momochuu
Smash Legend
- Joined
- May 8, 2008
- Messages
- 12,868
- NNID
- Momochuu
- 3DS FC
- 2380-3247-9039
BoxxyBaybeeOphelia who is that in your sig?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
BoxxyBaybeeOphelia who is that in your sig?
Even if it's only 50.01%?I say that if the pro-ban is over 50% but under 66%, then all SWF tournament should tem-ban Metaknight for one month and see what people think afterwards.
Sorry, I don't want to play a game where I'm being put down by the community for physical handicaps.That being said, everyone going to Melee would be easier. No one argue in our game. But I realize that thats not the best option for some.
Hmm...I guess I just didn't think they did a good job.Well, of course the group that doesn't want to change something clearly doesn't have to proof anything?
They actually have only to disprove the arguments of the group that wants to change something.
Ninja'd by bobson. :V
Mythological, especially Falco. Sethlon almost threestocked my MK, then I won with Snake. HMMMMM.Inui, Dedede, Wario, MK, and Falco all have an advantage on Snake IMO (55-45 their favor).
^ This is true.lol, Falco doesn't have an advantage over snake. it's either even or snake's advantage.
MK's metagame progressed at the speed of light. Snake lagged behind. Snake's catching up.I've got a better question:
If snake beats MK, why is it that SNAKE was the #1 in Ankoku's chart and was toppled by METAKNIGHT?
O_o
Something doesn't add up. If Snake beat MK, more MKs would mean MORE Snake dominance... not knocking him off the #1 spot.
qftBan Snake instead, he's better.
Maybe for one tournament per area if its that low?Even if it's only 50.01%?
Sorry, I don't want to play a game where I'm being put down by the community for physical handicaps.
Additionally, I prefer Brawl in general (because that handicap matters not as much).
Thank you very much.
There is no definitive ratio for mk vs snake. I personally believe it to be in snakes advantage.So what you're saying is that not only does Meta Knight have a theoretical advantage on Snake, but that he also executes this game plan with much greater ease? Because it's 55:45 MK based on theory craft too, it gets worse when you start bringing the human element in.
No... I mean... REAL handicaps. Like... you know... hereditary defects and such.I understand the physical handicaps for Melee. High-levels of play require you to pretty much just practice on your own for hours on end. That's why I stuck with Peach.
This is the exact same thing i saidMK's metagame progressed at the speed of light. Snake lagged behind. Snake's catching up.
Purple name = bigger audience.This is the exact same thing i said.
Aww... D:No... I mean... REAL handicaps. Like... you know... hereditary defects and such.
I tried playing Peach, but I still got put down by the Melee players in my area, so I gave up trying to play with them, and instead play the game I enjoy more.
Ah, yeah with herditary defects, I hear you.No... I mean... REAL handicaps. Like... you know... hereditary defects and such.
I tried playing Peach, but I still got put down by the Melee players in my area, so I gave up trying to play with them, and instead play the game I enjoy more.
I'd hardly say this game will evolve. Its just way too shallow. if this where Melee 2.0, it would be evolving like it was the first three months, but it isn't, it's Brawl.the arguement that the game is still evolving is starting to seem more and more valid, IMO
Your right about that, but, Snake is a very deep character, he can do stuff that other characters can't do. Thats why i think in the future almost nothing will change besides snake.I'd hardly say this game will evolve. Its just way too shallow. if this where Melee 2.0, it would be evolving like it was the first three months, but it isn't, it's Brawl.
wow way to vote before reading and being sureI voted no, but now I'm unsure. The arguments supporting the ban are pretty **** convincing.
Hell no.Greatly benefit (definate tier list benefit):
Toon Link, Pit, Ice Climbers, ROB, King Dedede, Olimar, Falco, Pikachu, Marth
As Brawl progresses, more regions report Metaknight problems. Regions like Puerto Rico have quelled it with a soft ban on Metaknight counterpicks ("soft bans" are social stigmas against picking a character. In the case of Puerto Rico, people who switch to Metaknight during their counterpick find their names recorded and announced after the tournament, discouraging them from doing so), and many other regions similarly look down upon Metaknight mains. Other regions, such as SoCal, NorCal, Washington, Arizona, or Eastern Canada find their players and tournaments gradually becoming more MK-centric, and support the ban (several of these regions running MK-banned tournament series).
I marked the characters I don't know as well (Pit, Toon Link and Olimar) as Cyan, and the characters you're pretty wrong on with Red. :3From how I see it:
Greatly benefit (definate tier list benefit):
Toon Link, Pit, Ice Climbers, ROB, King Dedede, Olimar, Falco, Pikachu, Marth
Slightly benefit (probable tier list benefit):
Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser, Wario, Link, Zelda, Sheik, Ganondorf, Samus, Kirby, Fox, Wolf, Captain Falcon, Pokemon Trainer, Lucario, Ike, Ness, Lucas, Mr. Game and Watch, Sonic
Nah, I disagree. Marth is a harder matchup, Pika is harder, ICs are freaking lol, Olimar is harder, and you have all of them benefiting from MK's ban. That means more of them, which is actually bad for Ganon.Slightly benefit (probable tier list benefit):
Ganondorf
As a Falco main since the game's release, so would I...I'd rathers face an MK as Falco then a Snake.
Yah. I'm weird like that.
Way to think MK deserves to be banned. >.>wow way to vote before reading and being sure
<_<
Same reason why Snake would be going down, and not be the best IMO.Bowser does not benefit from MK leaving, at all. Less MKs means more Falcos, Olimars and D3's.
You Marked Mario wrong? oooook.I marked the characters I don't know as well (Pit, Toon Link and Olimar) as Cyan, and the characters you're pretty wrong on with Red. :3
i think olimar would benifit a small amount, he cant go to much higherHmm... Well, I've thought about it for a day and I've decided to go with the pro-ban side. Granted, I think it goes against competitive standards but, as I've said in the past, I think the community would benefit much more with him gone and, overall, I believe that the pro-ban side has a much more convincing arguement. From how I see it:
Greatly benefit (definate tier list benefit):
Toon Link, Pit, Ice Climbers, ROB, King Dedede, Olimar, Falco, Pikachu, Marth
Hmm... point taken. I'll change that then. For Falco, I was more focused on how he did against Snake and King Dedede, to be completely honest.Hell no.
MK vs Falco is even which is greatly to Falco's advantage, as it massively boosts his viability.
MK also keeps Marth and ROB at bay, the former being a definite disadvantageous matchup for Falco, with ROB being a slight disadvantage imo.
With Marth and ROB being given a breath of life, Falco's viability would actually drop. =/
Yes. Considering that he still has a lot of hard matchups with Top and High Tier, his position will not change by much.You Marked Mario wrong? oooook.
I'd rathers face an MK as Falco then a Snake.
Yah. I'm weird like that.