• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Ike Boards General/Q&A Thread

Senliten

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
1,110
Location
In the back room, sleeping with the waifu
NNID
Senliten
its underage girls dancing in bikinis. Their 14 :|
Their delicious *licks his lips and laughs his pain off*
@Bored: Just chill mang, nothing wrong with fictional lil girls in bikini's. Something would be wrong if they weren't however, but I'd question why that user would still be able to post moreso than eyerape the content.
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
Finally found the sig Bored's talking about and I have also watched the whole anime. It's not even that bad, calm down.

Oh no, girls in bikinis dancing.
I could care less if the anime isn't that bad, but the fact is, that dude took a particular scene that emphasizes underage girls and their ***, and decided to sig it.

Their delicious *licks his lips and laughs his pain off*
@Bored: Just chill mang, nothing wrong with fictional lil girls in bikini's. Something would be wrong if they weren't however, but I'd question why that user would still be able to post moreso than eyerape the content.
Really? Thats your defense? Because it's "fictional" we can shrug it off? The reason porn is not allowed on here is because we're afraid minors will see it. So what's to stop a minor from questioning the difference between a real underage girl's *** being shaken vs a cartoon?

Really, that's a double standard you're taking. Does this mean I can have a sig of someone's head getting cut off from an anime, and it's A-Okay, but if it were real life, it would be wrong? Is there a difference if no blood comes out, or even better...fairy dust?

To me, that sig falls under "inappropriate content" and "sexually explicit material." There's no way you can defend that and say that is NOT inappropriate content.

Seriously, one thing I hated about AiB was so many people would get away with posting sexually suggestive loli images or even grown woman suggestive anime images, but if it were a real person...NOPE!

@Ussi: Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. I suck at reading lips, so I had no idea what the hell Kobe was saying. I still find it funny it took them 6+ months to finally give me a warning. Maybe other mods didn't care as well.
 

Berserker Swordsman

Smash Lord
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
1,959
Location
Philadelphia, PA
NNID
KiteKIrby
That's sexually explicit? I think you're mixing up suggestive themes and sexually explicit material. They're dancing for a line of fashion products since they're teen models. I can understand if you personally think that's wrong, but there's nothing sexually explicit about it at all. That would be like saying Victoria's Secret models are porn stars because of their job.
 

Senliten

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
1,110
Location
In the back room, sleeping with the waifu
NNID
Senliten
That's sexually explicit? I think you're mixing up suggestive themes and sexually explicit material. They're dancing for a line of fashion products since they're teen models. I can understand if you personally think that's wrong, but there's nothing sexually explicit about it at all. That would be like saying Victoria's Secret models are porn stars because of their job.
blast... ninja'd
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
That's sexually explicit? I think you're mixing up suggestive themes and sexually explicit material. They're dancing for a line of fashion products since they're teen models. I can understand if you personally think that's wrong, but there's nothing sexually explicit about it at all. That would be like saying Victoria's Secret models are porn stars because of their job.
Reddit was recently criticized for having a jail bait thread where people were posting underage girls in limited clothing. No nudity, but lawyers on various news sites said that can still be prosecuted under law for sexually explicit material/child pornography. So unless SWF sees "sexually explicit" and "inappropriate content" as two different things from US law, then what you're saying is a moot point. I've already stated I see no difference between anime and real life. A minor can take influence the same way from either one.

And that still doesn't bypass the rule of "inappropriate content." It's stupid how a sig of someone apparently lipping "****" is more inappropriate than some loli shaking her *** in a bikini. In fact, I don't see how a curse word being lipped is more inappropriate than ANY GIRL shaking her *** in a bikini.
 

Teh Brettster

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
3,428
Location
Denton, Texas (Dallas)
Honestly I am wanting to make a petition to do away with INSTANT PERMA-bans.

I think Permabans should only be used for repeat offenders. I'm okay with an instant ban, but not an instant perma-ban. Something about it just... really gets to me.
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
I'll agree with that too. Even if a insta-ban lasts 2 months or so...I think it's a good enough lesson learned. I like the point system, but for serious offenses, an insta-ban for a long period of time works as well.

Too bad we don't have a mod on the Ike boards to talk to, who can take it up with the admins :troll:
 

Ussi

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
17,147
Location
New Jersey (South T_T)
3DS FC
4613-6716-2183
What if Denti isn't a first time offender? But I agree with the instant perma-ban thing.

Real or not, loli is a loli by US law and you can't have it legally. That's why loli mangas and animes don't get licensed.

In fact, a man got arrested for having loli images.
 

Senliten

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
1,110
Location
In the back room, sleeping with the waifu
NNID
Senliten
What if Denti isn't a first time offender? But I agree with the instant perma-ban thing.

Real or not, loli is a loli by US law and you can't have it legally. That's why loli mangas and animes don't get licensed.

In fact, a man got arrested for having loli images.
Which I find absurd, everyone knows fiction is perfection.

As for the guy being arrested, dude ended up with a bad DA, i mean, they didn't even use statistics of how said manga proved effective to keep most people from actually committing an act on an actual child.

Lots of other variables prove that it could benefit moreso than turn people into such atrocities, but the religious nut jobs seem to be more loud with their mouths and have a way with throwing fake tears to the court and saying "think of the children".

Meh, gonna shutup here. Just make myself more sick if I keep going lol
 

Ussi

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
17,147
Location
New Jersey (South T_T)
3DS FC
4613-6716-2183
I'm just stating facts, I have no opinion on whether fictional images that represent pre-pubescent girls should be legal or not. Because honestly... if you can't draw a line between fiction and reality then there is something wrong with you already.
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
Which I find absurd, everyone knows fiction is perfection.

As for the guy being arrested, dude ended up with a bad DA, i mean, they didn't even use statistics of how said manga proved effective to keep most people from actually committing an act on an actual child.

Lots of other variables prove that it could benefit moreso than turn people into such atrocities, but the religious nut jobs seem to be more loud with their mouths and have a way with throwing fake tears to the court and saying "think of the children".

Meh, gonna shutup here. Just make myself more sick if I keep going lol
There is no where near enough research to make a 100% accurate statement that loli porn or whatever that dude got charged with reduces pedophilia. Every situation has to be treated unique. Just because violent video games don't cause violent behavior does not mean it can be the same for child pornography = to actual pedophilia.

The best we have for now are case studies, but there are generally so many other variables that they can easily be dissolved in an argument. That's a big reason why violent video games never get equated to violent behavior.
 

Zatchiel

a little slice of heaven 🍰
Joined
May 27, 2009
Messages
11,088
Location
Georgia
NNID
Zatchiel
Switch FC
SW-0915-4119-3504
Peach's airdodge is pretty abysmal, take advantage of this for landing KO moves. I spam Nair and Bair a load, jabs when I can, grabs when the situation presents itself.
Peach's Dair, the end. All of her aerials have their uses, but Dair is pretty convinient. The slaps also aren't something to take lightly. Turnips can be dealt with effeciently, and provide use for you if you play your cards right. Worst case scenario is you getting gimped by one.
 

Berserker Swordsman

Smash Lord
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
1,959
Location
Philadelphia, PA
NNID
KiteKIrby
Reddit was recently criticized for having a jail bait thread where people were posting underage girls in limited clothing. No nudity, but lawyers on various news sites said that can still be prosecuted under law for sexually explicit material/child pornography. So unless SWF sees "sexually explicit" and "inappropriate content" as two different things from US law, then what you're saying is a moot point. I've already stated I see no difference between anime and real life. A minor can take influence the same way from either one.

And that still doesn't bypass the rule of "inappropriate content." It's stupid how a sig of someone apparently lipping "****" is more inappropriate than some loli shaking her *** in a bikini. In fact, I don't see how a curse word being lipped is more inappropriate than ANY GIRL shaking her *** in a bikini.
I'm not gonna get into societal laws because if you disagree with them, you might as well just live elsewhere. I also don't know what the nature of those pictures were, as something like a loli about to pull down her underwear while looking back at you with puppy eyes is a completely different context than the sig. Taking this at face value for what it is, they are girls doing their job that they get paid for. You can interpret it whatever way you want, and take it with your own perceived context since you haven't seen the anime, but that's the cold, hard fact. It's not like they're posing for a dirty magazine or whatever. They aren't even wearing bikinis that expose more than any other ones would, as if they were ripped or being worn loosely.

I've always thought of "inappropriate content" as a touchy subject that has no objective line to be drawn for it, but if something like that sig should get modded, that's overreacting to 15 frames of animation to me. There's no emphasis within the entire animation on their backsides, so no one should have to think that they should be focused on that part of the sig.
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
Is it the whole sig or the *** shaking specifically that Bored doesn't like? Just curious. I would consider just the *** shaking as sexual/suggestive images.
Just the last bit when they zoom in on the ***.

I'm not gonna get into societal laws because if you disagree with them, you might as well just live elsewhere. I also don't know what the nature of those pictures were, as something like a loli about to pull down her underwear while looking back at you with puppy eyes is a completely different context than the sig.
So wait...a loli about to pull down her underwear constitutes to you as inappropriate, but zooming on some lolis shaking their ***, one in particular wearing a bikini is fine? Okay.
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
No, I didn't. Like I said, the fact they had to zoom up on their ***** is more than enough "context" for me to know what the intent was.
 

Ussi

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
17,147
Location
New Jersey (South T_T)
3DS FC
4613-6716-2183
BS, context of that anime is about loli incest :\ at least that's the running theme. Granted it doesn't happen, but that's what the story revolves around.
 

Blubolouis

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,005
Location
Paris, France
She -they- never stop x_x I have to roll away in the end.

How do I deal with float cancel fair? I use bair a lot, our fair easily outrange it, but they have to be retreating. And in the end I end up being cornered near the edge, except in this match-up I feel there's no easy way to regain stage control.

I'm just bad at the m-u, I'll ask for a critique against another peach player real soon. Hopefully someone else than Nys (RIP for now D:) will critique it.
 

Ussi

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
17,147
Location
New Jersey (South T_T)
3DS FC
4613-6716-2183
fair takes 18 frames to come out, learn the animation for it :\ its basically like hitting someone with our fair but a shorter range and it has an advantage on block :s
 

Mr. Doom

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
5,681
Location
Electrodrome
NNID
MrDoom8000
That's not what prack-sis said (when I was still in the BBR). Apparently Peach still has frame advantage, though no one has ever been able to jab me. And his response was that the players weren't auto-canceling the f-airs correctly. Perhaps your math is wrong, buddy, or perhaps every peach player sucks. Take your pick.

Also, they think they have the advantage in the match-up. I had fun times arguing against that case. >_>
 

Ussi

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
17,147
Location
New Jersey (South T_T)
3DS FC
4613-6716-2183
Peach's toad can be ledge teched and you can punish with aether, for you pros.

I dunno, i've had Peachs fair > jab me and I just punished after the jab. Its like doing a FF fair with Ike and having him land with his longest range hitbox out. All i know is their fair has the quickest landing lag of all their aerials. Scratch that, think of nair and having less landing lag the sooner you land from hitting with it.
 

Teh Brettster

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
3,428
Location
Denton, Texas (Dallas)
I dunno, i've had Peachs fair > jab me and I just punished after the jab.
This. Just keep the shield up until they jab. Only keep in mind that if they jab your shield, they may try to grab instead of doing jab2. In which case, you just jab earlier. Or spot dodge, but I don't like spot dodging against Peach in general.
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
I mean, I feel like Peach's only kill move vs Ike is f-air and up-tilt/up-smash at higher percents? Of course, if she plucks a bomb, that's another situation.
 

Heartstring

Smash Legend
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
11,129
Location
England
i have no idea how i rate the ike peach matchup. because its so dependent on playstyle. id probably go with 50-50. possible 55-45 to them, but mostly 50/50
 

Ussi

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
17,147
Location
New Jersey (South T_T)
3DS FC
4613-6716-2183
Ussi 2,272
theeboredone 1,678
Golden-psyco 1,000
san. 860
Teh Brettster 821
Berserker Swordsman 775
jamlosingthegame 615
Nysyarc 606
Senliten 554


congrats GP, welcome to the 1k club
 
Top Bottom