I'm not even sure what the hell we're arguing about. I just made an observation that a number of people I have met write off Final Fantasy as a "generic" JRPG, which is something I disagree with.
Also, a few things I feel compelled to argue with to kill time before my next class.
These don't count as Final Fantasy games,
right?
Super Mario Legend of the Seven Stars
Wild Arms
Breath of Fire
Saga Frontier
Romancing Saga
Earthbound
Shining Force
Skies of Arcadia
Dragon Quest
Xenosaga
These are generic jRPG games. The Final Fantasy series is generic.
I can't really speak for Wild Arms, or any of the Saga games, since I haven't played Wild Arms and I have limited experience with the Saga series, but most of those you listed are far from generic. Earthbound and Mario RPG are about as unique as JRPGs get. Shining Force is a TBS game. The only ones I'll give you as being generic in there is maybe Xenosaga, Skies of Arcadia and Breathe of Fire.
Since Dragon Quest practically invented the genre I think it pretty much has to right to do whatever the hell it wants, and I'm not even a fan of the series.
Using finalark's distinction, RPGs in general don't have great customization to say an RTS like FF Tactics which would have more of a "customized" feel since you are using more units to fight a larger group of enemies. RTSs also fail in ways to MMOs in terms of individual character creation. However, with internet connectivity it is possible to have a very large possibility for RTS games like Disgaea to create custom maps and user related content. Especially if there is great cross-compatibility between the game and computer, it is possible to extensively hack the game and allow possibly more content than originally intended. But RPGs aren't very customizable at all in the sense that we would like it to potentially have in an overall sense.
I think you mean TBS, or turn based strategy. These are games like Fire Emblem or Shining Force. And RTS means real time strategy, like Warcraft or Age of Empires.
By the way, your whole argument about strategy games having not as much customization as MMOs (I'm not even sure how that's relevant to the current discussion) is pretty much shot down by the entire X-Com series.
I'm just going to throw this out there, but I know RPGs exist outside of JRPGs. I'm an avid fan of table top RPGs and western RPGs. But let's be honest, JRPGs are rather different from their western counterparts. This is why we separate them into different genres.
Seriously, man, clean up your paragraphs. I have no idea what you're trying to say half the time.