After re-reading
Since it looks like I'm going to be the lynch, I'll leave my last words.
TG7 is town and I've already explained it.
If T-Block is scum, he would be an indy, so don't play him off as town just because he's one of the more experienced players.
Just because Auspher claims a main character does not mean it can't be a safeclaim.
Tery might be playing off his meta of being generally useless to coast as scum. Same with TPK.
Kantrip should be the first person looked at tomorrow, his complete change in his read on me is awful and I already talked about it.
I don't know about RR and frankly I don't care.
John seems more intent on getting claims out of people rather than lynching scum, look at him as well.
Tunnel vision is bad.
Our dead man's last words.
And I still agree with his read on Kantrip. Somewhere around the start of page 17 (20 ppp) you were still defending JTB's lynch in that he was too expierenced to lose and also that you thought he was town.
Fast forward to page 19, it was becoming more apparent that the lynch would be between JTB and Auspher.
Because I think he's town and experienced. You seem so dead-set that he's scum, and I just don't see how you could be so positive about that read on D1. Of course, my town read on him is mostly me saying "I cannot see him doing that to himself if he's scum", where in several cases he's brought attention to himself (such as when he went back on his reads and openly admitted to them changing).
My reasoning is far from sound, and JTB's lynch would give us plenty of connections, so I will vote him to avoid a mislynch if it comes down to it.
So, Kantrip still thinks JTB is town, that's great, JTB was town! He stated that he would be willing to vote for JTB, just because it gives him connections. This is 100% contradictory to his previous argument that we shouldn't lynch expierenced players. He believes JTB, one of the best players, is town, yet still would be willing to vote him off.
He created a way for himself to still vote for JTB if it would be a better option.
In the following pages, in every post, his stance on JTB changed ever so slightly from "No, losing expierenced players is bad. Especially if I think they are town" to "I'd be willing to vote off an expierenced townie if he provided some connections." In 417 he basically admits to sheeping with the stronger players even if he doesn't support the lynch.
Then comes the part where an Auspher lynch doesn't seem feasible, because of claiming the main character with VT.
Kan, question:
When you said this, what suddenly made you change your mind over the one post JTB made? Was it his doubting of a clear, as he stated later on the page?
Obviously he needed a justification for his vote, so then what?
JTB, I want to know why your intentions were townie and who you think is scum.
Your gambit specifically. You said the intentions earlier and they didn't match up with what you were really doing.
My intention was a read on TG7 and I got my read on TG7. I don't know what you are getting at.
T-block covered earlier how TG7 was not your focus during the gambit. You didn't even get the town read you say you got until after you were questioned about him remaining null.
Vote:JTB
That's interesting. He states the reason for his vote is how JTB played is his gambit. Let's rewind a bit, to Kantrip's 331.
I'm not sure how to read what JTB did. On one hand, he played a gambit and then focused on other players' reactions to it rather than the subject (TG7) of it. However, he has provided a read on TG& due to his gambit: town. He claimed that this was from a re-read. I don't see why scum would change their read like that on purpose. All it would do is direct scrutiny at them when all they want it to look town. Unless you're insinuating that his reads changing was a slip. From what you're saying about JTB's abilities as scum, I don't think he would have a slip like that.
I have him as town for now, simply because his answers to questions were reasonable where his gambit was poorly executed. A poorly executed gambit comes out looking town more than scum to me, because scum would make sure they do it 100% correctly, would they not?
Wow, now that is a stunning read. The bolded parts are the reasons why he thought was town, yet a few pages later, they are the reason to jump on JTB's wagon, the next easiest target.
I don't think I could have said it better than JTB himself;
His jump on me sucked. He's stated before that he doesn't find me scummy and wouldn't support my lynch, yet once I question ausphers claim, he calls me scummy for reasons still unknown to me and votes me for something I did before stated his town read on me. he's lookking for a way to jump on my wagon and I caught it.
Later on you basically say you opposed T-block's case to get a read on him and this is why you defended JTB.
I call bull**** on this, you can't just say you already agreed but just wanted to oppose him first for a read and expect us to buy it and be all like "oh sure no problem".
If this was your intention, you should have said this the moment you switched to JTB, and not switching to JTB trying to be subtle and having bad logic.