I also understand Viet's concept, but what I don't get is that Marth's match-ups against them give him an advantage right? So even if MK ***** Marth, isn't it still good for Marth players that they have an advantage over these S-tier characters? Or are the match-up ratio's off?
Well, all the S tiers (in question) aren't exactly hard countered by Marth. In fact most of them can give Marth a run for his money. In no way are any of those S tier match-ups a walk in the park, even if Marth has a statistical advantage.
And then of course, even if Marth beats them out...it doesn't matter because guess what is going to be the most likely factor in stopping Marth dead in his tracks, MK, right? What are those characters that Marth beat have that Marth doesn't have? A supposedly even match-up.
And even if you do beat them, the counterpick most of the time will be Meta Knight. A Falco/MK player of the same skill level will more often than not have an easier time than a Marth/MK player in tournament. There are some instances where this isn't true, but it's a makeshift example to try to convey my point. I do see the flaw, especially if both were to fight a Falco player, then usually the Marth/MK player would have somewhat an easier time.
But that's ranting.
It's simply not feasible to go Marth all tourney. And these tier include tournament placings, not match-ups alone. Due to this, Marth is ranked lower even though he is a supposedly better character than Diddy, Falco, D3, and Wario, because they have something to deal with MK. So they will more likely get into top 8, thus placing and affecting their tier placements.
Or something like that. The Marth regs know I suck at explaining things...among other things.
Emblem Lord thinks of us as comedians...isn't that enough to show his gratitude?
The lot of us still playing Smash Brothers competitively...hilarious.