• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Geno (♥♪!?): Return of the Starsend Savior

Status
Not open for further replies.

Grumbo

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
673
:Skims through the past however months it’s been since I posted here:

Well damn. This Mii Costume leak seems fairly promising. Geno Mii Costume or not is looking pretty inevitable to me. Though I do have one question: Do you think after fighter five they’d add more with the bonus fighters? I really want to see some more costumes like Sans so it’d feel like every fan at least got something if their bro isn’t made into a fully fleshed out character.



Oh thank god my son is still possible.
Im pretty sure they will. We’re still missing a bunch of costumes, and I think we’ll get something capcom post-pass, so they’ll probably be dropped there. They already made all these models so theyd lose money just sitting on them.
What is the point of spending your free time on a thread just to tell people not to be hopeful or excited? Things point positively towards Geno coming in as DLC so people are excited about that fact. If it doesn’t work out then that’s disappointing but so what? Fair weather fans will choose to ditch him and bandwagon some other character and the rest of us will just hope he gets in a future installment. So I don’t see why people who explicitly say they don’t even want him in the freaking game make excuses to spend so much time in a character support thread. Like there are perfectly fine general newcomer speculation threads out there where you can do literally the same thing.
Honestly I’m getting tired of hype police. Just let us have our fun for goodness sake. We’re on the verge of greatness and we still have people dropping in telling us to “temper our expectations”.
 

StarLight42

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
1,683
Keep in mind that “I can only see a future where there’s more of then” might mean Sakurai sees a future where there’s more pesky fan requests, not a future where said requests will be granted. Sak does like to complain a lot, after all
 

Wish7s

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
36
Location
New Jersey
I don't like the mindset of "hype responsibly," I'd rather be positive and hopeful for him because either way I'll be a sad if he doesn't make it in. Setting our expectations lower doesn't do anything because deep down no matter what we tell ourselves we'd all be a little upset if Geno doesn't make it, no matter if we "lowered our expectations" or not. Be positive friends
 

Ayumi Tachibana

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
537
Keep in mind that “I can only see a future where there’s more of then” might mean Sakurai sees a future where there’s more pesky fan requests, not a future where said requests will be granted. Sak does like to complain a lot, after all
He is not saying "more requests will be granted", rather he is concerning about more requests coming to him. The original text isn't a vague statement by any means.
I don't understand how that Nintendo Everything's translation went in total opposite meaning. I mean, where the hell did that exclamation mark come from?
 
Last edited:

SpiritOfRuin

Smash Ace
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
737
What I wonder is this: What do y'all plan on doing if Geno doesn't make it?

I think I will focus on seeing if Nintendo or Square would be willing to work on a new Mario RPG, personally, one with Geno actually involved in some way. Considering how well they're getting on again, with Square even willing to make exclusives for them, I could see it happen. I also feel like fan projects would be a great way to keep Geno (and better yet, Mallow, as well!) alive.

I think he's likely to make it this time, but just in case he doesn't, I'm brainstorming what kinda stuff might happen afterward. I'm still very satisfied with Ultimate itself, given I got 3/4 of my most wanteds, of course... but I hope Geno comes back somehow, some way. :drflip:
I've said it before but if Geno doesn't get in I'll be really disappointed, but I will understand that other characters simply had the priority in Nintendo's eyes. I'm certainly not so blinded by my love for Geno that I don't see the value in many other characters. I actually think I would stick around here. I think it's a good idea for us (regardless of the outcome) to band together for a thank you letter to the Smash team for this amazing game. I also wonder what kind of sway we could have on the possibility of a new SMRPG between SE and Nintendo. Like if SE is simply not on board which seems unlikely I'm really curious if we have the power to raise funds for Nintendo to buy the rights to SMRPG Content from SE. I would be totally on board with helping with and organizing some kind of fundraiser like that if it were plausible. Also, I will keep making Smash movesets and lurking in other character threads and supporting other characters I like like Rayman and Crash.
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
Yee of little faith, just remember that, according to fatman, we have AT LEAST five spots (including FP5) left. As stingy and Square can be, id be very surprised if they dont have another dlc. With Cloud and Hero out the way, and Sora being owned by Disney (Square would probably make little money on him, especially if he came with no spirits) the path is cleared for Geno.
Don't forget that two of those spots are going to be claim by Byleth & a Pokemon Sword & Shield rep because Sakurai LOVES to put the newest FE Protagonist in when the game is relevant and there's an obligation to put the newest Pokemon in there. So it went from 5 down to 2 because there's no way Geno is the fifth Fighters Pass character.
 

StarLight42

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
1,683
He is not saying "more requests will be granted", rather he is concerning about more requests coming to him. The original text isn't a vague statement by any means.
I don't understand how that Nintendo Everything's translation went in total opposite meaning. I mean, where the hell did that exclamation mark come from?
Yeah this is what I suspected
 

The Anigriffin

Smash Lord
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
1,609
Im pretty sure they will. We’re still missing a bunch of costumes, and I think we’ll get something capcom post-pass, so they’ll probably be dropped there. They already made all these models so theyd lose money just sitting on them.

Honestly I’m getting tired of hype police. Just let us have our fun for goodness sake. We’re on the verge of greatness and we still have people dropping in telling us to “temper our expectations”.
I’m also hoping that we get some more Mii Costumes for characters that have a bit of a following but have a roadblock to being a complete character such as Masked Man or some of the current Assist Trophies that don’t already have them such as Krystal.
 

waterhasataste

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
491
Location
Earth
Don't forget that two of those spots are going to be claim by Byleth & a Pokemon Sword & Shield rep because Sakurai LOVES to put the newest FE Protagonist in when the game is relevant and there's an obligation to put the newest Pokemon in there. So it went from 5 down to 2 because there's no way Geno is the fifth Fighters Pass character.
Can't tell if you're serious or not, but I do not see this happening. Fatmanonice has stated all the DLC rumored characters he heard so far a good and will likely please people

FE is done I think. Sakurai didn't even want Corrin at first, he had to be convinced to add them in and I believe he acknowledged himself that he felt there was too much Fire Emblem. I highly doubt we'll get anymore

Pokemon's obligation pick seems directed at the base game. We've yet to have yet to see if this stretches to DLC. Possible, but I have strong doubts

Also, remember that Nintendo is picking the DLC again this time. I remember too when people were speculating Nintendo would pick an FE character as DLC before they announced Joker. All the DLC so far has been entirely 3rd party, and I expect them to continue that trend
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
Can't tell if you're serious or not, but I do not see this happening. Fatmanonice has stated all the DLC rumored characters he heard so far a good and will likely please people

FE is done I think. Sakurai didn't even want Corrin at first, he had to be convinced to add them in and I believe he acknowledged himself that he felt there was too much Fire Emblem. I highly doubt we'll get anymore

Pokemon's obligation pick seems directed at the base game. We've yet to have yet to see if this stretches to DLC. Possible, but I have strong doubts

Also, remember that Nintendo is picking the DLC again this time. I remember too when people were speculating Nintendo would pick an FE character as DLC before they announced Joker. All the DLC so far has been entirely 3rd party, and I expect them to continue that trend
Well first off, just because Fatmanonice heard that the rumored characters will likely please people doesn't mean much since it can always turned out to be fake. Not saying he's spreading fake info, but in the pass month we went from "Oh Ryu, Reimu, or Crash are going going to be the fifth fighter. Many insiders are believing this. Wait, we got more info and turns out that that none of these character are making it in." Information chances up a lot, so what one insider may have heard might not be a 100% true due to how information is given out. Remember, there was a time when insiders agreed that it was Steve getting in over Banjo, and there was Star Fox Grand Prix that turned out to be a hoax.

We'll most likely going to get another FE rep, especially with how successful Three House was. Main reason why we didn't get one for the current Fighters Pass was definitely due to when that game came out. If ARMS & Xenoblade 2 were off the table then anything in 2019 isn't going to happen. But with this new DLC those 2019 games are in the realm of consideration. Plus I wouldn't use Sakurai's statement that he believe that there's too many FE character as any merit when not long ago he said that making more DLC wouldn't be profitable and would be best to save all ideas for the next game. He chances his mind a lot.

Pokemon can still be part of the DLC. Back in Smash 4 they already put in the latest Pokemon from X & Y and DLC was finished back in 2015, so there was no other reason to include anymore Pokemon when the next game didn't release until November 2016. Now we have a Pokemon game being released around the time Smash Bros is continuing to add in fighters. So wouldn't they add the news Sword & Shield Pokemon to Smash Bros as DLC? That obligation is most likely going to still be part of the DLC decision.

Also I don't buy the fact that Nintendo was the one picking the DLC, I think that Sakurai just said that so that he didn't have to heard anyone being sad about their favorites not getting in and can just say "don't blame me, blame Nintendo." We heard that Sakurai wanted characters like Joker & Hero during interviews. And with a character like Terry Bogard, yeah Sakurai definitely was the one who was deciding these characters. Just because we've been having nothing but third parties doesn't mean that the next DLC can't be some first party characters like Fire Emblem & Pokemon. Every time Sakurai makes a new Smash Bros game he's very consistent with those two franchises. It's not that far of a stretch to think that we won't get those two added in this newest Smash Bros DLC.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Does anyone know why Square Enix wanted and owned the rights of SMRPG characters in the first place?
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I’m also hoping that we get some more Mii Costumes for characters that have a bit of a following but have a roadblock to being a complete character such as Masked Man or some of the current Assist Trophies that don’t already have them such as Krystal.
I just need a Captain Syrup Mii costume with a Wario Land song and I'll be good.
 

waterhasataste

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
491
Location
Earth
Well first off, just because Fatmanonice heard that the rumored characters will likely please people doesn't mean much since it can always turned out to be fake. Not saying he's spreading fake info, but in the pass month we went from "Oh Ryu, Reimu, or Crash are going going to be the fifth fighter. Many insiders are believing this. Wait, we got more info and turns out that that none of these character are making it in." Information chances up a lot, so what one insider may have heard might not be a 100% true due to how information is given out. Remember, there was a time when insiders agreed that it was Steve getting in over Banjo, and there was Star Fox Grand Prix that turned out to be a hoax.

We'll most likely going to get another FE rep, especially with how successful Three House was. Main reason why we didn't get one for the current Fighters Pass was definitely due to when that game came out. If ARMS & Xenoblade 2 were off the table then anything in 2019 isn't going to happen. But with this new DLC those 2019 games are in the realm of consideration. Plus I wouldn't use Sakurai's statement that he believe that there's too many FE character as any merit when not long ago he said that making more DLC wouldn't be profitable and would be best to save all ideas for the next game. He chances his mind a lot.

Pokemon can still be part of the DLC. Back in Smash 4 they already put in the latest Pokemon from X & Y and DLC was finished back in 2015, so there was no other reason to include anymore Pokemon when the next game didn't release until November 2016. Now we have a Pokemon game being released around the time Smash Bros is continuing to add in fighters. So wouldn't they add the news Sword & Shield Pokemon to Smash Bros as DLC? That obligation is most likely going to still be part of the DLC decision.

Also I don't buy the fact that Nintendo was the one picking the DLC, I think that Sakurai just said that so that he didn't have to heard anyone being sad about their favorites not getting in and can just say "don't blame me, blame Nintendo." We heard that Sakurai wanted characters like Joker & Hero during interviews. And with a character like Terry Bogard, yeah Sakurai definitely was the one who was deciding these characters. Just because we've been having nothing but third parties doesn't mean that the next DLC can't be some first party characters like Fire Emblem & Pokemon. Every time Sakurai makes a new Smash Bros game he's very consistent with those two franchises. It's not that far of a stretch to think that we won't get those two added in this newest Smash Bros DLC.
I can understand the first point. However we can see so far that consistently, the characters that are largely talked about are all 3rd parties. What is the reason for this? The fact that consistently, every DLC fighter pass character has been 3rd party. It's true rumors can change, but this is something that's been incredibly consistent when it comes to rumored or leaked characters

Yes, Fire Emblem did well, however I don't think that means they are a lock to receive DLC. Chances are, the next wave of DLC was decided before Three Houses came out. Before the success of it started to show. Like I've stated, it would be extremely mistaken to think that more DLC planning was just recently. Given the rate these characters are coming out, It's far more likely they planned out further in advance before we knew about it. I think part of the reason Sakurai began talking about being worried about future DLC is because more of it was in talks when he made that statement. Speaking of his statements, yes he can change his mind. But that doesn't mean that everything he states will be flipped in the future. He's been pretty consistent with the video game character rule right? Unless he updates his statements, I think it's a fair to use them as potentially meaning something. Even you have quoted Sakurai yourself to defend your points, but then you also say we shouldn't rely on said statements

You are right. Smash 4 added a new Pokemon in the base game. Keyword, base game. Same for Ultimate. We have no precident that the newest Pokemon have to be added in as DLC. DLC is a different from base game. Developing content for a pre-existing game is handled differently than a base one. We have to wait and see on this, and maybe you are right. However I don't think we can claim just yet that it's a lock that we're getting a new Pokemon. Especially given the pattern of DLC so far and how there's no precident for it

It's a silly claim to me that Sakurai would use Nintendo as a cover. Yes, I'm sure Nintendo will be pleased with a worker of theirs going public and saying to blame the company rather than him. I really don't think Sakurai cares whether or not people get upset at him for not including certain characters. He's smart enough to know that he can't please everyone. Also, Joker was a big deal and was pretty positive. Hero was a big pick for Japan. Banjo Kazooie satisfied a bunch of people. There were some good picks here, why would Sakurai be concerned that people would annoy him about it? Especially since we got Banjo. Yes he's played a bunch of the games the characters came from, but guess what? Sakurai plays a bunch of games. He's stated that he owns a bunch of games. He loves Minecraft and Nier, I haven't seen them in Smash yet. I don't buy he was lying so Nintendo can take the blame instead. Were there details left out of that statement? Maybe. But I don't think it's a false statement

Yes we have a precident for Pokemon and FE characters. But we already got them in the Base Game. This is additional content. DLC. A whole different ball park. You yourself have stated the DLC is different from the base game picks. We're in a different scenario now. So we have to look at what has happened so far that matches closely with this scenario and so far, every DLC character has been 3rd party. I get the direction might change, but it's been working so well so far, that I don't think they'd change it so suddenly
 

OffBi

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 30, 2019
Messages
877
Does anyone know why Square Enix wanted and owned the rights of SMRPG characters in the first place?
I have no goddamn idea, like why own a part of Mario franchise if you can't even use it?
 

EricTheGamerman

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 21, 2014
Messages
3,197
I dont see how 2B is set up for smash at all. Please elaborate
Nier Automata was a huge success selling over 4 million copies (1.5 million more than Super Mario RPG sold for comparison's sake) and 2B has become a modern icon in many ways, propelling the Drakengard/Nier series in the same way that Persona 5 helped Persona break out into the mainstream. It was also similarly a Game of the Year 2017 nominee that got lots of praise and attention lavished on to it for being this huge realization of Yako Taro and Platinum Games' respective brands and visions. It's home series has also run for well over a decade (similar to Persona 5) and Sakurai also spoke very highly of Nier Automata and Nier/Drakengard in particular in an old Famitsu column (http://www.sourcegaming.info/2017/03/15/thinking-outside-the-box-sakurais-famitsu-column-vol-526/). Like it's kind of crazy how many similarities Nier Automata has to Persona 5, and the same forces that were propelled Joker into Smash can be seen behind 2B (Huge modern hit that redefines a genre, that Sakurai personally likes, and comes from an esteemed Japanese creator that isn't already in Smash). Not to mention, Square Enix has also already been fairly liberal with her having appearances in Soulcalibur VI and Phantasy Star Online 2.

She's just in a really good place to end up in Smash, and I think it's really naive to not consider her in the running too for a "Square Enix" rep. Like, she gets added for entirely different reasons than Geno and they don't really overlap at all, but there's enough behind her to make her a very sensible inclusion for Sakurai, Yako Taro, Nintendo, and Square Enix; especially if Nier Automata does get ported to Switch or Sakurai's meeting with Yako Taro actually went somewhere.

The "path to Smash" for Geno is never going to be clear. Certainly not when the likes of 2B and Lara Croft are still possibilities. He's in a good position, but this isn't some crazy grand slam with no resistance waiting to happen either.
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
I can understand the first point. However we can see so far that consistently, the characters that are largely talked about are all 3rd parties. What is the reason for this? The fact that consistently, every DLC fighter pass character has been 3rd party. It's true rumors can change, but this is something that's been incredibly consistent when it comes to rumored or leaked characters

Yes, Fire Emblem did well, however I don't think that means they are a lock to receive DLC. Chances are, the next wave of DLC was decided before Three Houses came out. Before the success of it started to show. Like I've stated, it would be extremely mistaken to think that more DLC planning was just recently. Given the rate these characters are coming out, It's far more likely they planned out further in advance before we knew about it. I think part of the reason Sakurai began talking about being worried about future DLC is because more of it was in talks when he made that statement. Speaking of his statements, yes he can change his mind. But that doesn't mean that everything he states will be flipped in the future. He's been pretty consistent with the video game character rule right? Unless he updates his statements, I think it's a fair to use them as potentially meaning something. Even you have quoted Sakurai yourself to defend your points, but then you also say we shouldn't rely on said statements

You are right. Smash 4 added a new Pokemon in the base game. Keyword, base game. Same for Ultimate. We have no precident that the newest Pokemon have to be added in as DLC. DLC is a different from base game. Developing content for a pre-existing game is handled differently than a base one. We have to wait and see on this, and maybe you are right. However I don't think we can claim just yet that it's a lock that we're getting a new Pokemon. Especially given the pattern of DLC so far and how there's no precident for it

It's a silly claim to me that Sakurai would use Nintendo as a cover. Yes, I'm sure Nintendo will be pleased with a worker of theirs going public and saying to blame the company rather than him. I really don't think Sakurai cares whether or not people get upset at him for not including certain characters. He's smart enough to know that he can't please everyone. Also, Joker was a big deal and was pretty positive. Hero was a big pick for Japan. Banjo Kazooie satisfied a bunch of people. There were some good picks here, why would Sakurai be concerned that people would annoy him about it? Especially since we got Banjo. Yes he's played a bunch of the games the characters came from, but guess what? Sakurai plays a bunch of games. He's stated that he owns a bunch of games. He loves Minecraft and Nier, I haven't seen them in Smash yet. I don't buy he was lying so Nintendo can take the blame instead. Were there details left out of that statement? Maybe. But I don't think it's a false statement

Yes we have a precident for Pokemon and FE characters. But we already got them in the Base Game. This is additional content. DLC. A whole different ball park. You yourself have stated the DLC is different from the base game picks. We're in a different scenario now. So we have to look at what has happened so far that matches closely with this scenario and so far, every DLC character has been 3rd party. I get the direction might change, but it's been working so well so far, that I don't think they'd change it so suddenly
Just because every DLC in the Fighters Pass is third party doesn't mean that future DLC won't include first party characters. We know that dicussions fpr DLC was talked about back in the beginning of 2018, but it's hard to imagine that they planned every DLC character out way before they were ready to reveal Smash Bros Ultimate. Most likely they made the initial idea of 5 DLC fighters and then in 2019 they decided to make more DLC fighters. We don't know the full details on what's happening behind close doors so there's a chance that you're right and they planned everything and decided to keep putting third party characters in (which honestly isn't a good sign for Geno because if everything was planned way in advance then those Spirits are great indicators that those characters are never getting in at this point), or maybe they wanted to test the Fighters Pass out before investing more into DLC. DLC is a different game for the base roster, but that doesn't mean they won't be putting in another Pokemon character. In Smash 4 we saw them put Corrin in, so why wouldn't they do the same for Ultimates. Plus we know that Greninja was chosen before X & Y were ready to be released, so obviously Sakurai would have knowledge of what Sword & Shield Pokemon were being made.

There's a great chance that for the next wave of DLC we're going to get a FE & Pokemon character. I might be wrong, but the timing of things makes it seem extremely likely.
 

Qeomash

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
322
Does anyone know why Square Enix wanted and owned the rights of SMRPG characters in the first place?
I have no goddamn idea, like why own a part of Mario franchise if you can't even use it?
It's kind of the other way around. They created the characters, so of course they own them. Nintendo licensed Mario (and others) to Square to make the game. The rest came from Square, so they owned them.

Sure, they can't use the characters now, but not using them doesn't cost a thing.
 
Last edited:

EricTheGamerman

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 21, 2014
Messages
3,197
I have no goddamn idea, like why own a part of Mario franchise if you can't even use it?
It's just standard copyright stuff to be honest. It's not really all that intentional and I'm sure neither party really cared about where the original characters for the game really went at the end of the day. They were Square's creations, so they were just theirs. And I'm sure Nintendo never really thought that much about Square ditching them in the first place, let alone that these characters specifically would ever really be worth anything. And to be honest, they aren't outside of Geno and Mallow, so I'm sure Nintendo has minimal interest in ending up with the overall rights to Super Mario RPG of all things when they own tons of other characters for even just specifically Mario RPGs.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
It's kind of the other way around. They created the characters, so of course they own them. Nintendo licensed Mario (and others) to Square to make the game. The rest came from Square, so they owned them.

Sure, they can't use the characters now, but not using them doesn't cost a thing.
Was that part of some agreement that whatever Square creates, they own it? And how come Nomura created Sora but yet Disney owns him?
 

Qeomash

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
322
Was that part of some agreement that whatever Square creates, they own it? And how come Nomura created Sora but yet Disney owns him?
Likely part of the agreement, yes. Very standard. It also probably stated that Square can't use them without Nintendo's approval, too. Clauses like that are there so that if Nintendo wants to use the characters, they have to work together with Square. Not just forget that Square was involved. Not as a negative, more like "these are both of ours, let's work together".
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member

Guest
Likely part of the agreement, yes. Very standard. It also probably stated that Square can't use them without Nintendo's approval, too. Clauses like that are there so that if Nintendo wants to use the characters, they have to work together with Square. Not just forget that Square was involved. Not as a negative, more like "these are both of ours, let's work together".
So it’s more of a co-ownership situation? Would Nintendo sue Square for using the characters for something else without their permission?
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Off-topic: Caught up with a the Pokemon Sword and Shield leaks really like all of them and love the Sobble line. Probably going to end up as one of my favourite Pokemon the final evolved form. That's all say about that.

On-topic: Still believe and trust in Geno's chances!
 

Qeomash

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
322
So it’s more of a co-ownership situation? Would Nintendo sue Square for using the characters for something else without their permission?
Yes, and vice versa. It sounds bad, but a lawsuit like that usually isn't. "Hey, Nintendo, you forgot we own Geno and you used him in a cameo for a game without credit, can you give us some money?" "Oops, yeah sure."
 

Grumbo

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
673
Nier Automata was a huge success selling over 4 million copies (1.5 million more than Super Mario RPG sold for comparison's sake) and 2B has become a modern icon in many ways, propelling the Drakengard/Nier series in the same way that Persona 5 helped Persona break out into the mainstream. It was also similarly a Game of the Year 2017 nominee that got lots of praise and attention lavished on to it for being this huge realization of Yako Taro and Platinum Games' respective brands and visions. It's home series has also run for well over a decade (similar to Persona 5) and Sakurai also spoke very highly of Nier Automata and Nier/Drakengard in particular in an old Famitsu column (http://www.sourcegaming.info/2017/03/15/thinking-outside-the-box-sakurais-famitsu-column-vol-526/). Like it's kind of crazy how many similarities Nier Automata has to Persona 5, and the same forces that were propelled Joker into Smash can be seen behind 2B (Huge modern hit that redefines a genre, that Sakurai personally likes, and comes from an esteemed Japanese creator that isn't already in Smash). Not to mention, Square Enix has also already been fairly liberal with her having appearances in Soulcalibur VI and Phantasy Star Online 2.

She's just in a really good place to end up in Smash, and I think it's really naive to not consider her in the running too for a "Square Enix" rep. Like, she gets added for entirely different reasons than Geno and they don't really overlap at all, but there's enough behind her to make her a very sensible inclusion for Sakurai, Yako Taro, Nintendo, and Square Enix; especially if Nier Automata does get ported to Switch or Sakurai's meeting with Yako Taro actually went somewhere.

The "path to Smash" for Geno is never going to be clear. Certainly not when the likes of 2B and Lara Croft are still possibilities. He's in a good position, but this isn't some crazy grand slam with no resistance waiting to happen either.
2B doesnt have decades of fan support behind them. Characters that have crossed over in a fighting game rarely join another in the following years. All I can think of is Terry and he’s the king of crossovers. And both Platinum and Square have characters theyd likely put before 2B. Akira Howard, Lara Croft, Sora (disney permitting), and possibly Crono. (and if Geno if they have a heart). I dont think 2B is impossible, but I wouldnt say she’s too likely to get in. With Geno we actually have a lot of backing from insiders and a solid leak for once
 

Zema

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
456
Location
I fight for my friends.
I have no goddamn idea, like why own a part of Mario franchise if you can't even use it?
It makes sense. If SMRPG was particularly successful and its characters were particularly well liked, then Nintendo would have to purchase the rights for them from Square.

This is one of the big reasons (in my opinion) that Geno's popularity is a bit of a problem for Nintendo. His inclusion in Smash would undeniably make him more popular, and Square Enix then has the leverage to ask for more money to let Nintendo use him in the future.
 
Last edited:

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
2B doesnt have decades of fan support behind them. Characters that have crossed over in a fighting game rarely join another in the following years. All I can think of is Terry and he’s the king of crossovers. And both Platinum and Square have characters theyd likely put before 2B. Akira Howard, Lara Croft, Sora (disney permitting), and possibly Crono. (and if Geno if they have a heart). I dont think 2B is impossible, but I wouldnt say she’s too likely to get in. With Geno we actually have a lot of backing from insiders and a solid leak for once
But Joker & Terry did?

Square Enix & PlatinumGames would most likely want 2B in due to how successful NieR Automata was. Also don't think they won't include 2B just because she's in Soul Calibur.
 

maf91186

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
286
I dont think 2B is impossible, but I wouldnt say she’s too likely to get in. With Geno we actually have a lot of backing from insiders and a solid leak for once
Of course she's likely. TnA in an amazing game = appearances everywhere. Haven't you ever been on the Internet before? :ultpacman:

I'm laughing but there's also a small, sad sliver of truth here....
 

Grumbo

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
673
But Joker & Terry did?

Square Enix & PlatinumGames would most likely want 2B in due to how successful NieR Automata was. Also don't think they won't include 2B just because she's in Soul Calibur.
Persona has been around for awhile, SMT even longer. SNK and Terry were fighting game staples and are still around. Pure fan demand isnt everything, but it does matter with many of the choices from Ultimate. We already got two generally popular square enix characters. Its about time for a fan demanded one.
 

SpiritOfRuin

Smash Ace
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
737
Yeah but see that's where the idea of a reboot keeps getting thrown around. It would provide the opportunity to totally overall everything that had previously been clung to only for it's legacy:ultganondorf:. I doubt the roster would be smaller than 4 even after condensing all the redundancies. Not to mention there is still plenty of design space for modes in and out of battle. brawl might be hot garbage but damn if it didn't have the best package of content to play through out of the whole bunch. This might even free them to do a proper story mode with all the design issues of subspace worked out.
Yep 100% agree with this. Imagine seeing more iconic characters in an expressive story mode like SSE honestly I would take cuts for that. Also yeah a lot could be condensed into alt costumes or more characters like Pokemon Trainer.
 

EricTheGamerman

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 21, 2014
Messages
3,197
2B doesnt have decades of fan support behind them. Characters that have crossed over in a fighting game rarely join another in the following years. All I can think of is Terry and he’s the king of crossovers. And both Platinum and Square have characters theyd likely put before 2B. Akira Howard, Lara Croft, Sora (disney permitting), and possibly Crono. (and if Geno if they have a heart). I dont think 2B is impossible, but I wouldnt say she’s too likely to get in. With Geno we actually have a lot of backing from insiders and a solid leak for once
No, 2B doesn't have a decade of fan support behind her, but she's got recency bias and a wider appeal than Geno (even though this thread likes to pretend otherwise when she gets brought up, but they did the same for Dragon Quest, so yeah...). Also, characters that appear in other crossover fighting games that don't appear in others is just kind of dumb to bring up given that these aren't really active decisions that decide which characters appear where and more specifically that Bandai Namco develops Soulcalibur and also develop Smash, so I don't think it'd even be an issue worth bringing up.

2B is hot and popular right now, so that's one reason to look to capitalize off of her. But beyond that, Drakengard/Nier is a longer running series that is beloved by a number of people and recently broke big, so that's another reason to include her. Similarly, Yako Taro is another auteur Japanese developer that speaks to the very idea of Sakurai's "representations of Japanese gaming" and one he specifically respects a great deal. Nier will continue, so Square Enix is certainly interested in seeing the brand continue, so I don't see any real argument against her. She's actually pretty damn likely when you look at it. Yeah, there are other choices, but Square Enix, Nintendo, Sakurai, and Yako Taro all gain from her inclusion. Sora's not even Square Enix's to license out, so that's really not worth bringing up. Lara Croft is an acquisition and not an originally Japanese character, which may hurt her given Sakurai's general focus on Japanese gaming in Smash. Crono is just a crazy hail mary of an idea because Chrono as a series is largely going to remain dead due to various issues and I don't think there's much to compel them to "want Crono over 2B." And Akira Howard? Astral Chain didn't immediately light up the charts based upon sales data, and we'll see what they want to do with them. They certainly don't seem to have made the same impact that 2B and Nier Automata did though.

And, no, we don't have anything from insiders. Fatman has proven to me he's not really worth listening to, Sabi burned all of her good will in the past few weeks (particularly with the whole transphobic mess and accusing another "leaker" of trolling or whatever), Vergeben doesn't seem to know anything at all (and hasn't really offered anything new since Dragon Quest), and an unidentified leak that nobody really knows the proper source of came out with a Mii costume list. There's no solid leak about **** and we're all just as in the dark. The insiders aren't actually backing much of anything right now to be honest, they're mostly just taking seemingly random shots in the dark and not vocalizing any "leaks."
 
Last edited:

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
Persona has been around for awhile, SMT even longer. SNK and Terry were fighting game staples and are still around. Pure fan demand isnt everything, but it does matter with many of the choices from Ultimate. We already got two generally popular square enix characters. Its about time for a fan demanded one.
I agree with the fan demand, but that isn't going to happen anytime soon now. Plus the NieR series has been around for a while as well being a spinoff of the Drakengard series which has a thing since 2003.
 

Rohanx17

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
1,088
Yep 100% agree with this. Imagine seeing more iconic characters in an expressive story mode like SSE honestly I would take cuts for that. Also yeah a lot could be condensed into alt costumes or more characters like Pokemon Trainer.
Truth be told I've been tooling around with the idea of what something like this could look like in my head for a while now. Obviously I don't have time or resources to make it happen but its fun to think about. Maybe once I'm done with it I'll post it here in the next time where hit with a nasty dry spell
 
Last edited:

Grumbo

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
673
All im gonna say is that one day you doubters are gonna have to eat your hats
 

RingJ5

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
617
I've seen this all over the net and this thread so this isn't explicitly aimed at anyone in particular, the fanboy in me needs to let it out before I pop.

Joker does not represent smt. At all. Persona and smt have nothing to do with each other that isn't shared by literally any other atlus rpg to some degree. Even then he really only represents modern persona with all of his content focused predominately on p5(himself,series icon,stage,spirit board, majority of music and spirits) with some smaller references to 3 and 4 in the music and spirits. Which seems in line with how they want to pretend the earlier personas dont exist but i digress.

..... uh geno! Put him in smash!
Etrian Odyssey would like to have a word with you. The reason Persona games are considered SMT spinoffs is mainly because they share the same pool of demons as all SMT games, but these aspects are not actually shared across all Atlus games. Besides maybe a mascot cameo here and there, SMT/Persona demons are missing from Atlus’ non-SMT series, like the aforementioned Etrian, the Vanillaware titles, Trauma Center, Catherine, Dept. Heaven, Radiant Historia, and others.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member

Guest
No, 2B doesn't have a decade of fan support behind her, but she's got recency bias and a wider appeal than Geno (even though this thread likes to pretend otherwise when she gets brought up, but they did the same for Dragon Quest, so yeah...). Also, characters that appear in other crossover fighting games that don't appear in others is just kind of dumb to bring up given that these aren't really active decisions that decide which characters appear where and more specifically that Bandai Namco develops Soulcalibur and also develop Smash, so I don't think it'd even be an issue worth bringing up.

2B is hot and popular right now, so that's one reason to look to capitalize off of her. But beyond that, Drakengard/Nier is a longer running series that is beloved by a number of people and recently broke big, so that's another reason to include her. Similarly, Yako Taro is another auteur Japanese developer that speaks to the very idea of Sakurai's "representations of Japanese gaming" and one he specifically respects a great deal. Nier will continue, so Square Enix is certainly interested in seeing the brand continue, so I don't see any real argument against her. She's actually pretty damn likely when you look at it. Yeah, there are other choices, but Square Enix, Nintendo, Sakurai, and Yako Taro all gain from her inclusion. Sora's not even Square Enix's to license out, so that's really not worth bringing up. Lara Croft is an acquisition and not an originally Japanese character, which may hurt her given Sakurai's general focus on Japanese gaming in Smash. Crono is just a crazy hail mary of an idea because Chrono as a series is largely going to remain dead due to various issues and I don't think there's much to compel them to "want Crono over 2B." And Akira Howard? Astral Chain didn't immediately light up the charts based upon sales data, and we'll see what they want to do with them. They certainly don't seem to have made the same impact that 2B and Nier Automata did though.

And, no, we don't have anything from insiders. Fatman has proven to me he's not really worth listening to, Sabi burned all of her good will in the past few weeks (particularly with the whole transphobic mess and accusing another "leaker" of trolling or whatever), Vergeben doesn't seem to know anything at all (and hasn't really offered anything new since Dragon Quest), and an unidentified leak that nobody really knows the proper source of came out with a Mii costume list. There's no solid leak about **** and we're all just as in the dark. The insiders aren't actually backing much of anything right now to be honest, they're mostly just taking seemingly random shots in the dark and not vocalizing any "leaks."
I think Vergeben and Sabi both said Terry was coming though. Both said Ryu is not the 5th fighter. What exactly did Fatman do that makes him untrustworthy? What I remember was Sabi confronting memoryman because of his trolling at the discord. I don’t recall anything about some “leaker”.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

QQS

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
1,171
I’m still and always will be pretty confident about Geno’s inclusion in Ultimate as a playable character. Nothing gonna make me change that. I have said this since day 1 and I have believed in this since I first played Mario RPG in 1996.

All is in his favour. All adds up. Geno is there, being revealed sooner than later. I just hope to see his reveal trailer in November or December, to get him playable in the first months of 2020.

Geno is closer than you think. I will laugh about all the things that Geno haters have said on many social media, like they did with Banjo, Cloud, Ridley, KKR or others saying that “they are never getting in”. His reveal will be the most beautiful thing ever on the internet.

Geno will be the last cherry of the cake for us.

AB6FBE90-B124-4AA6-A3CC-6CE02FD87930.jpeg


Photo credits to Nakamanga.
 

Glitch-EGamer

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 16, 2019
Messages
1,104
I think Vergeben and Sabi both said Terry was coming though. Both said Ryu is not the 5th fighter. What exactly did Fatman do that makes him untrustworthy? What I remember was Sabi confronting memoryman because of his trolling at the discord. I don’t recall anything about some “leaker”.
Besides, Fatman was giving speculation based off things he's heard. He has done nothing to wrong us and his statements hold water considering the place he's in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom