Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
see? 10 year oldsHEY, I has Minecraft and it's ok xD Don't hate the game guys :3
lolwat. Did they give him unlimited QA inputs or something then?I just read the latest update of brawl minus and they removed QAC... wow
first world problems
Where did you see this?I just read the latest update of brawl minus and they removed QAC... wow
first world problems
HEY bro, men like to be creative too.see? 10 year olds
So just because he's not the best he shouldn't recieve nerfs?[the changes + link]
So basically all he got was nerfs, and he wasn't even the best anymore
Have you tried to do any of what your saying with the new changes? The ground cancel change isn't a removal of the jump cancel, and the jump cancel was delayed because kirby, yes kirby, could make a wall of tjolts with pika hat.those jolt cancels were so good and they just decided to kill it completely. I wish they'd just lowered the damage on jolts instead, would've made me still feel good and be able to use them for combos
Seems suspicious... just saying.some men still wear diapers just sayin
Her fingers!just looks like a blind chick
In what situations does this actually nerf an action that you would want to do with Pika?so pikachu was nerfed because of kirby? That's even lamerrr
They never changed their philosophy.I'm just saying I thought the whole point of Brawl minus was that if a character was overpowered, they'd bring everyone else up to that level instead of bringing the overpowered character down. Yes I understand that's pretty unrealistic to expect and could easily result in a completely destroyed game, but when they're nerfing characters who aren't even the best, makes me wonder if they changed their philosophy.
You could consider that the artistic goal, not the technical one.I'm not necessarily saying that what they did was a bad change from a competitive standpoint, it's just my opinion that it contradicts the original goal of the project. Which is that if the game is broken, break it until it's fixed.