Thoughts:
Seikend's #31 is the first post that stood out to me content-wise. I like his response to getting called out for lurking, and from there he generates questions that provoke conversation and continue to bridge the gap between the RVS feel of early game and actual content.
People who haven't posted, pick one of Acrostic/Seikend and tell me what you think about them? Do you agree with what they both said w.r.t. Tom?
Acrostic's posts are hard to read but they are reasonable. I remember thinking the same thing when I watched Newb 10 so he's null for me right now, I really didn't glean anything from his innocent child mix-up. The only thing about Acrostic I haven't liked so far is the last line of his #97, it just seems so out of character with the rest of his posts and even the very rational tone at the beginning of the post.
@RR: Thoughts on Acrostic's theorizing about relationships? Also do you think #97 expressed actual frustration, or AtE?
I don't agree with the comments on Tom's play looking artificial, he just seems blunt and I don't see that as a problem.
Yeah pretty much this. I'm not an extremely vocal person. Tend to wait for opportunities a bit more than I should, but it's just how I play. But we're, what, four days into the first phase? Too funny.
Good to know, my play style is similar so I will read you with this in mind.
@Hilt: What are your thoughts on J so far?
Other than that, not much to comment on so far. I like our vote right now.