Miharu
Smash Hero
Did you really need to quote his whole wall of text just to say that roflWhoever told you that Peach was mediocre and mid tier lied to you.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Did you really need to quote his whole wall of text just to say that roflWhoever told you that Peach was mediocre and mid tier lied to you.
Yes I did. I read it, and I thought "I should quote that part and point out its wrong" and then I thought "**** it, I'll be lazy and quote the whole **** thing"Did you really need to quote his whole wall of text just to say that rofl
Once again, yeah i know, I just figured it would confuse alot of people who didn't bother to read the wall of text.You can just everything that's irrelevant in the quoted post.
Pretty sure Kage has Ganon as his avatar.
Lol, not really.lmao melee is probably the most technical fighting game ever made
Well if it isn't, it's definitely up there somewhere. I'd like to see another fighting game where you have to move your fingers as fast as Melee does.Lol, not really.
Explain this before mind implosions occur.More simple gameplay, yet more complex at the same time. :
You found 4chan. You win the internet scavenger hunt. Don't you feel enlightened?Umm, it's apples and oranges, at least at the moment. Brawl's meta-game has barely been started. Melee's is almost fully known, basically, if not fully known. And stop expecting a meta-game to randomly pop-up. Brawl isn't Melee 2.0, in case you didn't get the memo when it was called "Super Smash Bros. Brawl". There will be new techs. Hell, there's already dozens of new techs. Overall, I think in time Brawl will be better. More balance, better stages (actually good stages on average; the average Melee stage blows [compared to Brawl and smash 64, especially]), more balanced items (oddly enough >_<), and diffrent gameplay. More simple gameplay, yet more complex at the same time. I definitely like Brawl more at this point then I did with Melee. >_>
For the final f***ing time though, a meta-game just doesn't pop-up in the first second. It is developed over years. Stop being 4chan steriotypes, and play the god d*** game for some of you Brawl-haters because it's not Melee 2.0. New game, new physics, new moves, new techniques. God d***, this is the dumbest thread ever. Some of you are making 4chan look smart.
Yeah the tripping is sooooo annoying...I got smashed while tripping so many times.I don't like brawls slower pace and tripping is the worst idea ever
okay i'm really getting tired of this "melee 2.0" thing. Me and my friend played melee competitively and then when brawl came out he liked it, i thought it was okay, but different so i decided to play SC. I asked him to play SC and when he began to crique it i told him it wasn't melee 2.0 so he should give it a chance o.O. BASICALLY i'm pretty sure we know it's not 2.0, that doesn't mean we have to like it if we liked melee a lot.Umm, it's apples and oranges, at least at the moment. Brawl's meta-game has barely been started. Melee's is almost fully known, basically, if not fully known. And stop expecting a meta-game to randomly pop-up. Brawl isn't Melee 2.0, in case you didn't get the memo when it was called "Super Smash Bros. Brawl". There will be new techs. Hell, there's already dozens of new techs. Overall, I think in time Brawl will be better. More balance, better stages (actually good stages on average; the average Melee stage blows [compared to Brawl and smash 64, especially]), more balanced items (oddly enough >_<), and diffrent gameplay. More simple gameplay, yet more complex at the same time. I definitely like Brawl more at this point then I did with Melee. >_>
For the final f***ing time though, a meta-game just doesn't pop-up in the first second. It is developed over years. Stop being 4chan steriotypes, and play the god d*** game for some of you Brawl-haters because it's not Melee 2.0. New game, new physics, new moves, new techniques. God d***, this is the dumbest thread ever. Some of you are making 4chan look smart.
thats definaetly hilarious!Also:
Renth is a prophet.
TOTAL QFT! If only people weren't so close-minded, and hated a game after playing it for 10 minutes, and tried to look deeper. Melee didn't reach it's full potential until 4 or 5 years, no? Simply put, leave it to the "SUPER AWSOME Y34HDUD3!!!" to win a thread!Smash Bros. is my favorite game series. Melee was and is my favorite game of all time. I played it to death with my friends. I used the ATs, but not too much, since I wanted to play at around the same level they did. It was all fun.
Now that Brawl has rolled by and I've played it extensively, I have to say that I love it to death. Will it surpass my love of Melee? Who cares?
I have no problems with Brawl's gameplay, since Melee wasn't fully developed less than a month after release, but it wouldn't hurt if some techs were discovered RIGHT NOW.
Love both games, I say!
I'm not aiming it at you, though. I'm aiming it at the PEOPLE who EXPECT A GAME'S ENTIRE META-GAME TO APPEAR IN 2 F***ING SECONDS OF PLAY! People did this with smash 64. They expect all the previous smash game's meta-game to carry over, or if it doesn't, they expect the meta-game to just pop-up. They want the same thing over and over again. Well that gets boring. They judge the game's total competitve levels in 2 seconds. That's it. It's smash 64 all over again. They tarnish the smash bros. competitve scene with their stupidity, and lack of patience by saying Brawl sucks in the competitve aspect. These things take time, 3 to 5 years of time AT LEAST-not 2 months.okay i'm really getting tired of this "melee 2.0" thing. Me and my friend played melee competitively and then when brawl came out he liked it, i thought it was okay, but different so i decided to play SC. I asked him to play SC and when he began to crique it i told him it wasn't melee 2.0 so he should give it a chance o.O. BASICALLY i'm pretty sure we know it's not 2.0, that doesn't mean we have to like it if we liked melee a lot.
Simple is what smash bros. is. It's really the only 2-button fighting game. Every other fighting game is basically 4 button. Smash bros. is unrealistic as f***, and simple as f***. You can pick up and play, right off the bat. It's that simple. There is less focus on doing small, minute things. L-cancelling is automatic. EdgeHugging is a new advanced tech that is faster then wavedashing into edegehogging. Movement is easier. Passing through platforms isn't annoying as f***. You don't focus on minor movement details, you focus, on the tactics now, and the techniques. The techniques we have and will discover. The over 50 techniques we've already found. We've already found more techniques since E for All then Melee in the first year. That's how many we've found. The competitve meta-game is shaping up to focus more on tactics and the most advanced techniques rather then basic movements like wavedashing (wavedashing is a basic advanced techniqued...well, competitvely, at least; contradicting! ).Explain this before mind implosions occur.
Please. Stop with the stupid analogies that prove nothing, and let's cut to the chase.You found 4chan. You win the internet scavenger hunt. Don't you feel enlightened?
Have you ever picked up a game and then decided it was bad. That's how some people feel about this. Like when you go look for a girlfriend. I, personally, am very biased. No fatties. Maybe if you give them time, they're cool people. But I don't like them from the get go. It's just not my thing. But if fatties are your thing...
So, I'm going to stick to melee instead of fatties.
sorry, i dont like that argument because there are LOTS of sequals where the games have been EXACTLY the same as the previous ones, with just things added on to them, VERY LITTLE removed, if anything. For example, pokemon series, mario 1-3, etc...also in reference to you saying dont expect zelda II to be zelda I...makes me sad=P because every 1 could only have hoped that zelda II could be as good as zelda I , but zelda II sucked in comparison...Just adapt experience and stop whining...
all this talk about brawl being bad because they took out the so called `advanced techs` is as bad as when people were whining about the change from street fighter 2 to street fighter 3. If you`re playing brawl don`t expect melee... Same as if you`re playing smash melee don`t expect Smash 64.
And for the heck of it if your playing yoshi`s island 2, don`t expect yoshi`s island one. If you`re playing legend of zelda 2, don`t expect legend of zelda 1. The list is infinite...
I said don't expect it not that they won't be...sorry, i dont like that argument because there are LOTS of sequals where the games have been EXACTLY the same as the previous ones, with just things added on to them, VERY LITTLE removed, if anything. For example, pokemon series, mario 1-3, etc...also in reference to you saying dont expect zelda II to be zelda I...makes me sad=P because every 1 could only have hoped that zelda II could be as good as zelda I , but zelda II sucked in comparison...