Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I’m not 3D modeler, but i think trophies wouldn’t have a skeleton and therefore would be harder to repurpose than a mii costume was, but it could still happen. The only trophy I could see happening is Rayman tbh. Then again I could be talking out of my ass lol
That’s what I’ve been thinking too. They probably found more info on Doomguy after the Cacomallow leak, even if it was fake
i'm feeling fine, how'bout you?
If we remember the Seven Squares list and think about what happened, those names would be out to the public in no time. I do believe people got FIRED for those names getting out. So yes, it is pretty damnable, especially when we, the internet, go "OMG Norman Reedus, Sindel, Pacman Jr and Slipknot are the fighters!!! Hyuck hyuck!"
I've been doing m'kay, m'kay.
Probably just the leaker and their insider source or sources within the companies that would be in deep doo doo. But other people that are hearing stuff from them and ain't leaking anything like
Fatmanonice
is safe.Wait what? I didn't hear about this.
Are we expecting this to have a leak of Challenger pack 5 in a few days after this?
Basically just that duck hunt and mii swordfighter started glitching when plant came out, and people speculated that it's because they were being used as a base for a new character. This was part of the reason I and many others were confident in Banjo and Kazooie. Of course that did end up panning out. Most assumed mii was for Erdrick, who was thought to be child form at the time because of the Brave stats datamine. Then we all just kind of forgot about it when Hero came out and was clearly based on Link rather than mii swordfighter. So now I'm thinking mii swordfighter is for Lloyd.So now that more people are accepting that Lloyd might be the Namco rep and FP5 or one of the future DLC chaaracters,Sigran101 would you care to enlighten the crowd about your Mii Sword Fighter theory?
1. Riviera: The Promised Land
That was about LAST YEAR'S VGA. Not current. I am trying to find that post now.
So I don't want to dive too hard into this again as I'm only going to be repeating myself and I want to focus on my big positive Geno Bro message, but here it the problem with your statement just like that popular Youtuber who acted all coy about saying he enjoyed Sw/Sh.
SpiritOfRuin
because they see it as art while I see it as a product being sold for entertainment, and thus they think it can't be objectively judged where as I most certainly believe it can. It's technically both of those things, but I'm not judging it for anything less or more than it's poor quality and the stupid lies GameFreak has made.Now that I've had at you for that, I will say I'm interested in this, as I'm basically a step away from confidently saying to expect LLoyd as FP#5.So now that more people are accepting that Lloyd might be the Namco rep and FP5 or one of the future DLC chaaracters,
Which is amusing as ever since the Fighter Pass was announced, every 'leak' had Doom Guy associated with it. As each character came out, Doom Guy was coming off as Vergeben's Minecraft content claim, constantly insisted that they were coming.
As someone with the vaguest experience with 3D modeling, the trophies likely have some sort of basic skeleton but it would of course be a significant undertaking to make a character starting from just a trophy. That being said, it’s still something, so they could still start with that as some base resources.
I’m trying my best not to hold onto hope of it being real all along, but man... it’d just be so hype
That’s a good point actually lol, he was in so many fake 4chan leaks but never anything “real”, so if he does end up being the final character after all it’d be pretty funny lol
Yo, Steve main, you ragin' right now. Big sales =/= a good game. It's still an average game at best, regardless if people buy it a lot or not. That's like saying an undercooked chicken sandwich is suddenly a perfect chicken sandwich just because tons of people buy that undercooked sandwich. None of this is stupid: it's a serious issue in our time where people think that paying for something for a company they like or something they enjoy is much more important than having standards. Also, so much has come out about how GameFreak treats Pokemon that you really can't defend them. They are bad at coding and have been since GSC and now they don't have Iwata to keep them looking nice behind the scenes.
I think I'm allowed to decide if certain features are not to my liking or worth the 60 dollars. I'm not saying it's a bad game, but I AM saying it's not good enough for me. (At least not until it goes on sale in 20never)
Yeah I agree with this, Lloyd is the next most likely “asset reusing” character after our boi imo, which makes me think he might be 6 or 7 instead of 5.
If Joker could be revealed at the VGA then so can Lloyd Irving.
Again I don't think you're really looking at what I'm saying because I am talking about them both as "art" if you will and a product. I said several times that not everyone will enjoy it and it depends on what is important to you in a game (product). I get that you don't want to support Gamefreak and have no interest in buying a game that you deem lazy and low quality. And I also said there were odd choices made by the development team and some down right infuriating aspects in typical Gamefreak fashion. But overall, a lot of things that seemed lacklaster and that I was worried would be unexciting ended up being really enjoyable (for me; this is opinion). Everyone should not go buy these games as I already said people already have or are not going to go get it and very few are on the fence and that's fine. What I'm saying is not that people should go buy it to see if it's good. What I'm saying is that if you want to be a resource about something, then you have to have experienced that thing. We were discussing a post that listed cons with evidence about sword/shield but the list was clearly designed by someone who was negatively biased and had not played the games making them an ineffective resource. I very clearly don't think it's unfair for people to have opposing opinions but it doesn't change the fact that these games looked terrible to me from the outside but are entirely different beast as an experience.So I don't want to dive too hard into this again as I'm only going to be repeating myself and I want to focus on my big positive Geno Bro message, but here it the problem with your statement just like that popular Youtuber who acted all coy about saying he enjoyed Sw/Sh.
It's fine that you enjoyed it, but you can have fun playing Kick The Can or Playing Pretend or climbing a tree. You can have fun with friends and family, and you can enjoy things that are of poor quality. Once again, I love the Puppet Master franchise, but it's a really ****ty C-Horror Movie series. It's really just bad and convoluted and makes no sense as well as not being made all that well from filming aspects...but I love it all the same. However, I acknowledge it's poor quality...but you are dismissing Sw/Sh's poor qualities. The issue here is acting as if Sw/Sh have no issues or that they don't matter because the game is fun just because 'i LoVe PoKeMoN sO i WiLl BuY iT cUz YoU aReN't' issue.
I'm not saying you can't have fun, that's the point of an entertainment product. It's one of the things I disagree with with
Also, I'm not going to play the game, but I have gathered the obvious facts of it's flaws vs it's features and frankly, it doesn't hold up. Like I said, it's at best a 5/10, and average game but could very easily be below average for the lack of effort put into it.
Thus, here is your issue: since you had fun, you think it's unfair for people to judge it harshly, especially if they didn't play the game. But, isn't it unfair of you to tell people to buy a game that they see as not worth their money? By your logic, every person who buys anything should not do any research about the product beforehand and just buy it outright, then decide if it's worth the money they already paid. Newsflash: good consumerism does not work like that. If a restaurant gets bad reviews, people who have never been there skip it and go somewhere else. If a movie gets panned by other movie goers, people use that information to go see a different movie. For most products nowadays, you don't just get your money back and (assuming you bought it brand new) people don't want to support companies who don't care about the consumer's wants and make poor products. Jesus, imagine if investors just invested in every single thing out there without proper research...my god...
So no, just because YOU had fun doesn't mean that everyone should just go blindly buy Sw/Sh now. Some people don't enjoy poor quality products, myself being one of them in terms of video games. GameFreak screwed the pooch on this one, and just because they are selling a lot of copies to people who don't pay attention or blind devotees doesn't mean this won't come back to bite them later on. I mean, we were on this thing talking about how The Last Jedi did well in the box office despite the controversy, but Solo bombed hard and Star Wars has been bombing on most fronts since then. It's only a matter of time...
Now that I've had at you for that, I will say I'm interested in this, as I'm basically a step away from confidently saying to expect LLoyd as FP#5.
What be this theory? I'm wondering if I heard it already.
EDIT: Nvm I was too slow, and I have heard about that theory. That said, we've had characters glitching out with Terry recently that likely lead to nothing, so that does throw a slight monkey wrench into that old theory.
The conversation naturally flowed from them trying to piece together what happened to them implicitly blaming Luke for what happened to Akzeriuth, because they remember that Luke was the one at the Sephiroth Tree. Luke only began to defend himself when the conversation turned to him.
Mieu only chimed in when everyone has already said their peace and left the room in anger, and even then Mieu doesn't agree with him that it wasn't his fault, rather he reinforces it. Luke DID mess up, and it's all his fault. His attempt to cheer Luke up basically amounted to "I know you did this awful thing, but that's okay because I've also done a similarly terrible thing, and thus I know how terribly you're feeling right now". It's an attempt at empathy which falls flat because empathy isn't what Luke necessarily wanted.
You're referring to the skit "Responsibility", right?
But that doesn't mean he's not blaming Luke for it in part. Ion sharing in Luke's blame doesn't absolve Luke of any blame, it reinforces it.
Luke was getting defensive because everyone was blaming him for what happened, either in part or in whole, which is exactly what happened in that scene and a good deal beyond. Honestly, I don't blame him for being defensive when everybody in the party is trying to blame him for something he feels he wasn't responsible for. And why exactly should Luke take responsibility for what happened anyways? He was only doing what Van told him, and at the time he wholeheartedly trusted Van like a father, so he had no reason to doubt Van when he told him that he had found a way to save Akzeriuth.
I’m not frickin blind nor are a lot of other people, and I know just ‘cause it sells a lot doesn’t mean it’s good, but a lot of people actually do think it’s good. There’s flaws and Game Freak seems to lack some know-how since there are a couple of weird things even a game made in a year shouldn’t have, but that we’re somehow bad consumers for liking it? Stop it with that crap. People already have to put up with a bunch of toxic fricks spamming hate and rage on twitter and reddit, and even “optimistic” people whom are also toxic and pretend there aren’t any sort of flaws - though, really, the flaws may not even be “flaws” to them. And are we sure GF owns most of TPC? Because Creatures and Nintendo also own a good chunk of it, and whoever is in charge of TPC as a whole does a bunch of stuff without GF with the only thing GF does being making the mainline games. I think it’s telling how there’s only a year between each generation now despite not working with sprites anymore.
If they are actual leakbait and Nintendo is infact the one pushing the names, yes. The thing about leakbait is that it's not always always like throwing paper flyers out of an airplane. Sometimes it's a lot more selective and certain departments or even certain people are deliberately told false info as a sort of "test" and it makes it easier to track if a certain name does get made public.
Ultimate currently has Rathalos in the triple role of boss/assist trophy/spirit, plus a couple music tracks... and that's about it.
Woah there. First off, I never said you must buy it. If you don't want to you don't have to. But you aren't qualified to tell others ehether it's a good game or not unless you've actually played it. I had quite ablast with it. It's honestly one of yhe best gens in recent memory imo. But you wouldn't know. You can cite other reviewers. You can tell me technical things you don't like. But you can't tell me you know it's a bad game if you haven't played it. This is the same thing as people attacking potential smash characters because they don't like the idea of the character even though they've never even tried it. Playing a game is a very different experience than reading reviews and complaining about them online.So I don't want to dive too hard into this again as I'm only going to be repeating myself and I want to focus on my big positive Geno Bro message, but here it the problem with your statement just like that popular Youtuber who acted all coy about saying he enjoyed Sw/Sh.
It's fine that you enjoyed it, but you can have fun playing Kick The Can or Playing Pretend or climbing a tree. You can have fun with friends and family, and you can enjoy things that are of poor quality. Once again, I love the Puppet Master franchise, but it's a really ****ty C-Horror Movie series. It's really just bad and convoluted and makes no sense as well as not being made all that well from filming aspects...but I love it all the same. However, I acknowledge it's poor quality...but you are dismissing Sw/Sh's poor qualities. The issue here is acting as if Sw/Sh have no issues or that they don't matter because the game is fun just because 'i LoVe PoKeMoN sO i WiLl BuY iT cUz YoU aReN't' issue.
I'm not saying you can't have fun, that's the point of an entertainment product. It's one of the things I disagree with with
Also, I'm not going to play the game, but I have gathered the obvious facts of it's flaws vs it's features and frankly, it doesn't hold up. Like I said, it's at best a 5/10, and average game but could very easily be below average for the lack of effort put into it.
Thus, here is your issue: since you had fun, you think it's unfair for people to judge it harshly, especially if they didn't play the game. But, isn't it unfair of you to tell people to buy a game that they see as not worth their money? By your logic, every person who buys anything should not do any research about the product beforehand and just buy it outright, then decide if it's worth the money they already paid. Newsflash: good consumerism does not work like that. If a restaurant gets bad reviews, people who have never been there skip it and go somewhere else. If a movie gets panned by other movie goers, people use that information to go see a different movie. For most products nowadays, you don't just get your money back and (assuming you bought it brand new) people don't want to support companies who don't care about the consumer's wants and make poor products. Jesus, imagine if investors just invested in every single thing out there without proper research...my god...
So no, just because YOU had fun doesn't mean that everyone should just go blindly buy Sw/Sh now. Some people don't enjoy poor quality products, myself being one of them in terms of video games. GameFreak screwed the pooch on this one, and just because they are selling a lot of copies to people who don't pay attention or blind devotees doesn't mean this won't come back to bite them later on. I mean, we were on this thing talking about how The Last Jedi did well in the box office despite the controversy, but Solo bombed hard and Star Wars has been bombing on most fronts since then. It's only a matter of time...
Now that I've had at you for that, I will say I'm interested in this, as I'm basically a step away from confidently saying to expect LLoyd as FP#5.
What be this theory? I'm wondering if I heard it already.
EDIT: Nvm I was too slow, and I have heard about that theory. That said, we've had characters glitching out with Terry recently that likely lead to nothing, so that does throw a slight monkey wrench into that old theory.
THIS. THIS, people! If nothing else, I should think we can all agree that yearly releases are just stupid. Period. Good things take time, especially video games. As a production engineer I can tell you, rushing technical things will give you **** EVERY TIME. You want quality? Don't cut corners, don't make excuses, and don't be too freaking cheap. This annual release thing is putting itself solidly into "cash-grab" territory and that's not how you make an epic game. Why do you think Metroid Prime 4 had to restart development? Why do you think it's taken this long to make it? Why do mainline Zelda games usually only come once or twice in a console's lifetime? Because good stuff takes time. And to those of you that think Swish is so great, imagine what GF could have done with another year of development? How about two? Yeah, annual releases need to burn in hell where they belong.
I have probably the most interesting relationship with Mario Sunshine of any Mario title. I think FLUDD was a great gimmick and the platforming segments without him are probably some of the best in the history of the franchise. There are points where the game is brutally difficult which is rare for a Mario title and for people like me, welcome, but there's also so many times that the difficulty comes from getting bull****ted or just needless tedium. I often recount my time playing it like a war story - it was a great time but man was there some unforgettable atrocities that I had to live through, too.
[/QUOTE]
I really didn’t want to jump back in to this conversation... but “you can’t say something’s a bad game if you haven’t played it” isn’t a great take, especially in the era of LPs and streams.
Is it weird that I 100% agree that Sunshine has some absolute bs nonsense that it asks you to do and I love that it has that? Like I love the kind of jank and weirdness it throws at you, I don’t know why
