I figured there would be questions like that.
Yes, some of my play is seemingly anti-green. I did, however, have one main reason why I voted OS.
1. Out of a small hope that Green role blocker blocked the blue recruiter, and that being the reason why OS wasn't successfully recruited, becuase I really only saw OS as being blue.
This still doesn't make any sense.
Your play isn't seemingly anti-green; it's entirely anti-green. You just said that you "really only saw OS as being blue", and your conclusion from that was "I bet the recruiter got roleblocked", then proceeded to vote him off? If you were really convinced OS was not on the green team, then he was probably mafia. Then you proceed to HELP vote him off, when you thought that there was only one mafia and voting him off would end the game.
I figured that, for the sake of Green, I had to distance myself as much away from them as possible. In the long term, being connected to Green, who was down significantly, would of probably only ended in my lynch later. Really, when you look at my two options that I had, either acting green or acting anti-green, both were working against my win-condition in different ways, I just figured I'll go with the one that gave me a slight more change of winning.
This makes even less sense. The best thing you could've done for your team is to claim green; then you'd have been a lynch target since no one would know if you were green or mafia, and it would reduce their chances of finding mafia. You realize that the reason they got Overswarm was because they only had two suspects to choose from (Frozenflame and OS), right?
You lucked out in that there turned out to be four mafia instead of two, but the logic of "let's give them a 50/50 chance at lynching scum by hiding!" doesn't make sense.
(In retrospect, I'm trying to remember if Summoner was ever actually confirmed to be a power role as claimed)
And on top of that- by claiming green just now, you made the most anti-green move possible.
Before you claimed, we could prove via voting statistics (assuming Gheb as confirmed blue) that the two mafia had to be in this group:
Praxis/Sworddancer/thedocsalive/Riddle
That gives blue team a 50% chance of lynching scum, and a 50% chance of lynching a member of the Blue team.
You claiming Green, though, gives us two choices:
The Praxis/thedocsalive/Riddle group contains one Mafia, and the Sworddancer/Frozenflame/SummonerAU group contains one Mafia.
And guess what? Voting for someone in the latter group is risk-less for Blue team. No chance of taking out a Blue player.
If you really are green, you're our MVP
So, the play for CVA should be very obvious; we have to vote out someone who is claimed Green, because there is three of them and one is Mafia. It's totally safe for Blue team, and has a 33% chance of lynching scum.
Vote: Sworddancer
This vote will stay until you come up with an explanation for playing anti-green that actually makes sense. If you can't give a reasonable explain why you lied, then Lynch All Liars applies.
Can anyone tell me if SummonerAU has done something to validate that he's actually an Interrupter? I just remember him sending everyone to lynch Meta-Kirby without explanation.