- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 26,545
he overslept and didn't show up to his r2 pools is what i heard at the venue
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
What does that have to do with Meta Knight's planking?There was a 35 LGL in place.
i swear i remember him telling me he just wanted to focus on teams and didnt feel like he was playing that well. kadaj did some similar garbage lmaohe overslept and didn't show up to his r2 pools is what i heard at the venue
http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=13444023&postcount=1345Orion where's that GIMR quote from? LMAO
I get a lot of irrational hate at the mention of that rule haha.After watching Mew2king time so many people out I don't blame people for banning MK. I think a rule should be made where MK can't win by timeouts period since he is simply too good at it. This would mean that if any game times out then it's an automatic victory for MK's opponent. And yes this is not fair to MK mains but it would just be the price they have to pay for playing by far and wide the best character in the game.
But winning by time should be considered a legit tacticAfter watching Mew2king time so many people out I don't blame people for banning MK. I think a rule should be made where MK can't win by timeouts period since he is simply too good at it. This would mean that if any game times out then it's an automatic victory for MK's opponent. And yes this is not fair to MK mains but it would just be the price they have to pay for playing by far and wide the best character in the game.
are you mentally ********After watching Mew2king time so many people out I don't blame people for banning MK. I think a rule should be made where MK can't win by timeouts period since he is simply too good at it. This would mean that if any game times out then it's an automatic victory for MK's opponent. And yes this is not fair to MK mains but it would just be the price they have to pay for playing by far and wide the best character in the game.
Are you more mentally ********?Honestly, just banning *** CP's would help with our MK issue. But I guess we just suck.
Said the Kirby main.Are you more mentally ********?
Hey, I look much sexier eating people than you doSaid the Kirby main.
No, what I said makes perfect sense and many agree.
I keep thinking you are my girlfriend lmao it's so trippy. Same avatar.Hey, I look much sexier eating people than you do
But the underlying issue is that even if getting rid of a load of stages would make MK slightly less broken, it's better to ban one character (that overcentralizes the entire metagame) than a bunch of stages that have nothing wrong with them.
What justification do you have to make any stage legal? About as much as I do to say Brawl tourneys should played on pencil and paper, D&D style. Any kind of criteria you want to use is arbitrarily contrived as are mine. My ideology on a stagelist should be to have the least amount of inconsistent impact on results as possible; yours are probably somewhere along the lines of "If it isn't broken then it should be legal" which is one that is slowly dying out in our community as MLG has had less and less influence on our rulesets.Which 2 stages would you say have nothing wrong with them? Heck, what justification do you have to ban every stage except 6-7?
I'm saying Brinstar and RC are the ones that really give MK a noticeable upper hand. But just playing on neutrals would be fine and would probably help with our MK problem. Look at Japan.Hey, I look much sexier eating people than you do
But the underlying issue is that even if getting rid of a load of stages would make MK slightly less broken, it's better to ban one character (that overcentralizes the entire metagame) than a bunch of stages that have nothing wrong with them.
lolI keep thinking you are my girlfriend lmao it's so trippy. Same avatar.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=317506What justification do you have to make any stage legal? About as much as I do to say Brawl tourneys should played on pencil and paper, D&D style. Any kind of criteria you want to use is arbitrarily contrived as are mine. My ideology on a stagelist should be to have the least amount of inconsistent impact on results as possible; yours are probably somewhere along the lines of "If it isn't broken then it should be legal" which is one that is slowly dying out in our community as MLG has had less and less influence on our rulesets.
Two stages with no inconsistent impact on the game are BF and FD obviously.
MK has the upper hand on every stage in every matchup; Otherwise he wouldn't be broken. You want an example of stages that give a noticeable upper hand? Look at Diddy getting his best stages as starters.I'm saying Brinstar and RC are the ones that really give MK a noticeable upper hand. But just playing on neutrals would be fine and would probably help with our MK problem. Look at Japan.
First of all, thank you for actually giving a list and explaining it instead of just whining about how broken other stages are or how FD da bess.I just typed something long as **** three times and my internet went out all three times while typing it. I'm going to be editing this post a lot.
BF
FD
SV
YI
PS1
PS2
HB
Is an extremely flexible, yet manageably small, stage list that doesn't favour MK in a strong fashion.
What you're missing is that it's not the job of the stagelist to nerf and buff characters. Yet that's exactly what it's doing! Our "starter list" has artificially buffed ICs, Falco, and the like (notice how almost the entire top tier sans MK is grounded.), because they get to play on good stages, and then we ban anything slightly controversial because it's "cheap" or it "changes gameplay."small, stage list that doesn't favour MK
No. It just removes the artificial buffs that other characters have.You are right that it artificially buffs Falco and IC's
<______________________________<Two stages with no inconsistent impact on the game are BF and FD obviously.
The impact might be drastic but it's consistent.
Ah, I see. Agreed.I didn't actually mean to contradict your statement, Omni but more the general consensus that "fixing" rules is just there to "arbitrarily accomodate MK", when it's actually the current ruleset that uses a lot of arbitrary rules that make MK so powerful in the first place ... so when people argue to change rules we're not "making rules to make MK tolerable" ... we ask for arbitrary rules that make MK "intolerable" to be removed.
Edit @ Mav: No it's not. The impact might be drastic but it's consistent.
If a large legal stage list with stages that haven't even been proven broken for some 3 years are decent for some characters, then... uh... idk lolAlso, if a small legal stage list is good for the top characters, it just means those characters are good >_>