RetrogamerMax
Smash Legend
Well, I guess there is no point in me trying to change your mind about this.Even the best can have a source that is wrong
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well, I guess there is no point in me trying to change your mind about this.Even the best can have a source that is wrong
There are many other characters with dresses/capes/clokes/skirts that people have suggested like Reimu, 2B, Arle, Lloyd, and even Geno. I'm personally not going to really think about this too much and just wait and see.So, apparently Daisy's 'bald spot' was always there according to a good number of people. Do we have proof of this?
I for one think the glitches could be used as properties for upcoming fighters, but can agree with Captain Fun that we do not know how the game is programmed and this could all just be bogus. Still, it is fun to consider since we ain't got nothing better to do.
Also, people are considering 2B because she has a dress/skirt...Possible? I guess it boils down to if Sakurai considers her to be for "Good little boys and good little girls". I will always remember reading up Yoko Taro (The creator of Nier) telling his staff to make 2B's *** PERFECT.
I think the properties/physics of the skirts could point to things like that, but who knows?
Concidering that information (and yes I can believe that he said what he was told) is just dumb, not really.Well, I guess there is no point in me trying to change your mind about this.
Thanks for summarizing - it helps to put things into perspective, and I appreciated the Zoolander reference in part two.There are plenty of reasons as to why this is the case:
This is a really good read! Adding to it, even the topic of Mii Costumes is something that causes divide among the community. I remember putting my Mii Costumes predictions for #6 in this thread and seeing someone sad that I put a wanted character from them as a prediction (Sol Badguy). What I want to say is this: If it was possible, I would prefer that everyone became playable. Unfortunately, we're reaching the end of the road for Ultimate's support (and probably Smash for a while). Honestly, the only thing I have is a list of characters I want to see make into the game (be it playable or as a Mii). I think some are more likely than others, hence the predictions on my signature, but it doesn't mean I don't want character A or B to be playable.There are plenty of reasons as to why this is the case:
History has shown that whenever there's a thing that's popular, people will rise up to **** on it. Justin Bieber songs back in the day is a prime example of this. All the kid ever did was get big off of safe, shallow, ineffectual songs that played on the radio, but because his songs were played absolutely everywhere and were bandied about by numerous people (mostly his target demographic of teenage girls), a large swathe of people rose up to express their annoyance at his sudden and seemingly inescapable popularity.
Geno fans were no different to any other niche Smash character fandom that existed back then. While they were numerous, they were still small enough that those who didn't care could safely ignore them, and nobody every felt threatened by their presence. But several years, one Mii Costume and three NEVER EVERS later, and Geno fans have become incredibly emboldened. They feel much more comfortable in preaching about their love of this character, their incessant demand to see him join Smash. This consequently makes them a bigger target of ridicule from outsiders who either don't understand the hype, don't want the character, or outright don't even care.Not helping matters any is the character they're rallying behind (Geno, in case you've forgotten) is, in terms of video games as a whole, a nobody. He's a random puppet guy from an over 20 year-old game, from a franchise that's already well represented in Smash and that has plenty of other characters who are not only more well known by the general populace, but who are also actually owned by the company who owns that series. In terms of overall relevance to video game history, he's about as big of a name as Din from The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons.
Now contrast that to a character like Crash Bandicoot. Crash was a household name back in the day, and even today is often considered the de facto mascot of the Playstation brand. He's had numerous hit games to his name over the years, and has managed to come back in a huge way as of late, with two successful remakes and a whole new game on the way. As it stands today, Crash is on top of the world, and plenty of people want to see him get into Smash.
This is the crux of the relevancy argument. Due to the immense importance we've placed on a character being part of the playable roster, we begin to feel as though any character who joins the game has to be just as important for us to be able to justify their inclusion, otherwise we'll feel like the slot, and our investment, was wasted. They have to have a legacy that you can point to, they have to be from a big enough franchise, they have to fill in a blank that we feel needs filling, or they need to be a hot enough commodity in video games at large.
Crash has a long line of beloved games, he's a big name in the industry, he'd be the first Playstation/Activision character, and he's Hansel levels of hot right now. Geno is from one well-liked game, he's a relative nobody, he's yet another Mario/SquareEnix character, and the general gaming public doesn't care about him. This dissonance is why people are more fine with discussing the likes of Dante, 2B or Sora and find themselves resenting the mere mention of Geno.As I mentioned in above in Part 1, Geno isn't the first NEVER EVER character to be treated like this by the larger Smash fanbase. Back during the Brawl and Smash 4 days, it was Ridley who recieved the brunt of the ridicule. Despite hailing from one of Nintendo's most popular franchises in the west, a franchise that still gets new games to this day, despite filling in the much-requested niche that was the villain rep, and despite being the series' defining antagonists, due to the sheer volume of people expressing their desire to see him get in as a fighter, other people would shame and mock them in response.
If you've never heard of a heat sink, it's this pronged metal thing that absorbs the heat of appliances and electronics in order to prevent said mechanical devices from overheating. Characters like Ridley are comparable to a heat sink, but for the collective hate of the Smash fandom. A "hate sink", if you will. By being such a large and seemingly impossible addition, bolstered by an incredibly vocal fanbase, he pulled people's hate away from other characters that would otherwise be at the forefront of their rage.
But when Ultimate came around, and when Ridley was finally revealed to be coming to the game at long last, that hate sink was taken away from them. They could no longer mock Ridley as the unlikely NEVER EVER pick, and as such a new hate sink would have to be found. The people very shortly found their next target in King K. Rool, yet another NEVER EVER pick for Smash. This repeated when K. Rool was revealed, which lead them to shift focus to Banjo & Kazooie. And finally, once Banjo & Kazooie were confirmed for the game, Geno became the next big hate sink for those people.Of course, while all of the previous three parts have been major reasons as to why characters like Geno get so much hate, those pale in comparison to this fourth and final point. Now whether people want to admit it or not, Smash fandom isn't merely about supporting the characters you want to see get in, it's also about tearing down the characters you don't want, or at the very least tearing down the ones who are a threat to your character. The logic goes that if you can elimitate your rivals, you'll be able to bolster your character's chances of getting in.
Now of course, in reality, this isn't how it works for the most part. Characters for Smash are chosen for a variety of different reasons. To wit; Inkling and Isabelle were chosen due to their general popularity amongst gamers, Ridley and King K. Rool were chosen due to ranking highly on the Smash Ballot, Chrom and Dark Samus were chosen due to their being popular requests from the east and west respectively, Simon and Richter were chosen as the Castlevania characters over Alucard because they figured the fans would prefer a Belmont, and Incineroar was chosen over Decidueye because Sakurai believed a wrestler character would be more interesting.
So if that's the case, then why do people go to such lengths to tear others down? As I said, this isn't how it works for the most part, but it does work sometimes. Ridley, King K. Rool and Banjo & Kazooie were characters that people wanted in so badly that Sakurai/Nintendo took notice and put them in, and Geno isn't too far removed from that: He's a character that, in spite of his age and lack of widespread relevance, has managed to amass a cadre of loyal devotees who loudly demand that he get put into Smash, and what's more, they've gotten results.
While Geno may not yet be a fighter in Smash, he's already appeared as a Mii Costume in Smash 4, he's appeared in Ultimate as a Spirit, and he's even been acknowledged by Sakurai himself as a character with a lot of popularity behind him, as well as plenty of potential for a moveset. There are so many character fanbases for Smash who wished they got anything close to that. What's more, his costume still hasn't returned as of yet, and there are plenty of rumors and potential leaks that bode well for him.
So with that in mind, is it any wonder why so many people find themselves resenting Geno's popularity, or any other NEVER EVER's popularity? Imagine spending most of your life desparately wishing for your favorite character to get into Smash, only to look on in envy as a character you don't give a **** about not only manages to gain a significant following that carries over from game-to-game, a following that utterly dwarfs the one you have for your character, but also manages to make it into Smash after so long? That's gotta ****ing sting.
This is why I actually respect detractors who just admit Geno makes them seethe. It’s worse seeing other people dismissing mountains of evidence by honing in on 1-2 things and saying “wow that by itself is crazy you Geno fans really like to make **** up!!”>Regularly accused of taking everything at face value and being extremely gullible.
>One of the few fanbases that meticulously investigates and researches things.
Sounds fair to me.
I guess I understand what you mean, though I'm struggling to understand how this is relevant to what I was saying in this part. To clarify, I'm not the one making the argument that any such character will NEVER EVER be in Smash, rather I'm using this as a signifier for the purposes of my actual argument. The term NEVER EVER refers to characters who, in spite of their popularity, are largely considered unlikely for Smash by dissenters. This kind of opinion is near identical when it comes to discussing characters such as Ridley, King K. Rool, Banjo & Kazooie, Waluigi, Isaac, and Geno.I don't agree that is a good argument tho.
Every single character has obstacles to fit in Smash bros, even not considering the roster competition itself. Such as Ridley needs to solve size problem, Geno needs to solve ownership and significance problem, they don't face the same problem so Geno cannot exactly mimick Ridley to get what we want.
Such as my older brother can learn bicycle when he was 3yo, so my mother says I can definitely "do the same"-- learing how to ride bicycle, that makes sense.
But it'd be weird for my mother to say I can learn riding bicycle because my brother passed Oxford medical entrance exam, which has nothing to do with bicycle. His experience cannot help me so I must work on my own.
Plus, like I mentioned in some other thread, we clearly just want to support a specific character, not just to break a rule with any character. Geno isn't the only character that faces copyright and significane issues in the whole Nintendo candidates. Well, for short, there is Mallow. "Never Ever" thing can work for characters outside out support.
I'd just generally say we should recgonize that all Nintendo characters have a shot for Smash bros so we shouldn't say Geno isn't available.
Unfortunately, that's always how other people will look at it. While I don't doubt that's how you feel about it, saying that you'd be happy with a character getting in as a Mii Costume rather than as a fighter implies that you don't really care for said character, and often comes across as insulting to those who do want to see them playable. After all, people typically use arguments like this as an easy way to dismiss characters they don't want, because if a character can be argued to be more likely or better off as a Mii Costume, then the characters that they want are statistically more likely. As I've said, tear down others to bolster your own.This is a really good read! Adding to it, even the topic of Mii Costumes is something that causes divide among the community. I remember putting my Mii Costumes predictions for #6 in this thread and seeing someone sad that I put a wanted character from them as a prediction (Sol Badguy). What I want to say is this: If it was possible, I would prefer that everyone became playable. Unfortunately, we're reaching the end of the road for Ultimate's support (and probably Smash for a while). Honestly, the only thing I have is a list of characters I want to see make into the game (be it playable or as a Mii). I think some are more likely than others, hence the predictions on my signature, but it doesn't mean I don't want character A or B to be playable.
It's also another reason why I have stuck by this fanbase for so long. It's very inquisitive and is willing to entertain new and even weird ideas for the sake of conversation and exploration. There's also the irony that, in light of all the Sabi fallout, there's now a decent sized network of Geno fans that I obviously won't name the names of that full out go out and fact check and cross-check game rumors. I say ironic because, as you all may remember, the main reason I joined Sabi's ranks in late 2018 was to report and research Smash rumors in an ethical way through collaboration and teamwork and obviously that went horribly awry. Thankfully, there's like a dozen Geno fans that managed to create what I couldn't and that makes me very happy that things ultimately worked out.This is why I actually respect detractors who just admit Geno makes them seethe. It’s worse seeing other people dismissing mountains of evidence by honing in on 1-2 things and saying “wow that by itself is crazy you Geno fans really like to make **** up!!”
has this glitch happened to anyone else? I was just taunting when I somehow got hit by something, and then daisy’s whole model turns black? #SmashBros #SmashBrosUltimate #NintendoSwich pic.twitter.com/H0KP3Q30wu
— zach (@stardustpuddle) June 30, 2020
Yep, that is how it is>Regularly accused of taking everything at face value and being extremely gullible.
>One of the few fanbases that meticulously investigates and researches things.
Sounds fair to me.
You might be right. I just wish there was an easier way to recreate these bugs. I'd love to see these other characters to resurface to give myself peace of mind. What would cause these soft body issues start surfacing though?I'll bring your attention to this...has this glitch happened to anyone else? I was just taunting when I somehow got hit by something, and then daisy’s whole model turns black? #SmashBros #SmashBrosUltimate #NintendoSwich pic.twitter.com/H0KP3Q30wu
— zach (@stardustpuddle) June 30, 2020
If you watch it, it's Daisy's whole dress that disappears, not only half of it.
It is clearly a softbody issue caused by the team working from home, so it was really hard to play test everything.
This Daisy and Marth stuff means nothing, and will absolutely be shown to effect more then just those 2.
Likely not; Star Road is based on a location from Super Mario World, and Star Hill has been regularly used by Nintendo after Mario RPG. (the name is generic, but they've been able to use it in several Mario RPGs without issue) It seems like it would be difficult to use Geno in any form without referencing these things, and a game based solely on Geno without any pre-existing Mario elements aside from the characters that first appeared in Mario RPG doesn't seem like it would do all that well, even if it was a lower-budget title.Out of curiosity, is it possible for Square to make a solo game about Geno if they don’t use any OG Mario content?
Most likely not.Out of curiosity, is it possible for Square to make a solo game about Geno if they don’t use any OG Mario content?
Only if they hard rebooted the character but then it's like "what's the point? Why not just create an all new character?"Out of curiosity, is it possible for Square to make a solo game about Geno if they don’t use any OG Mario content?
To me, it always seemed like the deal they made with the new characters was a way of assuring that neither party could work on future titles without the other being involved. It makes sense, and its not like either party realized what was going to happen with the next generation.Likely not; Star Road is based on a location from Super Mario World, and Star Hill has been regularly used by Nintendo after Mario RPG. (the name is generic, but they've been able to use it in several Mario RPGs without issue) It seems like it would be difficult to use Geno in any form without referencing these things, and a game based solely on Geno without any pre-existing Mario elements aside from the characters that first appeared in Mario RPG doesn't seem like it would do all that well, even if it was a lower-budget title.
I reckon Nintendo doesn't see much to gain from it. They tend to shaft side stuff in newer games anyway (the most obvious example that comes to mind is Mario Kart with the roster everyone knows). Maybe with a newer appareance in something and a good reception they could think to try to bring back the characters in some manner. As for SE, the original characters in SMRPG are unique in that they were made for Mario, so they'd look out of place elsewhere. Geno, Mallow, Croco, etc, are all in this weird limbo at the moment. This being said, I dunno why they don't use them in crossovers like Mario Sports Mix, if there was any place to put em, it'd be there. I'd assume Geno wasn't even present in SSDX because AlphaDream was in a pretty bad state money-wise, seeing what happened to them a few months ago, so they didn't try getting the rights again from SE.Is there anyone who could look into the Geno situation and find out why square won’t give the rights to Nintendo or why they won’t use him or even why Nintendo won’t try and gain the rights for him
I remember someone doing it for Isaac after he was revealed as an assist trophy. The wanted to know why he wasn’t upgraded when he had a fanbase and he found out that Nintendo didn’t think the fanbase was big enough to be a playable character so they brought him back as an assist to acknowledge the fans they wanted him.
Maybe they knew they were working on Hero, and they made Isaac an AT because they thought he would be a little too similar to Hero, even though he had some things that stood him out from the other guy? I dunno.Is there anyone who could look into the Geno situation and find out why square won’t give the rights to Nintendo or why they won’t use him or even why Nintendo won’t try and gain the rights for him
I remember someone doing it for Isaac after he was revealed as an assist trophy. The wanted to know why he wasn’t upgraded when he had a fanbase and he found out that Nintendo didn’t think the fanbase was big enough to be a playable character so they brought him back as an assist to acknowledge the fans they wanted him.
The idea of Geno appearing in something like Final Fantasy 7 Remake part 2 with that ultra real anime artstyle is hilarious to me.I reckon Nintendo doesn't see much to gain from it. They tend to shaft side stuff in newer games anyway (the most obvious example that comes to mind is Mario Kart with the roster everyone knows). Maybe with a newer appareance in something and a good reception they could think to try to bring back the characters in some manner. As for SE, the original characters in SMRPG are unique in that they were made for Mario, so they'd look out of place elsewhere. Geno, Mallow, Croco, etc, are all in this weird limbo at the moment. This being said, I dunno why they don't use them in crossovers like Mario Sports Mix, if there was any place to put em, it'd be there. I'd assume Geno wasn't even present in SSDX because AlphaDream was in a pretty bad state money-wise, seeing what happened to them a few months ago, so they didn't try getting the rights again from SE.
I think the only Final Fantasy game Geno could appear in reasonably would be a new Dissidia.The idea of Geno appearing in something like Final Fantasy 7 Remake part 2 with that ultra real anime artstyle is hilarious to me.
I mean...you have a cat that wears a crown and robe and rides a giant toy moogle. I could see it lol.The idea of Geno appearing in something like Final Fantasy 7 Remake part 2 with that ultra real anime artstyle is hilarious to me.
Blessed from the the great papa himself. Yeah, GodzillaGuy64 was the one who posted it on smashboards, so much love for him for gifting us it.
— GuardianOfStarRoad🦍 (@road_guardian) July 4, 2020
No prob.Never thought I’d see the day where my dumb edits I make in 5 seconds are shared outside of the thread. To whoever runs the Twitter account, I thank you so much.Blessed from the the great papa himself. Yeah, GodzillaGuy64 was the one who posted it on smashboards, so much love for him for gifting us it.
— GuardianOfStarRoad🦍 (@road_guardian) July 4, 2020
Edit: Although to be clear, I did not make the tinfoil Geno hat. I just put it on the normal Geno. I do not remember who made the tinfoil hat.
Yeah I don't blame you. The Smash community has been up in ARMS lately. [Pun Intended].Hey Genobros? With all the madness that's going on within the competitive Smash community and some players I looked up to either being exposed or coming forward has been really hitting me like a truck the past few days. For that reason I decided to take a break from SmashBoards and most of Smash in general for the time being. I'll still be around on the Star Road discord, and I'll definitely come back when I feel the time is right (or when the next character is revealed, whichever comes first), but I just need some time to myself for a bit.
Wish everyone the best.
Don't think so. I remember some tweet from someone saying that if they were to add more than a certain amount of characters, possibly after the second fighters pass, the game would crash.So I remember hearing papagenos mention in his last video that extra stage slots were added to the game's memory according to dataminers I believe. If they can add more memory for the stage selection, do you guys think they can do the same for the memory for the character selection?