Proofreading is now done and, not surprisingly, I added almost 200 more words in the process. Now I'm just kind of glassy eyed but I'll address something a TON of people have asked me since I came out with the name Dragonborn.
AdamBel731
Could Dragonborn be leakbait for Doom Guy? Yes. Do I think that's the case? No. Why? Reasons... (Imagine if I stopped there.)
1. Lots of people have been warning people about this for months.
Smash tends to "end" on "low notes." Yes, tons of people have chewed me out for calling Dragon Born a low note but, in the Smash bubble, people aren't exactly happy with the prospect (and my inbox on multiple sites is definitely proof of that). It's kind of like a Wolf/Krystal situation in Brawl but one obviously has a much more vocal fanbase. Skyrim is an absolutely beloved game and would be perfectly fine as an addition to Smash. I've gone into details why I think it's a logical choice based on theory crafting. Smash has never ended on a super popular character and, in my own speculation, I don't think Nintendo would have "warned us" back in September if they thought 5 was going to go over super well with everyone. This is another reason why I entertained Lloyd and Nightmare, because plenty of people complained about those characters too for their own set of reasons. As someone who has been here for Brawl, Smash 4, and Ultimate speculation, I can look at you all as a grizzled old man and could say that 5 would probably be a "low note" even if I wasn't theorycrafting or privy to insider stuff.
2. The situation isn't comparable to Steve and Banjo.
The reasons so many people believed in Steve over Banjo because people claimed that there was fake photos and even videos going around of him in Smash. In other words, Microsoft was full ass invested in a misinformation campaign on the character. Yes, those are tall claims but it honestly makes sense given how multiple insiders lived and died on that hill. There's nothing currently out there to suggest that for Dragonborn. No insiders aside from some contacts of my friends have outright said "holy ****, guys; here comes Dragonborn." People have taken to speculation and theorycrafting. Some insiders have left very cryptic hints to other insiders. That being said, there isn't the full on confidence that many insiders had for Steve. The people who are the most confident in this have kind of yeeted themselves out of existence or avoid the topic entirely. This is also why I've been getting a lot of **** because I'm confident based on my own theorycrafting and going against insiders and contacts is (checks notes) supposedly death threat worthy according to the Smash fanbase but whatever... I literally have no attachment to the character so the number of people who are absolutely furious at me for making this prediction is miserably ironic. Fun fact; I've never played Skyrim.
3. People have been saying "No Doom Guy" for months now.
I keep warning people that taking messages at face value is probably a good idea. Grant Kirkhope is a composer. He has no ownership of the Banjo IP outside of the original music. He's no longer an employee of RARE either and hasn't been for a longtime either. I believe he's a free lance video game composer now. He can lie in whatever capacity he wants and nobody can fault him for it. In the cases of Travis, Sora, and Doom Guy, there's significantly less incentive for full-on executives to lie about this stuff. These are respected men in the industry and their words are worth a lot. They have authority and control over million dollar IPs. To be totally blunt, for them to outright lie would be really ****ing bad, especially for the two in Japanese business culture. Professionalism is taken with a degree of grave seriousness. People laugh and point out that "ha ha, Kamiya is such a scoundrel", yeah, but he's definitely an outlier and a lot of his colleagues full on resent him because of his lack of professionalism. Your typical executive is not going to tell fans to eat **** on Twitter. These guys are suit and tie for most of these things.
"Well, why would they tell the truth to random interviewers?" Because there's definitely a value in that and not thinking you can just freely lie to people because they're "not as important as you." This is why I have confidants as young as 14 and as old as late 40's because I hate the idea of assuming that people aren't trustworthy based on age alone. Plus, all in all, there's plenty of ways to avoid situations like this. As someone who has been interviewed for a wide variety of reasons over the reasons, you can specifically ask for questions to not be recorded. Sometimes people "oops" during interviews or just super uncomfortable with certain things being said being blasted. This being said, these men had absolutely no objections to saying "we have no plans for these characters in Smash at this time" being part of the public record even though they had the right and power to just flat out say "hey man, don't include that part in your write up or I will legally squash you because I did not consent to it." Brass tacks, interviews are all about consent and, yes, people can be sued if they don't respect interviewees requests.
So, there's all that...