Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
My Skype name is bugcatcherwill, the profile name will be William MoranJust post your skype name and I'll add you.
Thats possible?I ate too much chocolate![]()
Wouldn't that give them an advantage in 2 stock because it's easier to time out?Reasons I heard for 2 stock was:
-cuz sanic
-cuz Pac man
-cuz Rosaluma
whatever it is it doesn't benefit lucarioWhat's the argument for 2-stock again, other than it makes matches faster?
In this case, it's not because it benefits any character, it's because two stock gets it over with faster.Wouldn't that give them an advantage in 2 stock because it's easier to time out?
What a bunch of assholes, I'd do 4 stocks just to spite them.Most of our melee community argues for 2-stock because it gets smash 4 off the stream faster.
Less stocks means less risk taking and less risk taking means more overly defensive play and over defensive play means longer games!I wonder how 3-stocks would actually prevent camping as the timer runs out. It doesn't make sense to me.
However, what if someone decides to take less risks earlier, especially if they're using a character that is good at camping or if they're in the lead in a 3-stock match?Less stocks means less risk taking and less risk taking means more overly defensive play and over defensive play means longer games!
Then it will play out similarly to how overly defensive people play now? Excessive defense can happen no matter how many stocks.However, what if someone decides to take less risks earlier, especially if they're using a character that is good at camping or if they're in the lead in a 3-stock match?
Do you just interject whenever you see a chance to rip on something?2 stocks because it's brawl 2
I killed a Paultena at 17% with Luc's FSmash at 150% (with the deadly lightning effect too!) about a week ago. Aura scaling with rage is so funny when you land those lol FSmashes.It's actually a multiplier that affects the final knockback value. It would still affect base knockback value directly along with the portion of knockback that scales with damage, and the results of the calculations that I made by using that data suggest that it is that type of multiplier.
It does seem to be very powerful. At those percentages with the side smash attack being fresh, the attack would deal approximately 166 units of knockback to Palutena, which is a lot.I killed a Paultena at 17% with Luc's FSmash at 150% (with the deadly lightning effect too!) about a week ago. Aura scaling with rage is so funny when you land those lol FSmashes.
I killed a Paultena at 17% with Luc's FSmash at 150% (with the deadly lightning effect too!) about a week ago. Aura scaling with rage is so funny when you land those lol FSmashes.
Killing someone with forward smash when they are at 0% is the best thing in the game!
Hearing these examples amuses me.I don't know about you guys, but getting a grabbed Force Palm and killing at 20% always makes my day.
Yes, Diddy rewards good reads and good combos. Pure skill.We should be ashamed, Lucario is broken and rewards bad play