#HBC | Red Ryu
Red Fox Warrior
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2008
- Messages
- 27,486
- Location
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- NNID
- RedRyu_Smash
- 3DS FC
- 0344-9312-3352
Not* gotta correct that.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yes we can :DLST, can you go into more detail as to why Seik would be the best lynch?
He says that he'll prolly be able to read AM the easiest and that the current content is garbage, and that was a good sign and I liked where he was going with it. And all the questions could have provided some really good content and conversation.@ Kuz/Soup I'll be honest, I think I'll be able to read you guys the easiest, since I've played with you the most. If I have you as null I'll assume you're scum. Problem?
Current content is mostly garbage.
Tom's post looks artificial, but that might be his posting style. If his future posts look consistent I'll ignore it.
Other than that nothing else looks that scummy to me so far. Just a whole bunch of nulls.
And a "big null" on Seph in response to J's question to him are the extent of the reads in that post.Comfortable with J, LST, Panta, Acrostic and Inferno as town. Everyone else is null.
I can agree on RR but his issues with AM are that they haven't justified anything, but I don't agree, they've been active and providing reads since they started posting. With RR it seems like he may have been setting himself up to hop on a budding RR wagon as well.RR being lurky and opportunistic. Not scumhunting at all. He can go.
@RR Thought's on AM's introduction to the game? Do all of the active players read as town to you?
AM's intro is terabad, just pointing at things and saying gross. No justification at all to anything, they can go too.
Where RR infers that only having two scum picks is bad, which comes only a couple posts after this:J, why is it only me and Panta are scum picks?
3. J
10. Acrostic
11. Sephiroths Masamune
12. Panta
13. Ignatius
14. Seikend
Die!
That's 7 people that RR apparently feels comfortable with dying...that's just extreme.Throw Tom in there as well.
Wut. Pretty sure I was one of the first to talk about RR in my #228. but okay.Seikend that post...
Sorry that I haven't been posting as much as I'd like to, but I just hate having to go from account to account (especially when my hydra partner seems totally MIA x_x (Gosh darn Gordito!!!)). I'm not 100% sold on Ruy scum atm, and it might warrant a reread, but for now, I think our best option is still upon Seikend (that 250 seems like an attempt to slide into the building Ruy wagon), Seph (half for his inactiveness, and half for the fact that his "coming back" post was really a big post saying a lot of nothing). I can't get a read on Dad, so I'm going to trust J to help me out with em (J what's your read on Dad?). Everybody else that I didn't mention are either town and fine for me, or inactive and vigbait.
Seik, can I get an update on your reads on some of the players that have posted now? I.e. Panta/AM/Seph
Why? I questioned Hilt, I found his answers good and so I stopped pushing him and looked elsewhere. I'm not going to keep arguing if I think I'm wrong.This is why I dislike Seikend.
He states, maybe and then proceeds to vote. Doesn't make sense to me. Then he posts a lot of I agree with you while having little to provide for himself.
Dad is the Kuz/Soup Hydra, but carry on.Gordito head here, haven't gotten to talk to the July head because she's always so darn busy (July where are you?!?). Anyways still feeling solid in our Seikend read.
Yes we can :D
Seikend's first post was legit and with the game just getting going he really seemed like he'd provide content. Here:
He says that he'll prolly be able to read AM the easiest and that the current content is garbage, and that was a good sign and I liked where he was going with it. And all the questions could have provided some really good content and conversation.
Wut.Yet in his next post, his #105, he doesn't follow up on any of his questions he asked before. It's also disappointing because this:
And a "big null" on Seph in response to J's question to him are the extent of the reads in that post.
They weren't subtle. I straight up say that they're scummy and go. Do I need to write out my suspicions in a 10 line paragraph for you to notice it? Do I need to write them in big bold red text?#128 he puts his vote on Hilt, but also addresses his suspicions of Red Ryu. His #228 addresses some questions to his scum read Hilt, but ends with two very subtle statements about other players that can "go" too:
They haven't justified anything.I can agree on RR but his issues with AM are that they haven't justified anything, but I don't agree, they've been active and providing reads since they started posting. With RR it seems like he may have been setting himself up to hop on a budding RR wagon as well.
BECAUSE THE ENTIRE POINT OF THE RR VOTE IS THAT HE'S NOT DOING ANYTHING.Finally #250 has no content and then just a sudden vote on RR, for what reason? He's feeling better about Hilt, but nothing new to add about RR since his last post.
Did a reread and read his newest post, I'm not seeing it.LST has posted barely anything. He has restated his reads about 3 or 4 times while saying that people should post more.... when he hasn't been posting.
It seems like he is trying to give the impression that he is contributing, but he just isn't.
I really don't know how you initially got a town read from LST at the time you wrote #217. LST had pushed on Ignatius and hadn't derived a response. I'm curious what you are basing your town read on from LST as I saw filler. I took RR focusing on easy targets to him just trying to go with a policy lynch as he said earlier in the day.J said:Huh? I didn't think I was white-knighting but if so, aight. I do tend to defend my town reads. RR has landed on my watch list for watching inactives and for reasons previously stated. It seems RR is taking the cop-out route and not giving any scum-reads as of late and just focusing on easy targets.
I think he is horribly misguided and I don't like him, however I'm not sure he is scum. He isn't helping that much, but at the same time I don't find it particularly scummy with the content up to this post.RR said:Due to recent games I have had with people, I dislike lurkers more and more, I'm doing a Purple PL on him every game if he lurks like he did in recent games as scum. I'm doing this in every game now, if I see it too much, I'm lynching it.
Dad should have kept his vote up, but I don't find it scummy as there was no incentive to keeping it up. If no one is going to join your wagon then there isn't much point in sticking your vote somewhere it isn't going to materialize. I don't believe it was a reactionary measure, I think Dad figured that for now he was at a lost cause.J said:You are actually agreeing to what I am saying in this paragraph. You feel Dad should have kept his vote up, that's the major reason for my vote on Dad. I disliked the unvote because it came off so quickly when pressure came his way.
AM's list differs from Seikend's list. AM indicated scum picks and on the surface I do agree that it is the type of list I could go with after doing a read through this thread. Seikend's list is just a giant town read with a null bomb underneath. It's really immaterial and doesn't help orient discussion at all. When I reconsidered, I really don't see how mentioning such reads is beneficial aside from aesthetic purposes.J said:Why aren't you also asking AM this?
Panta's most recent post is typical Panta. The same with Panta's play up to the post, which is also Panta. I thought you would be aware of this.J said:Panta, I was actually shocked by your most recent post.
I really want you to elaborate on all your reads with regards to J, LST, Panta, and Inferno with the information you had at that point which was #105 IIRC.Seikend said:Because I'm pri awesome. I'll explain a read if I need to. What reads do you disagree with? Why?
I really don't see you as pushing on me. I disagree with the clear and doubt their ability to read, but I don't see how that makes me scummy. The clear is guaranteed for being the least biased source of information but that doesn't mean that it is the most accurate source of reads and picks. If JTB voted for someone else would you sheep it? Right now the consensus up to this post is that you are either sheeping or targeting inactives and at this point I am losing the desire to lynch someone else if this is all the input you have to give. I've asked you to tell me how my actions can be portrayed as scummy. Yes I have doubts on the clear's decision, because the clear is wrong about me. I don't have faith in someone who has voted on me based on two posts and is using dubious logic. I wasn't in Dissidia. I read the entire game to see how JTB was getting his scum read and it is not similar because there was no clear in that game and I'm not the target of a lynch trying to throw the vote off on someone else based on IIoA alone.RR said:Have you been reading reading earlier or did I not post it? I pushed on Acro's earlier posts, recently I have been answering you because you have asked me questions.
Hilt said:Keep in mind. I don't want Panta to die because of that reason, I want him to see him react because of that reason. And yeah. I plan to keep an eye on him.
Acrostic said:@Hilt: Did you believe that Panta was intentionally inactive?
I was trying to find a reason for the pressure vote. I kind of phrased this poorly. Ignore it. I already think I know how you'll respond to the follow-up question I had to this so asking it is kind of mundane and asking it at this point is pointless. I have a read based on your response.Hilt said:What? No?
Daddy hasn't posted anything new so my stance is still that he is null town. I have a gut feeling that RR is town, but I'm not really sure why he sees me as scum and why he isn't putting analysis to how I type, my tone, or my shift in positions. If he thinks I'm scum, he's not scum hunting me. He's not really attacking me and I don't know what he's trying to get out of his vote on me. I've responded to all his dialogue but he refuses to really comment on mine. I want to say that he is just a horribad townie and an easy push for scum.J said:Panta/Acro, thoughts on RR and thoughts on Daddy.
Not all my posts are going to be me scum hunting. I will answer questions, defend myself, and also try to draw connections. Attempting to take someone's posts and say, these aren't about scum hunting is cherry picking because no one dedicates all their posts to hunting scum. Also I don't see how I did something bad with town. Other than that you offered your own paraphrase of my paragraphs. I don't really know what to say other than your paraphrase is interesting.Note these posts do not add much in terms of scum hunting and nor did they affirm anything good with town. He assumes J:Ryu aren't a scum team, his reasons aren't strong bit it is an easy connection to make. This did not come out of my ***.
I will admit that I shouldn't have ignored JTB. But I did, because I would have just insulted him and it would have gotten ugly. My reason to ignore JTB wasn't bull. I ignored him because I seriously saw me talking to him at that time to be anti-town in the aspect that I would have detracted by fighting with the clear. I didn't immediately answer the questions he asked, but I did do them when it seemed like ignoring him wasn't a viable solution.RR said:He admits his reason to ignore JTB was bull. And how he wanted to forgo rebuttals to him.
Actually it pretty much pointed to the fact that I read Dissidia and found out that JTB's case was b.s. The only reason that I finished was because of Radical Fiction and I thought that comic response would illustrate my point in an efficient manner.RR said:Which adds nothing.
The purpose of bullet points isn't to list options bro. It's to organize my thoughts instead of barraging you with a giant paragraph. Let's touch base:RR said:Lists almost every option, and doesn't really do much with it. Let's us try and figure it out.
JTB is incompetent because I know that I'm town and I'm sure that his reason is pretty b.s. You have actually never touched or expanded on JTB's initial arguments on me. That's because they are immaterial and based on Dissidia. A scum tactic where someone tries to vote the clear is stupid. A scum tactic where someone gets pissy with the clear is stupid. I'm not playing dumb or scum. I'm not trying to get buddy buddy with the clear. I get no benefit from doing what I did as scum. If you're going to make the case then elaborate.RR said:Wither JTB was competent or not did not concern me. It was the sole fact he was trying to make JTB look incompetent as mod confirmed town concerned me, only scum would want to do something like that. Which is exactly what I meant with this post here.
Panta, do something that isn't fluffy and something that is helpful.
Vote: Panta
Overall out of all the people who have posted seriously as of yet I have the most disdain for Panta. He hasn't done anything besides ask little questions that don't add much nor has he done anything by himself and his overall tone towards Acro's question is bad simply being it's a tad defensive/acusatory at Acro. (110)
J said:Panta, I was actually shocked by your most recent post. You said scum can't talk during the DayPhase when they can, does this affect your read on Acro? Plus you were talking about Hilt and how you didn't like him that much and I was seeing where you were coming from then you didn't vote for him. o_o You end up voting LST for "bandwagoning" you when he never voted for you. Plus you sound as if you are placing the suspicion of going for inactives on LST's slot when he hasn't been barking up that tree *looks at RR*. Your LST vote looks like the actual bandwagon vote considering it seems your strongest scum-read is Hilt.
I really dislike your post but there is just one sentence in there that makes me falter in voting you.
WIFOM and the like but this sounds like a really obv newbTown tell. I'm gonna think on this more.Panta said:You do realize that scum are not allowed to discuss the game outside of the thread while it is during the dayphase?
I don't know if this is a gambit or what, but this lack of knowledge about the mafia mechanic makes me think Acrostic is newbtown. ****. Really wanted to have vengeance.
Unvote
Melee Maf.@Seikend
Those are the reasons for Panta scummy but I really am finding it hard to believe he is scum. Just atm based on players and posting, he is the second scummiest.
Also we I honestly didn't know that(w.r.t. our reads) because I don't think we have ever been on the same side before. ^^"
Currently it's AM until they respond.Oh! That's right you were apart of Lil Jon. Forgot since that slot got modkilled.
Well aight then. *back to responding to other things*
Can you tell me Seik your second scum-pick? If you say one name I'm giving you a cookie jsyk.
Awwww yeah this is gonna be such much fun for me now, js.Doesn't look like there's a whole lot going on but I'll try to catch up as soon as possible. Thanks, all!
Seik town, Hilt town RR scum
Vote: Red Ryu
J said:What changed your opinion from Null to Scum, if I may ask? o.o
Dad said:Kuzi did, basically.
Dad said:I really don't see how you can't understand what i'm saying, and i have to re-word it, it's clear as day. >_> Or maybe because people aren't understanding where i'm coming from because of 'bad wording' or whatever reason, so it's not worth arguing about it if people are going to generally disagree with it.
Dad said:this is my goddamn answer, my read stays the same but there is not enough fire to get something going, it's best to drop it and look somewhere else if people are going to disagree to it.
Soupa said:In a word, i talked to my other head and we had a bickering of sort. hydra logs aren't able to be posted, so i'll keep it short. Kuz tentatively disagreed with my suspicion of LST, and thought that his Iggy vote was justified and felt that i was being a tad exaggerating wrt my point. i tried arguing my stance against LST but Kuz just didn't see it as that way, we dragged this on for a good hour or so, and have formed a new place to look, once Kuz pops his head up again will we hopefully present something again. Panta's points aren't anything special, and shouldn't be seen as that, there's a lot of speculation, but i'll need to talk to kuz about it. RR is Null.
I've done this but I'll go again haha. I am calling RR scum because I dislike what he has done this game thus far. He hasn't scum-hunted really at all besides his tiny little push on you in the beginning but even then, it didn't hold much weight/didn't make sense. Lately the most he can be seen doing is policing inactives and that's it. When asked to give reads he cops out with saying, "The inactives are my scum-reads." which doesn't really help anything at the current time considering the entire game has a lot of inactives.J, I would like feedback on my RR read. He is your scum pick and I am curious how you construe his behavior as scummy.
This means you have him resting as a null, correct?To be completely honest with you J, I'm having the hardest time separating FF9 Seikend from Newbie Mafia Seikend. The discrepancy between how he is playing as town in this game and as scum in the other game seems pretty distinct to me. He seems much more relaxed in how he construes his points without having the non-committed feel I got from him in Newbie mafia. He feels like town to me. However this is considering that I have meta-bias or meta-blinds when I do a skim through of what he is saying. That leaves me back to my impression of LST who hasn't really materialized in this discussion. I just feel that they aren't striking any embers for me.
Seikend is null town. I just finished making my list and realized that RR does sit on the bottom of my reads along with Dad. I really want to see more from both of them. To be honest I am not okay with a Panta lynch as an alternative given that I believe his dumb tell.This means you have him resting as a null, correct?
YES!Also, to be final, do the scum have the ability to daytalk? Yes or no. Put the answer in like bright colors because I keep missing it whenever I ask. >_>
I have finished reading and I'm making my post now but... I can't tell any difference between this seikend and newbie-game seikend because seikend wasn't even really there in most of that game. He just seemed to be stepping into Pheonix's absent shoes.To be completely honest with you J, I'm having the hardest time separating FF9 Seikend from Newbie Mafia Seikend. The discrepancy between how he is playing as town in this game and as scum in the other game seems pretty distinct to me. He seems much more relaxed in how he construes his points without having the non-committed feel I got from him in Newbie mafia.