll is kinda like roll dodging lol.
So yeah i just got a pm from David, this was just a big misunderstanding. People just want to know how the panel makes it's decisions. When I get up with munkey again i will talk to him about adding to the front page to add a bit more detail.
Thanks to everyone who voiced their concerns, this is how we get better at what we do and make a better list for NC.
So you want concerns to be stressed? Okay.
Let me get this out there ~ I suck in smash. Okay? Now that that's cleared up, let me ask a few questions ~
Who chose the "panel"? Was it the Minority, or the Majority? Does the Panel only consist of players who've been "ranked"? If so, does this make it fair? Shouldn't there be people who play smash with unbiased views in the panel, sort of like a Jury in court (Brought in randomly, so there's no bias in the beginning)?
~To sum it up, I want to know how the Panel came to be~
-suggestion- Rather than this panel consist of 6 or so people, make it an odd, larger number of 9, or 11. I think that so if there's conflict, one side WILL override the other.
Just some friendly thoughts. Please clear any misunderstandings, and don't take what I've said out of proportion, MUNKEY!!! I wanna help out!![]()
zio.. please stop being a ******... i'm trying to be nice... there are no "requirements" to get on the panel.. if I want you on the panel.. then you're on.. it's that simpleYou mention requirements. And you say to be on the panel, you must not be overwhelmed by another's skills. There has to be more to it than that. It's too simple.
There hasn't been a toruney in like a week. Cut me some slack.wtf David? it's been like a whole week...why aren't you #1 yet?
Man, you fail...