finalark
SNORLAX
I actually sold my PS2 a while back. I need to buy some HD collections. I miss Jak and Sly.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That is true. Practice makes perfect, so he can really give Tidus a better performance vocal-wise.I have to agree with you here. Auron and Jecht did a petty solid job. Everyone else... could use some work. Thankfully James Arnold Taylor has been in a million other games since X and has had some practice. He's not bad in Dissidia.
Honestly, I've never played XII, and didn't have a PS2 during the time it was released, so I can definitely benefit from a re-release via the PSN.Seeing how its the PlayStation FFs that put the franchise on the map of the western gaming world I'm surprised they aren't really chomping at the bit to remake them. Hopefully they'll eventually re-release XII. With the alternative leveling system that isn't the god-awful licence board.
Oh, you're right, it said nothing about it being HD. They did say it will have an achievement system, cloud saves, and the ability to increase character stats for a fee, but that's about it.Do we know if its HD yet? I think its just a port of the old PC version of FFVII. Meaning that if you want to play it prepare to go through a million back doors to get it running.
It wouldn't render your guide entirely useless. It just means you can't really use it for the Dark Aeon or Penance battles, unless the International Version (assuming that is what the HD re-release will reflect) is really that much different than the version we're used to.Nah, I probably won't. I already have FFX on the PS2, and with my PS2 literally next to my PS3, I can just play it whenever. Of course, I might get a re-release for PS3 if it has a bunch of bonus and re-done stuff. The downside to that would be it would make my Prima Strategy Guide for the game kind of useless.
Honestly, I've never played XII, and didn't have a PS2 during the time it was released, so I can definitely benefit from a re-release via the PSN.
Weapon and Armor licenses though were awful. That was a pretty bad decision.
Dat Penelo. That is all.
Indeed. I like Yoshida's designs more than Nomura's zipper fetish.The art looks nice though. I would like to see Yoshida as the character designer for the next FF game instead of Nomura.
Honestly, outside of Vaan and Penelo being the result of an executive meddling I really didn't have any issues with the game's story.And apart from the story/character problems in XII, I really liked the game.
Did you forget? $Makes you wonder why they don't just bundle X and XII together as an HD collection. I'm sure there's enough space for both of them on a blue-ray disk.
I never sell my old systems, I just like the ability to play my old games whenever I want although I never do.
Haha, I actually don't keep all of my stuff hooked up. Older systems are put away just to make things cleaner.Oh same. My bedroom currently houses a small 12 inch or so TV, and a SNES, N64, Dreamcast, PS1, and VHS/DVD combo player. And a giant mass of chords.
Sounds like my room.
I am currently trying to get all the old achievements in XIV before 2.0, as well as everyything 50. I have to say I think this game has the potential, and quite a good community.New Final Fantasy XIV trailer.
This time it actually feels like a trailer rather than a TV ad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYMrFXcqvk4&feature=player_embedded
XI was fun when I played it long ago. However, these days the damn thing is a dinosaur that aged like milk in the back of the pantry. That game needs to be laid to rest.I don't think Square gets the point of MMO's. You release 1 good one and milk it, not continuously release bad ones
It's my understanding that XI is actually a solid MMO. I wouldn't know, since I've never played it, but if they're still releasing expansions and the servers are still going to this day, then that must say something about the game. As long as they really do fix XIV as they claim they have, then that game shouldn't be bad either. Although, I do agree that they should've just left XI as the only MMO and focus on more single-player Final Fantasy titles. If they want to add multiplayer, they shouldn't do so on an MMO scale, in my opinion.I don't think Square gets the point of MMO's. You release 1 good one and milk it, not continuously release bad ones
XI is a game that was solid back when it first came out in 2003. Its a game from an era in MMO game design in which it was believed that the correct way to make MMOs was to make them as grindy and difficult as possible. XI is from a time in which the words "casual" and "MMO" were never used in the same sentence. And frankly, if you ever give XI a go, it really shows.It's my understanding that XI is actually a solid MMO. I wouldn't know, since I've never played it, but if they're still releasing expansions and the servers are still going to this day, then that must say something about the game.
Ahhh, so it requires tons of grinding to get anywhere. It appears the game has aged, but by the sounds of it, it seems to be a solid game to this day, despite having the old MMO feel in terms of grinding. I may never get to play XI, but I do hope to get into XIV when it's released for the PS3. Frankly speaking, I only want to play through the main story, just so I could say I beat the game (not counting any expansions). I'm currently playing FFV; the only FF title between I-X that I have yet to beat, so once I finish that, I can say I've played and beaten Final Fantasy I-X. I still need to play XII, and I have played and beaten XIII and XIII-2, the former of which I did enjoy despite the change in formula (being linear and all).XI is a game that was solid back when it first came out in 2003. Its a game from an era in MMO game design in which it was believed that the correct way to make MMOs was to make them as grindy and difficult as possible. XI is from a time in which the words "casual" and "MMO" were never used in the same sentence. And frankly, if you ever give XI a go, it really shows.
That being said, it's actually a really fun and really addicting game once you pierce that six foot thick concrete wall it called an entry barrier. I mean, this game really wants you to figure everything out yourself. If it wasn't for the fact that a veteran player was kind enough to give me a few pointers, I would have never have figured out how to do anything in that game.
And while I'm taking about XI I'm just going to say that it has hands-down the best community I've ever seen in an MMORPG.
Damn it, every time I talk about XI it makes me want to restart my account so I can keep working on my Black Mage level.
Ahhh, so it requires tons of grinding to get anywhere. It appears the game has aged, but by the sounds of it, it seems to be a solid game to this day, despite having the old MMO feel in terms of grinding. I may never get to play XI, but I do hope to get into XIV when it's released for the PS3.
XII is another FF that's actually pretty different from most others. First game (offline) FF with real time combat, much less linear with tons of things that you can do in between advancing the main quest, a very western-RPG influenced story, but its still one of my favorites. Maybe its because it goes out of its way to try something new.I still need to play XII, and I have played and beaten XIII and XIII-2, the former of which I did enjoy despite the change in formula (being linear and all).
The thing with XII is that even though it's very different, it works out to create a really deep game. XIII may have borrowed notes from X in terms of story progression (to a certain extent), but the thing XIII lacks compared to X are various side quests (the C'ieth Stone missions are just too repetitive and shallow to be of any significance), and NPC the player can interact with. Honestly, my biggest gripe is that after completing the main story, there really isn't much incentive to playing anymore. Yes, there are some superbosses to be had, but they're actually way too easy to defeat with the right set-up, and the set-ups needed (accessories, weapons, etc.) to beat said bosses are also easy to acquire. Final Fantasy X had many superbosses in the arena with varying difficulty, and even though Nemesis was a joke, Penance and the Dark Aeons helped to rectify that in the International Version of X.And honestly, I don't know why everyone says that XIII is so different. I've said it a million times before, it takes a lot from X. XII should be considered the "black sheep" game.
Indeed. XIII is certainly among the weaker titles of the series. Although I still believe that its not as different as people tend to make it out to be.
Again, I enjoyed XIII for what it is, and the battle system is fantastic, but it's some of the limiting things in the game that hurts it, including a lack of exploration and side quests, and limiting characters' stat growth; you can't max out their Crystarium until AFTER beating the game.
Well, the game progression is still very different, as well as level progression. There are other things, like lack of towns and NPCs that make it different from other Final Fantasies. Still, as stated before, even though it's one of the weaker titles in the series, I still enjoy playing it every once in a while. Getting all the achievements were a pain though, mostly because of "Treasure Hunter", but that's just a nitpick.Indeed. XIII is certainly among the weaker titles of the series. Although I still believe that its not as different as people tend to make it out to be.
That's because V took III's job system and perfected the hell out of it. Yeah, X-2 did a nice job as well, but V's job system was just so deep, and the level of customization was insane. Mind you, I have yet to beat the game; I'm going by what I've experienced so far. My personal favorite gameplay in a Final Fantasy though has to go to IX.While we're talking about game play, I'd like to point out that in my honest opinion V is the best out of all the SNES Final Fantasies in that category.
Exactly. The I really don't feel that IV or VI offer quite the same level of depth in their game play. They're good games, don't get me wrong, but for different reasons.That's because V took III's job system and perfected the hell out of it. Yeah, X-2 did a nice job as well, but V's job system was just so deep, and the level of customization was insane.
IX is my favorite Final Fantasy, hands down.Mind you, I have yet to beat the game; I'm going by what I've experienced so far. My personal favorite gameplay in a Final Fantasy though has to go to IX.[/COLOR]
That makes the both of us. VI, VIII, and IX are my favorite Final Fantasy games. Also, IX has my favorite Final Fantasy character in the entire series; Adelbert Steiner.IX is my favorite Final Fantasy, hands down.
I really want a remake of it.
FFI is a very simple game, and being the first game in the series on the NES, it definitely shows. It is that simple gameplay that gives it a charm that RPGs today could never get away with. FFII's system was actually really cool. Of course, there was exploiting the hell out of the multiple command glitch, allowing the player to develop their party much faster than intended. While the glitch was fixed in later releases, it was still majorly easy to max your characters to ******** levels at the start of the game if you know how to go about do so, and it was so fun.I'm actually a fan of the classic FFI and the weird FFII with is funny skill level stuff, lol.
The only thing that's missing is "make Chrono Break" with no darts anywhere near it.LOL Finalark, saving pic.
If you've never played a Final Fantasy and you want something you can pick up and play the NES era Final Fantasies are not good choices. III in particular isn't a very good choice because the only place you can save is on the over world meaning you'll end up spending hours in dungeons and you'll have to do them in one go.I am considering buying Final Fantasy III to my Samsung Galaxy SII (Android). It has a hefty price tag, so I was wondering if a RPG noob like me should go for it?
I need a game that I can pick up and play for a couple of minutes sometimes.
Honestly I'd just find a Final Fantasy that appeals to you and give it a whirl. If III is your choice just be warned of the above. And be warned that its game play does feel pretty dated.This will be my first Final Fantasy game. I haven't played so many RPGs, just all of the Pokémon games, Mario RPG and Mario and Luigi...