Let's digest this entire post so that I can alleviate you of any illusions or misinterpretations of my behaviors that you have.
"Claiming someone three stocked you in not one but two matches and then calling them a liar when they do tell the truth is being a sore loser... -_-;"
-I'm sorry, I didn't know you played these matches with us. Please refresh my memory as to who you were, Olimar or Snake? I told you he three stocked me both rounds and you have what proof that he did not? His word means absolutely nothing. He is trying to make me feel better and give me a softer landing back to the boards. If anything, this would only prove me to be a poor, if not strange, liar.
"You do apparently because you threw a fit too when you lost to Gigyas Knight in Electric Schuffle."
I through a fit? I said "This was such a waste of time," which it was because I lost and no longer had a shot at the prize. I play to win. That does not mean that I play thinking or believing that I will actually do so.
"Because you talk as if you're the worst player in the world when you have even three stocked Zeonstar in the past, something I haven't done yet myself even using strong counterpick stages and characters."
I don't talk like I'm the worst player in the world. However, I am just about the only player who can call himself "suck" without being postoptomistic and emotional about it. I said I suck because that's how I'm playing. If I were playing better, then I'd definately say so. ZenoStar three stocked me three times in all thirty something matches we've had during and after that tournament. He did this using Ganondorf which is a ****ing 80:20 match-up in my favor. If I had any sort of idea what I was doing, he shouldn't even be able to approach. That means I sucked. Even someone who doesn't main Olimar should be able to demolish Ganondorf in that match-up, reguardless of who the Ganondorf is.
If I was being such a poor sport, why did I improve my knowledge of Ganondorf to continue on and three stock ZenoStar twice and prevent him from winning on any stage other than Battlefield (in which case all matches were close and went in either direction).
"If you didn't make it seem like you're a complete failure of human being everytime you lost a set then I'd believe this."
What you believe is no longer an issue, the only things that matter are facts. And these are the facts.
"Being a perfectionist is more discouraging then motivating because, once you get to a certain point, nothing is ever good enough anymore."
For who? Are you telling me what I think, believe, or feel, again? I'll keep pushing toward perfection until there is nothing left, but perfection. In which case I'll keep pressing toward it, even in vain and naive attempts. That will never mean that nothing is ever good enough, because perfection is good enough.