Tyrant won an MK banned tournament which proves that MK isn't broken and that top MK players are just really good.
Not really. One tournament doesn't prove much.
What if I told you that Tearbear got second at this same tournament?
So?
But what proof do we have of MK being broken other than top MK players consistently placing in the money
@ steam, new characters are going to have to be tested in an MK banned tournament since most players lost their mains and secondaries.
The fact that pretty much all of the top players use MK, MK getting half of the tourney paper, MK having no bad matchups and probably no even ones, etc.
Melee Fox and 64 Pikachu also have no disadvantageous MUs. The ledge grab limit is enforced on all characters. FD is a bad stage for MK.
Melee Fox loses to Marth and Falco. Fox also can lose to Puff on certain stages like RC. MK still ***** hard on FD.
Even though I don't believe you, that still leaves SSB 64 Pikachu. In SOCAL we've always had the LGL set to 35 for every character and there was never a problem. I don't know why the BBR thinks that every other character needs 50 ledge grabs. They've also already found proof that MK's perfect planking is beatable.
MK loses to ICs, Diddy and Fox on FD
No he doesn't. If he was, then why is he God Tier in the current tier list? Even if he did, MK can just strike, ban, or not pick that stage so he wouldn't lose.
Lol, a matchup chart based on ONE stage doesn't prove a character to be banned.
MK loses to Diddy slightly on FD.
sorry for the double post
lol no. MK can just abuse his air mobility against Diddy.
I have shown proof that MK players can win tournaments even without having to use MK. If MK is really the only reason that we have a LGL, then why is it that the BBR added it to the rule set after Will (DK) planked his way to victory against Rich brown?
DK's plank game isn't as broken as Meta Knight's. Also MK has a lot of other broken stuff to him unlike DK like best recovery, best gimp and air game, etc. DK also has some noticable weaknesses like chain grabbing, juggles, comboing, etc.
Look at it this way. If this tournament was not MK banned, Tyrant's winnings would be added to MK's winnings which is the reason why MK makes so much of the money. It's not the character, it's the player.
No, Ally used to get beat by M2K until he switched to MK and then he was able to beat M2K and even make M2K rage quit in CoT5 singles. That's a good example as to why MK should get a ban.
One of Tearbears posts on AIB: "the tourny sets between me and tyrant were kinda gay cause it was just CPing
who ever would guess right on the double blind pick would usually win the 1st match and the whole set plus unity rule set was in play so I could never stay luigi on a cp or something cause of the infinite being allowed etc etc"
Is this really how we want the game to be?
WAYYYYYYYY better than having MK dittoes all of the time and not seeing anyone else in tournaments. Do you really want to go to Brawl tourneys just to see a bunch of MK marathons?
There is nothing wrong with what we have. All I see is top players winning with a top tier character. Take that character away from them and the will be winning with their next best character. Take that one away from them and they will still be winning with their next best character.
You don't remove a character just because a top player chooses to use him. Why don't you prove that MK is broken by winning the next national with him?
We have proved it over the years with so many top ppl using MK in NATIONALS and Ally switching to MK and able to beat M2K in CoT5. Also mk getting so much of the tourney money proves why he should get banned.
Also, unlike mk, the other characters actually have there bad matchups and so character counters can finally exist.
1.In that case there should have never been a LGL for anyone besides MK.
2.There is no reason to ban MK. He is not broken. Top players that win money with him can still win money with other characters. Stages like Brinstar and RC make it so that most players are forced to pick up secondaries (and who's a better secondary than MK). Places that have these stages banned don't seem to have as big of an MK problem as we do. I don't think thos stages need to be banned. I just think we need a better rule set
3. I can do that because it's my opinion.
2. Got any proof for the bolded stuff? And also who's the secondarythen, MK? Cause mk is like players only choice to success nowadays.
1.The point is that the LGL is enforced on every character
2. I don't have to do that. I already have proof that stages like Brinstar and RC cause MK usage to go up. Just look at the tournament results of other countries that have those stages banned. I know of players in the US who have picked up MK just to fight on these stages. TKD, Mike Haze, DEHF, I've seen Gnes use MK on these stages. By using this character for these stages, they increase the number of MK usage since it comes out in the tournament results.
3. Nobody can state match ups as facts.
2. It's not just rc and brinstar, mk has been successful pretty much everywhere in the U.S. in pretty much everyway.
3. In this situation, stating matchups would be a good fact to bring up on this discussion.
Players usually ban RC or Brinstar against MK and the only reason those stages don't have as many bans as FD is because you only get one ban.
The fact that you can only ban one of those makes stage banning useless. MK ***** on neutrals and really ***** on cps.