Ookami-kun
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 882
...how people, even after many vids, say that Wolf is a clone.
I mean seriously, he's as clone as me to my sandwich. <_<
I mean seriously, he's as clone as me to my sandwich. <_<
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
In their exact words, they call the three Star Fox characters "three fraking Foxes". You would think that such a major website would at least use the spell-check button before posting articles. That wasn't even the only grammatical error in that article, I think I remember counting more than five. Not to mention the article itself was poorly written.Hmm Ign thinks Lucario is a clone.
They think Wolf is a clone
They Think Falco has clone
Ign thinks loading times are crap
It seems they didn't play the game
I would never doubt that Wolf isn't 100% unique. I just get annoyed when people call Wolf an exact clone, or say he's too similar to Fox just because he shares two moves with Fox ( Excluding the FS ).Wolf and falco are (semi)clones. do i get hate mail for that?
Seriously, is there ANY character whose 100% unique? Most characters have a projectile, A lot of characters have tether recovery, several have reflector-type things besides the star-fox reps, and every character on the roster uses a punching attack of some sort. OMG everyone is a clone of everyone!I would never doubt that Wolf isn't 100% unique. I just get annoyed when people call Wolf an exact clone, or say he's too similar to Fox just because he shares two moves with Fox ( Excluding the FS ).
1st, let me just state that I've never come across a person online that has compared Wolf as a "complete clone" of Fox. No one I've encountered has ever meant that Wolf is a "complete clone" of Fox when they say "Wolf's a Fox clone". If he were, then he'd look like Fox, and shared Fox's design. In other words, if Wolf were a literal clone of Fox (as some of you are taking the term clone character that literally), Brawl would literally have 2 characters named Fox with no differences between them. Obviously, when people call someone a clone in SSB, they mean (and it should go without saying) that they have enough similarities (cosmetic or otherwise) to compare them immediatley to another character. The fact that Wolf's basic moveset design is (and this is a fact) taken from Fox's is enough to call him a clone. So what if his moves have different properties, he's still basing his moves from Fox. If I were to copy someone else's written screenplay, but changed 30% of the plot, while 70% of the screenplay was the same, its still plagerism.Let me start out by saying that clones to noobs are not the same as clones to advanced players. Wolf's b-moves are all similar enough to fox and falco's to be considered a clone by a noob. (because noobs think that only b-moves diversify characters since they are special moves). In addition he had the same final smash. What would most literal noobs do? Play with final smash and all items in general is their form of "the serious" way of playing the game. That is how they play the game.
Wolf's aerials are all different from fox and falco
wolf's dash attack, smashes, and tilts are also different
wolf's b-moves are the same in a way but their properties and looks are different. For example wolf's reflector looks different acts the same u can't cancel it in the air constantly like fox's (named the J-shine...), but its still similar to be 'cloned'. His u-b and side b look different, but have the same uses (recovering). And then there's the laser different properties (wolf hits with his pistol when he pulls it out and is generally slower), but similar concept.
Noobs take the concept and consider him a clone.
I call characters like these semi-clones. Another example of a semi-clone would be ganon and falcon. Now even in melee no character worked exactly like the other, but some had the same moveset as others and we called these characters clones. For example falco had the same exact moveset as fox, but the properties were different and we considered them clones. In brawl they changed this completely there are no 2 characters that have the entirely same moveset or even close to entirely the same.
Analyze fox and falco in brawl (excluding effects):
Same b-moves, but also different like falco's shine (1 difference)
Same dair and u-air different nair and bair(2 differences)
same d-tilt and i believe f-tilt, different u-tilts (1 difference)
different jab (1 difference)
different f-smash (1 difference)
Edit: same grabs i believe
I call this example a semi-clone because there is 6 differences in their general moveset. I consider any1 character with same b-moves also being semi-clones. But no entire clones exist in brawl.
Different properties can still bag him in as a clone, think dr. marios pills and marios fireballs.We all know his B moves were inspired by Fox, but the thing is, they have different properties. It's like Ryu and Ken.
Every attack that involves the A button is unique to Wolf. Not a single one of them is shared or even similar to Fox's.Different properties can still bag him in as a clone, think dr. marios pills and marios fireballs.
On to the topic of Wolf's A button attacks, how many of them are similiar to Fox's(even if they have "different properties"?
Ign usually arnt the type to be morons about a game but man, they're being completely stupid about brawl, I mean, real idiots.Hmm Ign thinks Lucario is a clone.
They think Wolf is a clone
They Think Falco has clone
Ign thinks loading times are crap
It seems they didn't play the game
QFT. I don't remember Fox's fighting style revolve around clawing his opponent to shreds.Every attack that involves the A button is unique to Wolf. Not a single one of them is shared or even similar to Fox's.
You're right, there are no clones. Just people desperate for reasons to complain.every character brings their own plate to the table. It doesnt matter if Wolf's plate LOOKS like Fox's or Falco's, its his own ****ing plate and he deserves respect. - . -*
dont listen to the internet.
there are no clones.
The sad truth is, even with all these videos, some people are still just too close-minded to accept the fact that Wolf is much closer to being a unique character than a Fox clone. Oh well, I guess they can be ignorant all they want.Anyone who says and wholly believes that Wolf is a clone of Fox or Falco has not been paying attention in the slightest.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5u0QEsrYC_8
Check that out and be enlightened. Look at the Fox and Falco Exposures, too, while you're at it, so you can see the differences between all three.
They're all space animals, they have similar B-moves. It ends there.
Then that's their folly. They'll expect drillshine and get juggled for an hour from a throw. =\The sad truth is, even with all these videos, some people are still just too close-minded to accept the fact that Wolf is much closer to being a unique character than a Fox clone. Oh well, I guess they can be ignorant all they want.
I agree that Wolf has attacks that are different from Fox and Falco's, but he's still a StarFox character with moves taken strictly from Fox and Falco, with different effects added to make them 'unique'. I'm still not convinced that Wolf isn't a clone, but this topic isn't about my perception of him. Would you all be happier if he were referred to as a "variation" of Fox? "Variation" and "clone"...so interchangable, those words. Wolf could be a parody of Fox for all I care, I'm still going to play as him. You guys shouldn't let other people get to you.The sad truth is, even with all these videos, some people are still just too close-minded to accept the fact that Wolf is much closer to being a unique character than a Fox clone. Oh well, I guess they can be ignorant all they want.