Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
What? No?
Hahaha. I don't know who you are, but you're my new friend.
Haha, I'm flattered. But I'm a guy.
Wrong. I am not voting Tom at this moment because I want to see what it takes for him to contribute. In most situations, players like to see reactions of others under pressure. In this situation, I want to see Tom's playstyle when not under pressure. Hate meta if you want, I am of a similar mind. But it's best to know when meta is clouding one's thoughts and opinions, and when it allows one to figure out the best way to read a player, as well as what environments said player should be put in.
Nope.
The early game is one of the best times to lynch an inactive. Mid game as well, since we've had time to see how the player's activity has been through more of the game, while not being in the endgame, where it's too late and you have to find scum right then. And if the player is a power role, he can say "hey, I'm a ****ing power role!". And then we figure out what to do from there. The fear of killing someone with a good ability is only going to hold you back. Chances need to be taken. And having a player that isn't going to contribute or scum hunt, and is just doing what he can to get by, isn't worth keeping around, in most situations, even if he has the chance of having a stronger ability.
Hopefully the night phase will take up some of this time. That's quite awhile, haha.And also, if you guys are going to hate on me for being inactive... well, I am not going to have a computer from Wednesday-Monday.
Hush, you! I'm enjoying it ^^;
I have never played in a mafia game where scum was not allowed to talk to each other during the day.
I did nothing of the such. He thought I said something that I did not, and I responded as such. Look at his response. He knows that I did not dodge his question.
Because I wanted to see Panta's reaction to my vote.
Oh? I posted about Seph. Are you sure "ignore" is the right word? And no, I can't remember ever playing with Seph before. But I could be wrong, I've played quite a bit of mafia.
Because you are my least favorite type of player. The player that tries to interfere with one's ways of putting others in a situation where a specific reactions can be gathered. The player that looks at a vote and immediately tries to protect that player by throwing others that have similar faults into the pot, regardless of the fact that the "accuser" isn't trying to lynch the voted player, but merely fishing for reactions. I don't know whether you are one of the many that believe that votes' purposes are merely to lynch players, or if you want to be a hero, or whatever the reason may be. But you annoy me. There's possibly more to it than that, but I'm not entirely sure myself. This is just what I'm able to put to words.
This is the same type of annoying post. I will respond to it in a moment.
Same opinion here. Starting to think him to be the best lynch option for the day. Do you agree?
Seik, please respond to this.
I don't remember this. Are you referring to Seik asking me what I thought of you? I never singled you out. I never said that Ignatius was undeserving of being listed, and don't know why you would say that I think that.
J asked why your vote wasn't on Seph, you answered with why you wern't trying to lynch Panta. But I'll stop pushing it.
Fair enough.
That's an awfully specific type of player but fair enough. I can see where you're coming from.
Maybe. Depends on what reasoning AM provides for his reads. If they're solid, then yes.
There are absolutely no posts that suggest that you were pushing Acro. That's also a thing RR, you haven't been doing much at all by yourself. All you have been doing is sitting there and answering people's questions but not scum-hunting on your own. You are being opportunistic and lurky while doing no scum-hunting at all, as Seik/Hilt put it and I agree to that notion. There is also the only thing that is noticeable from you is that you are policing inactives.
Seik town, Hilt town
This has to be a troll.
Note my initial dislike of lurking, which is nothing new to me at all. I have in plenty of other games, many which you have been in, that I hate inactives. Yet you ignored this.
Me fully admitting this before. And you ignore this.
"I got better meta" fair enough.
Note I said this far earlier than before so the inactive pushes did not come out of nowhere and not without reason.
Note these posts do not add much in terms of scum hunting and nor did they affirm anything good with town. He assumes J:Ryu aren't a scum team, his reasons aren't strong bit it is an easy connection to make. This did not come out of my ***.
My follow ups to this and questions, on which I placed my vote on a scum pick. Yet you called me out later for not placing a vote.
He admits his reason to ignore JTB was bull. And how he wanted to forgo rebuttals to him.
Wither JTB was competent or not did not concern me. It was the sole fact he was trying to make JTB look incompetent as mod confirmed town concerned me, only scum would want to do something like that. Which is exactly what I meant with this post here.Vote was due to his pushing on JTB, even ignoring his first posts he has been placing discontent on JTB. JTB has not done anything from what I can see to be shoved aside. He is cleared town so he has town movtives alone. Acro ignoring him concerns me.
Which adds nothing.
Lists almost every option, and doesn't really do much with it. Let's us try and figure it out.
Me already acknowledging this before.I barely remember Dissidia at points but were you in the hydra that got the one shot watcher? JTB was scum in that game, and got caught by the watcher. More or less in this game it's you for what looks like placing doubt on JTB's scum hunting from what it looks like, I'll redread Dissidia later but for the most part your placing distrust on JTB, which to me seems to be what scum wants to do to town.
I may have confused my previous post, I ment your frustration led to you ignoring him later. Poor wording on my part.
@J: sorry missed you question on my phone, Seikend is nullish town, he is putting some good effort in learning others.
My reasoning was in plain sight, right there.
When I have meta on an inactive I have a lot more experience with and know I distrust his ability to get active, then yes I will focus on him more than others.
Post your reasons with quotes.
He's entertaining. Null other than that. Mostly due to me not understanding his statements about yourself and J.
What is there to agree with, really? A good bit of it is just his unexplained opinion. I don't particularly find Seikend or you scummy, as of this moment. He's left a lot of holes that have been questioned. I'm waiting for him to fill these holes before I decide on if I agree with what he's saying or not. That said, for the same reason, I don't have much of a read on him. Null at the moment, as I stated above.
Ugh. This came out the completely wrong. I sound like a snob, lol.
I... never said I liked Seikend?
The tone of this suggests you don't like Seikend, what makes you think that?
You never explained why btw so can you do that too? Acro you have a bit, Seph you say he's inactive, never explained Panta though.
Kind of brusque but meh. Anyways here ya go.
[/collapse]
It seems like you need "special attention". Since unless the question is custom fit specifically for you, you don't have to answer it.
Now that's an interesting choice of words. When I think of a person slipping under my radar activity wise, logically, I continue that thought process and think. "Who else has slipped under my radar?" Now with that said, I was confused as to why you chose not to mention the other players as well.
I just don't answer stupid questions. If someone accused me of doing or saying something that I did not do or say, and I correct them, they are fully capable of asking me the correct question afterwards. But I did not single you out. I did not say that Ignatius was undeserving of being listed, and the fact that you would think that I said either of those things is beyond me.
1+1=2 times reposted, Dad. You stupid 000s aren't getting away from my zetta sexy rhymes without some fatherly rhythms of your own. Add to the iterations!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiF89D9cGNk
(click that you factoring hectopascals!)
So Dad equals X, for this equation
Our read on you is a mathematics sensation.
How we converse will be rap relation
Can you keep up with our multiplication?
Alright, you dad of a digit, now listen real well
How you entered this game was a certain town tell
To defend Acrostic, goddamn that was swell
Other reads are not equal, for that go to hell.
All in all, you lean town though, but there you can't dwell.
Some of your scum reads have yet to factor.
LST is a null, if his lynch you were after.
Your math is wrong and a major read detractor.
From town tell to leaning, which certainly matters.
But J's matrix is empty, and not a solution
J plus Dad scum is not a reasonable conclusion.
If one must go, it's J's I'd call an illusion
So Dad must be town, despite his confusion.
Now look over our math and check our resolution.
You're claiming to solve variables for players but the solutions are not the same as ours.
This is like pulling teeth when I am this tired.
However, I agree with LST that the reasoning for his hydra vote was pretty bad and just not correct. I don't even get the stretching vibe like at all. Also your read on Acro came acrossed to me as you saying he was just null, but at the same time you just posted that you wouldn't mind being on the Acro wagon. I'm asking you to clarify these things.
Usually people like to use their words to clarify bad wording w.r.t. your Panta thing.
FOIL! First, Outer, Inner, Last! Or did you forget the formula so fast? Is this why your equation changed at that pace? Do the math, radian, it's not that complicated.
Yo professor, we've shown our work. You're going to have to do better to lead your students to the solution.
