Ussi
Smash Legend
its underage girls dancing in bikinis. Their 14 :|Finally found the sig Bored's talking about and I have also watched the whole anime. It's not even that bad, calm down.
Oh no, girls in bikinis dancing.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
its underage girls dancing in bikinis. Their 14 :|Finally found the sig Bored's talking about and I have also watched the whole anime. It's not even that bad, calm down.
Oh no, girls in bikinis dancing.
Their delicious *licks his lips and laughs his pain off*its underage girls dancing in bikinis. Their 14 :|
I could care less if the anime isn't that bad, but the fact is, that dude took a particular scene that emphasizes underage girls and their ***, and decided to sig it.Finally found the sig Bored's talking about and I have also watched the whole anime. It's not even that bad, calm down.
Oh no, girls in bikinis dancing.
Really? Thats your defense? Because it's "fictional" we can shrug it off? The reason porn is not allowed on here is because we're afraid minors will see it. So what's to stop a minor from questioning the difference between a real underage girl's *** being shaken vs a cartoon?Their delicious *licks his lips and laughs his pain off*
@Bored: Just chill mang, nothing wrong with fictional lil girls in bikini's. Something would be wrong if they weren't however, but I'd question why that user would still be able to post moreso than eyerape the content.
blast... ninja'dThat's sexually explicit? I think you're mixing up suggestive themes and sexually explicit material. They're dancing for a line of fashion products since they're teen models. I can understand if you personally think that's wrong, but there's nothing sexually explicit about it at all. That would be like saying Victoria's Secret models are porn stars because of their job.
Reddit was recently criticized for having a jail bait thread where people were posting underage girls in limited clothing. No nudity, but lawyers on various news sites said that can still be prosecuted under law for sexually explicit material/child pornography. So unless SWF sees "sexually explicit" and "inappropriate content" as two different things from US law, then what you're saying is a moot point. I've already stated I see no difference between anime and real life. A minor can take influence the same way from either one.That's sexually explicit? I think you're mixing up suggestive themes and sexually explicit material. They're dancing for a line of fashion products since they're teen models. I can understand if you personally think that's wrong, but there's nothing sexually explicit about it at all. That would be like saying Victoria's Secret models are porn stars because of their job.
Which I find absurd, everyone knows fiction is perfection.What if Denti isn't a first time offender? But I agree with the instant perma-ban thing.
Real or not, loli is a loli by US law and you can't have it legally. That's why loli mangas and animes don't get licensed.
In fact, a man got arrested for having loli images.
There is no where near enough research to make a 100% accurate statement that loli porn or whatever that dude got charged with reduces pedophilia. Every situation has to be treated unique. Just because violent video games don't cause violent behavior does not mean it can be the same for child pornography = to actual pedophilia.Which I find absurd, everyone knows fiction is perfection.
As for the guy being arrested, dude ended up with a bad DA, i mean, they didn't even use statistics of how said manga proved effective to keep most people from actually committing an act on an actual child.
Lots of other variables prove that it could benefit moreso than turn people into such atrocities, but the religious nut jobs seem to be more loud with their mouths and have a way with throwing fake tears to the court and saying "think of the children".
Meh, gonna shutup here. Just make myself more sick if I keep going lol
I'm not gonna get into societal laws because if you disagree with them, you might as well just live elsewhere. I also don't know what the nature of those pictures were, as something like a loli about to pull down her underwear while looking back at you with puppy eyes is a completely different context than the sig. Taking this at face value for what it is, they are girls doing their job that they get paid for. You can interpret it whatever way you want, and take it with your own perceived context since you haven't seen the anime, but that's the cold, hard fact. It's not like they're posing for a dirty magazine or whatever. They aren't even wearing bikinis that expose more than any other ones would, as if they were ripped or being worn loosely.Reddit was recently criticized for having a jail bait thread where people were posting underage girls in limited clothing. No nudity, but lawyers on various news sites said that can still be prosecuted under law for sexually explicit material/child pornography. So unless SWF sees "sexually explicit" and "inappropriate content" as two different things from US law, then what you're saying is a moot point. I've already stated I see no difference between anime and real life. A minor can take influence the same way from either one.
And that still doesn't bypass the rule of "inappropriate content." It's stupid how a sig of someone apparently lipping "****" is more inappropriate than some loli shaking her *** in a bikini. In fact, I don't see how a curse word being lipped is more inappropriate than ANY GIRL shaking her *** in a bikini.
Just the last bit when they zoom in on the ***.Is it the whole sig or the *** shaking specifically that Bored doesn't like? Just curious. I would consider just the *** shaking as sexual/suggestive images.
So wait...a loli about to pull down her underwear constitutes to you as inappropriate, but zooming on some lolis shaking their ***, one in particular wearing a bikini is fine? Okay.I'm not gonna get into societal laws because if you disagree with them, you might as well just live elsewhere. I also don't know what the nature of those pictures were, as something like a loli about to pull down her underwear while looking back at you with puppy eyes is a completely different context than the sig.
This. Just keep the shield up until they jab. Only keep in mind that if they jab your shield, they may try to grab instead of doing jab2. In which case, you just jab earlier. Or spot dodge, but I don't like spot dodging against Peach in general.I dunno, i've had Peachs fair > jab me and I just punished after the jab.