Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Dude, seriously, stop posting Bison crap.
Nah in all seriousness I bet Gnes will be in GFs. He's been steppin it up big time.Apex 2010
GF I bet it's M2K vs Ally
I would say that's a pretty safe bet.Apex 2010
GF I bet it's M2K vs Ally
He has, and he recently beat Dojo who always beat him, kinda like how Ally is now so it wouldn't surprise me to see him beat Ally, not to mention I think he'd take M2K out easier than Ally.@P4 Well, that's a possibility.. I hear gnes has been going toe2toe with Ally
I have faith that you will change that...I'm going to the Mexico National on 24th...
Wish me and my MK luck on a COUNTRY that lacks of gay metagame...
TP sucked; MM is the best Zelda.You should hear her reasoning for not liking TP. It's hilariously stupid.
How would your processor effect how your internet is working?edit: wtf triple post... my cpu tarding out this is y im getting a mac
If OoT hadn't been made MM would have been the best game of all time, by far.TP sucked; MM is the best Zelda.
I read this as "my computer sucks, I'm going to get one that's even worse".edit: wtf triple post... my cpu tarding out this is y im getting a mac
You're not really a computer person, are you?edit: my ****ty computer just gayed me into somehow triple posting. please ignore or delete this.
Frankly I didn't like TP's graphics, it just seemed like a recycled GC game.TP's graphics are beautiful, but it was just way too easy....
Ehh TWW I think is probably the second or third best.Flip those M's upside down and you're correct
What things did OoT do better than MM? It was more innovative in that it brought the series into 3D, and without it MM wouldn’t have existed. But MM was far more original in the actual gameplay. It took what was innovative about OoT, added a very deep, yet simple story with character development, and added some difficulty. Other than that and OoT being a little longer, I don't see what would make it better than MM considering MM did it better in pretty much every other way other than length and innovation...If OoT hadn't been made MM would have been the best game of all time, by far.
Why didn't you like TP, anyway?
I could go with third bestEhh TWW I think is probably the second or third best.
The main reason I liked OoT more was because, think about the first time you left Kokiri (spelling?) village, that was epic, possibly my favorite VG moment ever.What things did OoT do better than MM? It was more innovative in that it brought the series into 3D, and without it MM wouldn’t have existed. But MM was far more original in the actual gameplay. It took what was innovative about OoT, added a very deep, yet simple story with character development, and added some difficulty. Other than that and OoT being a little longer, I don't see what would make it better than MM considering MM did it better in pretty much every other way other than length and innovation...
Haven't pretty much all of the 3D Zelda games had that?For one, the story was recycled to all hell. LttP 3D much? Get 3 items, get the master sword, find the MS in the forest, go into a dark world,
I didn't see it that way, I did feel like Ganon would probably show up at some point, though.with the exception of the war being over Hyrule, not over the Triforce (the English version would have you think it’s over the Triforce in TP, but the Japanese version makes it kind of clear it’s over Hyrule, not the Triforce),
I have to agree with that, though it felt like it was about the same difficulty as OoT...The gameplay: Okay I might as well get this one out of the way; the game was far too easy. I killed myself while playing through because I wanted to see what the game over screen looked like.
Did you play the Cave of Ordeals or whatever in the Gerudo desert?Everything was too easy, from almost all of the puzzles, to ALL of the enemies, to the dungeons, etc.
There was no challenge at all.
I have to agree with that...The tears of light quests, OH MY GOD. Jesus were these ****ing boring.
You could find stuff to complain about in ANY Zelda game, so picking on TP alone isn't really fair.I could nitpick on other bad gameplay decisions (I could rant for paragraphs about how bad the vines were……………), but I won’t bother.
Er, Motion controls?Along with the fact that it really did NOTHING that was very innovative. There were a few original things here or there (magnetic iron boots were cool, the spinner was original but didn’t get near enough use outside of the dungeon you get it in), but other than a few really small things, there just wasn’t anything that different from the other games, except updated graphics.
You think OoT had a mediocre story?I can understand a game being mindlessly easy if it has a really good story, or a new good way to portray a story (like Heavy Rain, for instance), and I can understand a game having a poor story, but being really challenging or having good gameplay (Mario games can be really challenging. Atleast I die in Mario games). Or even a game that’s REALLY innovative while having mediocre difficulty and story (Ocarina of Time, for instance).
Am I the only one who found the Kaffai and Anju sidequest boring?MM was amazing, though. The story was new, it’s by far the darkest game in the series, and the gameplay was good (better than OoT due to the increased difficulty. It’s not a reaaaally difficult game, but it’s by far the hardest of the 3D games, and you can’t tell me that the Stone Tower Temple wasn’t hard and didn’t blow your mind when the ***** flipped on you), it had actual character development (TWW did this pretty well, too. But OoT and TP didn’t at all), it had lots of sidequests, it didn’t have repetitive and really annoying parts (like the Triforce quest in TWW, or those god **** tears of light quests). The only real flaw it had was that it was shorter than the other games, and with all the sidequests it had, it wasn’t THAT much shorter than the other ones.
Wait, you think OoT was better, but you like MM more...Personally I love OoT more, as I’ve had it since I was 3 and it has a lot of sentimental value to me (my oldest memories are playing it with my brother lol), and I would NOT be the same person I am today without that game (I wouldn’t be on this site, for one. I got into posting on internet forums because of Zelda, I got into Zelda because of OoT, and I got into smash because of Zelda).
But from an objective point of view, MM simply just did it better.
Not MM.Haven't pretty much all of the 3D Zelda games had that?
If you read the Japanese translation of the LttP manual, the similarities of the first half of the SW to TP are almost eery.I didn't see it that way, I did feel like Ganon would probably show up at some point, though.
ehh I think the puzzles were harder in OoT, but, yeah, fighting was about the same difficulty in TP as it was in OoT.I have to agree with that, though it felt like it was about the same difficulty as OoT...
Yeah. It was a little challenging, but I shouldn’t be required to play a sidequest to get any challenge at all out of the game.Did you play the Cave of Ordeals or whatever in the Gerudo desert?
Yeah, I could. But not as many, or as important things, as in TP. I mean what complaints could you seriously give about MM? Other than the length of the overall story being shorter than the other games, there really aren’t any bad flaws.You could find stuff to complain about in ANY Zelda game, so picking on TP alone isn't really fair.
I’m guessing you’re joking here, right? LolEr, Motion controls?
Mediocre may not be the best word. Unoriginal and predictable is probably more accurate, considering the game was made was made to be the backstory of LttP. Although it changed up a lot of stuff about it, so there were still some really original, new, surprising parts.You think OoT had a mediocre story?
I think so.Am I the only one who found the Kaffai and Anju sidequest boring?
Other way around. I like OoT more, but I think MM was an overall better game.Wait, you think OoT was better, but you like MM more...
For me on how much I enjoyed the games:I think OoT>TP>MM>WW.
I guess it's more like OoT>TP/MM>>TWW.rofl at thinking TP is better than MM. please get out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEuQowyUMFk&playnext_from=TL&videos=2lz5sjXUx4A
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^rofl at thinking TP is better than MM. please get out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEuQowyUMFk&playnext_from=TL&videos=2lz5sjXUx4A
You first.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^rofl at thinking TP is better than MM. please get out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEuQowyUMFk&playnext_from=TL&videos=2lz5sjXUx4A
I think Okami is the best Zelda game.
i c wat u did tharI think Okami is the best Zelda game.
this but tbh snes' lttp was kinda cartoony.imo i like the graphics of this new zelda not too real and not too cartoony
what it always should have been
Welcome manum... Hello everyone. I suppose most of you don't know me since I lurked the Ganon boards. Now I want to hang out with the cool kids at the MK boards. And yeah, I main MK now, used to main Wolf. I use the white MK since it uses my custom texture hack. I'm also a hacker and will make MK texture requests if they aren't too weird. I hope I get accepted in to the boards and I'll try to post often.
![]()
(For anyone curious on what my signature MK looks like.)
TL;DR: I'm new to the MK boards and want to be accepted in to this board.