#HBC | Red Ryu
Red Fox Warrior
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2008
- Messages
- 27,486
- Location
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- NNID
- RedRyu_Smash
- 3DS FC
- 0344-9312-3352
Was town but I'm asking to verifiy.What's your read on me?
rewyu wants an answer.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Was town but I'm asking to verifiy.What's your read on me?
Basically gheb scum makes sense to me because of the reasoning by..... Someone. On a phone and it takes forever to find posts. However I agree completely that gheb had done an entire 180 on PJB and that's why I found him scummy. If he chooses to actually explain why he did so I'd feel better but right now I'm really wary of him.Actually, you know what?
@Kantrip, BW: Can I get your take on this?
Well, my 755 wasn't actually complete WIFOM. It's true that I use it to defend myself, but I think my defense is still good. Foxy thinks I'm scum because I defended PJB. Pointing out the flaws in this thought process might amount to a WIFOM defense but the flaws are legit nevertheless.Dislike the majority of this post. He talks a lot about using WIFOM and the risks associated or something like that, and proceeds to base this entire post on WIFOM. Probably going to reread and see if Swords makes more sense than Gheb.
1. It just so happens that an easy inactive seems the most likely to be PJB's partner based on my observations. Read my 750 for more details.Two more things I dislike about Sword:
1. He put his vote on FF. Pressuring an easy slot to pressure to see if it sticks. This isn't too bad, except for it goes with point 2.
2. Buys into the Gheb scum theory. Not only does he not grasp the full reasoning for why Gheb is suspicious, but Gheb defended PJB much like Swords did. Why is Swords allowed to use his crappy WIFOM defense and yet is perfectly justified voting Gheb? Hypocrisy at its finest.
I dislike that he's voting FF if he thinks Gheb is scummy for legit reasoning.
@sword: You got something on FF or...?
If you were to just say that I was being hypocritical though because I was defending myself from one action while attacking Gheb for the same, you'll simply be wrong.Gheb_01 - Weird interactions with PJB all around. Attacked PJB way too hard way too early. PJB defended himself in not a particularly unusual way. They attacked each other
for awhile, when ultimatly PJB didn't read Gheb as scum, just "Gheb being Gheb." Gheb later goes on to defend PJB. This is a really tricky to call. Why would Gheb
defend PJB? However, he didn't really do it directly, instead opting out to attack inactives, which Kantrip pointed out was unusual for him. Was vague about why
PJB was town. Late into the Day he went into stubborn "I ain't going to explain ****" mode. Interacted with plenty of people which is good. Overall likelihood of Gheb
being PJB's partner: 6/10.
@BW and Kantrip: I was actually looking for your thoughts on Foxy's 760. What do you think about the point he brings up?Basically gheb scum makes sense to me because of the reasoning by..... Someone. On a phone and it takes forever to find posts. However I agree completely that gheb had done an entire 180 on PJB and that's why I found him scummy. If he chooses to actually explain why he did so I'd feel better but right now I'm really wary of him.
![]()
To post on what exactly? Foxy claiming and/or your "guilty" on him?I want everyone to post on this.
Well it's pretty easy to "better lay out" someone when they actually have more content. At the very least, JTB's has said something, and I liked his post against FF.Swords, in your notes JTB is a lot better laid out than FF.
What pushes FF that extra one tenth ?
Cuz from mypov you have more reason to vote JTB then FF right now
The difference between me and Gheb is that Gheb was more indirect with his defense on PJB.
Man One Piece is awful.
His reaction and the situation, you've avoid it entirely.To post on what exactly? Foxy claiming and/or your "guilty" on him?
Basically gheb scum makes sense to me because of the reasoning by..... Someone. On a phone and it takes forever to find posts. However I agree completely that gheb had done an entire 180 on PJB and that's why I found him scummy. If he chooses to actually explain why he did so I'd feel better but right now I'm really wary of him.
![]()
@BW and Kantrip: I was actually looking for your thoughts on Foxy's 760. What do you think about the point he brings up?
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but he's talking about the relationship between PJB and Gheb? I mean, it was weird at the beginning, because of Joker's interactions, but then it became weird because Gheb jumped off the bandwagon without as much as a reason why. I don't like the idea that he just doesn't trust anyone else's ideas and jumped off of the wagon because of that. It doesn't strike me as.... townie I guess :/. It's kinda hard to explain but I don't like that he doesn't trust anyone else and was defending Joker in the way that he did.Well I think there would be no reason for him to shoot your case down RIGHT THEN AND THERE. I mean isn't it weird he treated him, his attacker, that way? I'm sure he wouldn't connect himself to his own buddy that way. Unless you think otherwise.
Why is he scum outside the report?Sorry. I've been at work a lot the past couple days. I'm on break now, so I've skimmed. I believe that report on foxy cause I still think he's scum. Ummmmm. If you want to ask me questions I might entertain to answer, feel free and ill get to it by tomorrow hopefully.
Because it's RuyKantrip, why are you so certain it's a gambit over results being messed with ?
I don't like the idea that he just doesn't trust anyone else's ideas and jumped off of the wagon because of that. It doesn't strike me as.... townie I guess :/.
I can see both points of view. For the sake of not tunneling, I am going to reread it once I stop being sick.Kantrip, tell me which scenario is more likely:
a.) I am PJB's scummate. I immediately pushed his lynch from the very beginning, provided a good 50% of the reasoning that got him lynched eventually and did not budge, even when he was put at L-1 at one point. Then, for some reason, I decided that it actually makes much more sense to deflect suspicion onto inactive players all of a sudden and started being completely upfront about not lynching PJB anymore in order to defend him in the most amateurish fashion imagineable.
b.) I am town. I immediately was rubbed the wrong way by PJB's play and decided to give the already somewhat existing wagon some teeth by providing a good 50% of the reasoning that got him lynched eventually. But the fact that almost everybody joined the wagon asap and - other than AM - nobody provided any decent reasoning rubbed me the wrong way even more. I am not a player who is very confident in his reads and is easily convinced by decent points and I have a tendency to become very mistrusting on things that everybody seems to agree on. That was enough for me to change my mind for good.
![]()
This is true, at least.That's completely untrue. Like, wtf are you on, man? I've been so vocal against lynching PJB like the whole 2nd half of yesterDay and have made it AMPLE clear - so much that a whole bunch of people are toying with the idea that I might be his scum partner now. There was nothing subtle or indirect about how I defended PJB at all. You, on the other hand, had some notable instances where you defend PJB very indirectly and while you also were vocal about it at certain points you also have posts like #150 [page 4 with 40ppp] and#180 [page 5] plain and utterly reek of chainsaw defense. You only directly mentioned PJB when it became clear that your attacks against Kantrip and me weren't going to do anything [even though it still seems like you've kept the option open somewhat].
![]()
I guess it's the whole Trust no one thing. It's not really a good idea in a game based around support and trust in other's arguments to be the hipster of the group IMO. It doesn't really show good team building. I just view it as something to be looked at.What do you not like about it? What makes it look like a not-townie thing to do?
![]()
I went back to check and it seems that I am indeed on something. Posts 371, 372, 387, 401, 402, 403,444, 446, 451, 619, 667 are all posts where you defend PJB, so I guess I was just getting caught up in the fact that you were attacking inactives. I'll drop this point.That's completely untrue. Like, wtf are you on, man? I've been so vocal against lynching PJB like the whole 2nd half of yesterDay and have made it AMPLE clear - so much that a whole bunch of people are toying with the idea that I might be his scum partner now. There was nothing subtle or indirect about how I defended PJB at all. You, on the other hand, had some notable instances where you defend PJB very indirectly and while you also were vocal about it at certain points you also have posts like #150 [page 4 with 40ppp] and#180 [page 5] plain and utterly reek of chainsaw defense. You only directly mentioned PJB when it became clear that your attacks against Kantrip and me weren't going to do anything [even though it still seems like you've kept the option open somewhat].
![]()
His reaction and the situation, you've avoid it entirely.
His reaction was appropriate.K, it was.
Foxy is town. Kantrip likely town.
I hate JTB and Swords more.
When you said " myopic" I thought you were referring to Gheb attacking inactives (as in, "Gheb don't be nearsighted by attacking inactives").@ Swords: Why would I have voted for PJB at that point? I was discussing how despite the fact that he was a good informational lynch option, that we shouldn't be overly myopic and should consider other avenues. I was pushing for a deadline extension and more discussion pertaining to other players in the game while PJB was at either L-1 or L-2 IIRC. Why in the world would I push him closer to L-1 or outright lynch him when I was clearly stating that though lynching PJB did come with benefits independant of his then unknown alignment, we should also scrutinize other players that were getting a free pass through the day. You make it sound like me not voting for PJB was incongruent with my stance on him but it just straight up isn't. Quite the opposite is true actually.
@ RR: You say you tracked someone who allegedly doesn't even have a targeting power. Given that, one of you has to be lying about what happened last night or you're putting us through an exceptionally ****ty gambit. If it's the latter please do us a favor and cut the act. There's no sense mucking up the thread with bull**** like that when we already have a great flip to work with moving forward.
Or you avoided it to not get your hands dirty?His reaction was appropriate.
I avoided commenting on it because I thought you were gambiting and I didn't want to butt in. For what's the point of a gambit if it's pointed out?