Not a clue. His posts are fairly sizable and I have skimmed them to this point. All I know is he beat me to saying "me."
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Thing is, he may or may not know due to Dancer, Mediator, or any other roles that aren't public knowledge. It's not on the man being voted, it's on the voters. Players can claim when they feel they need to claim or when I tell them to.Anyway, on further examination, I have to admit that Ryker's correct. I'd forgotten about the other vote-manipulating roles, and although one vote isn't a huge deal, it'd be impractical to say "You can't go any further than L-4 just to be safe". I think in this case it's the responsibility of the player being targeted to let people know he's a vote away from being lynched and claim accordingly.
Read his posts. I seem to remember a problem that was caused in a certain Megaman themed game where a player had a problem with presentational play. Be careful reading into that if you're serious.Ryker, Gheb, what do you think of Xonar?
Its already been stated, but it's on whoever threw the vote down to deal with the consequences.That reminds me, NO TAKING WAGONS TO L-1 in RVS. Because there's a good chance the wagon target might have the "takes one less vote to lynch" restriction, and that would be bad for (hopefully) obvious reasons.
Agreed.Thing is, he may or may not know due to Dancer, Mediator, or any other roles that aren't public knowledge. It's not on the man being voted, it's on the voters. Players can claim when they feel they need to claim or when I tell them to.
If by that you mean that I trust a vote on Rajam is never a bad thing regardless of alignment, then yes, I can trust him with my vote any time.IAgreed.
Ryker, is there anyone here who you would trust with your vote based purely on the person?
Because i wanted to be active in some manner and that is the first thing that comes to mind. RVS doesn't interest me but at the same time i dont want that to be a reason for inactivity.If by that you mean that I trust a vote on Rajam is never a bad thing regardless of alignment, then yes, I can trust him with my vote any time.
If by that you mean letting someone else choose where my vote goes, never. Why do you ask?
vote: NickelbackR0cksBecause i wanted to be active in some manner and that is the first thing that comes to mind. RVS doesn't interest me but at the same time i dont want that to be a reason for inactivity.
I just finished Newbie 16, won the game as mafia goon with my roleblocker partner lynched D1. OS said i was fine to join this game, so i did.what's your previous mafia experience?
and what about my accusation that was so neatly disguised as a question?I just finished Newbie 16, won the game as mafia goon with my roleblocker partner lynched D1. OS said i was fine to join this game, so i did.
I will be happy to be of use to town.and what about my accusation that was so neatly disguised as a question?
I met him 3 times IRL - at tourneys. He pretends to have a man-crush on me ... probably to cover up the fact that he's in love with me and he can't stop thinking about me.Ryker, Gheb, what do you think of Xonar?
Yeah, thanks for repeating what has already been established by now for the third time.Gheb you know what I mean. Take responsibility for your votes because we don't know where L-1 is for everybody.
Man, this game. Appropriately, you are correct. Skype on my phone is no good, so I was just reading the topic while in class.For reasons, T-Block. Reasons.
Why are you set on it?
Raz, I see you viewing, but you're not on Skype. On your phone? I seem to recall a promise concerning this game and you and I. I'm holding up my end. You better make good.
Rajam's posts are obnoxiously fluffy. I expect them to change and for him to actually get serious but if he doesn't I won't object to lynching him.inferno, you've made two posts and they've been centred around that issue. tell me what you think of rajam's posts so far. do you think the votes on him are justified?
L2: Can drain life, causes the target to take one less to lynch, and one more for the user. PUBLICALLY NOTED. or maybe he could be an oracle.So Ryker, you picked (or claim to have picked) Thief L1, then?
:X
T-block has a point here, and Nickel tried to avoid the question, and has posted a few times since without contributing. This calls for a vote.vote: NickelbackR0cks
what say you to being useful as well as active, instead of putting up a facade of being active?
I avoided the question? I answered it shortly after that Nich.T-block has a point here, and Nickel tried to avoid the question, and has posted a few times since without contributing. This calls for a vote.
Unvote, Vote: Nickel
You avoided the question, he called you out on it, and then you said you'd be "happy to contribute to town". Which for the record you still haven't done.I avoided the question? I answered it shortly after that Nich.
I picked Auto-Potion.
Yeah, it was Megaman X, that's actually the last game I played before this one. There just haven't been many themes I enjoy and I've been busy with other stuff. I should definitely run my large at some point...Nich, what was the last game we played together in? MMX?
I missed you, I love your activity.