WeirdChillFever
Smash Hero
Wowah, hidden gacha mechanics in Smash Bros.?Sure he is, I just summoned him several games ago.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Wowah, hidden gacha mechanics in Smash Bros.?Sure he is, I just summoned him several games ago.
Ok, but you know what I was saying. This is a DLC discussion board, we're talking about DLC. Waluigi may be in the game in a way, but he's still not in the game as a fully playable fighter like many other mario characters are. He's just been one of 100 assist trophies in the game for years now.We know, but in the greater context of Smash, he 'is' in. Sorta like how Isaac and Geno, both long-time requests, 'are' in.
Gotta add a mobile game rep for gacha mechanics.Wowah, hidden gacha mechanics in Smash Bros.?
Laughable.Waluigi still isn't in the game, he has a pretty huge fanbase that rivals those 3 characters
Well, if Waluigi fans are allowed to misconstrue "fan demand compared to " to mean Waluigi, then I'd say it's fair to misconstrue "isn't in the game" to include ATs.I don't know why people always latch onto the wording when somebody says "Waluigi isn't in the game" even though it's pretty clear what context I'm saying this in.
Seriously, it's just annoying, not even funny.
Are they really trying to look outside the Smash fanbase THAT much with FP2, though? Steve is a no brainer, but look at...pretty much everyone else in FP2 minus maybe Kazuya. Min Min was more about either keeping ARMS relevant or finally having time for Sakurai to make his ARMS rep, FFVII fans would've already bought the game for Cloud, and Smash helped grow XC's fandom with Shulk giving the two series fandom overlap already.Has anyone considered the simple idea that we haven't got that many supposed "fan demand" characters simply because in terms of pure fan demand, there is no other character left in terms of sheer fan demand compared to and that is precisely the reason why Nintendo is largely looking outside the scope of the Smash fanbase in order to draw in new fans instead of appealing to the existing fanbases?
I didn't misconstrue anything though. Waluigi clearly has a level of interest in this game that is comparable to those 3. He's very popular over the internet and through the casual fanbase and gets like millions of views on youtube.Well, if Waluigi fans are allowed to misconstrue "fan demand compared to " to mean Waluigi, then I'd say it's fair to misconstrue "isn't in the game" to include ATs.
disney does indeed exist.Imagine running a video game company and you're asked if one of your characters could appear in SMASH of all things and you say "Nah"
im not talking out of my ass here. Sakurai is on record saying how hard the BASE ROSTER was to put together and make happen, and they still didnt get plant done in time for the base roster. Forget the DLC entriely. These 3rd party characters are often dlc because negotiations dont always go according to plan or especially under the strict timeline of development in something like a triple A videogame. I assumed it was common knowledge particularily here on this website how diffcult this game had it to get characters back. A while back people did talk about how many characters would get cut next game id assume we'd be closer to smash 4 base roster size than brawl. but its possible smash goes smaller than 4 and does mechanical and gameplay changes maybe to make 1v1 better. they already took step in ultimate with parries and throw breaks both being added but honestly both mechanics need refinement.Sure, it may not be realistic to expect a fighting game to retain its roster, especially one this size, but that doesn't mean I'll buy a game with half the roster just cuz it's Smash. I'd choose to adhere to a new schism in the fanbase a la Melee. Logistical limitations are all well and good, but I personally don't give a damn. I love playing Cloud and Seph and Greninja and Wolf and tons of other characters. You take them away, I'll just happily stay behind. That's exactly what I did with Pokemon. They started excluding tons of my competitive pokemon, so I flipped them the bird and quit. Any time they finally gather the budget/gumption to make a Pokemon Stadium 3 (or something that prioritizes inclusion for battles over story) that allows me to play my competitive teams again, I'll gladly come back. Until then, no money from me. Maybe they don't care? I know I don't. Not anymore. Understanding a short-coming doesn't mean I have to like it or reward it.
As for whether the next smash will have a smaller roster, that seems like a fairly realistic possibility, but how do you know? "Not a logistical possibility?" So you know exactly what kind of hardware Nintendo's going to use for their next system? You know all the private dealings of the 3rd party companies? You can read Sakurai's thoughts? Hot dog, fill us in then! I could use some spoilers!
I mean, 100% debatable.As a whole the community mostly moves on.
They don't understand the concept of diminishing returns.I have to say, the fact that people get mad over Waluigi, a 1st party Nintendo character who's pretty popular, getting added to a 1st party Nintendo title is so confusing to me. What is it about Waluigi that makes some people so mad?
So, real talk, in the chance, and I emphasize chance here, that Ultimate does end on a bang... then what? Then what will you say?They don't understand the concept of diminishing returns.
I'd argue Sora and Waluigi come close. Sora is popular pretty much everywhere (rather than just a single region) and say what you will about Waluigi, but when even people outside the core community know that there's a lot of fan demand for him, I'd argue he's in a pretty similar position now, all things considered.Has anyone considered the simple idea that we haven't got that many supposed "fan demand" characters simply because in terms of pure fan demand, there is no other character left in terms of sheer fan demand compared to and that is precisely the reason why Nintendo is largely looking outside the scope of the Smash fanbase in order to draw in new fans instead of appealing to the existing fanbases?
"Boy, that Spaceballs 2 and Kung Pow 2 double feature was great!"So, real talk, in the chance, and I emphasize chance here, that Ultimate does end on a bang... then what? Then what will you say?
I know this conversation doesn't involve me. But what is it that makes people so sure that Smash Ultimate can't possibly end with a bang?So, real talk, in the chance, and I emphasize chance here, that Ultimate does end on a bang... then what? Then what will you say?
The only real "grand finale" Smash has ever had is Bayonetta, but even then, she's a smaller IP than FF and SF and was revealed and released on the same day as Corrin.I know this conversation doesn't involve me. But what is it that makes people so sure that Smash Ultimate can't possibly end with a bang?
Nintendo is really heavily advertising Bethesda games on Switch lately.Doom Slayers collection is out now for Switch.
There was a problem fetching the tweet
It's just because Waluigi is ultimately a disposable and deriative character (based on two other already deriative characters) who has existed for 20 years now and has yet to amount to anything outside of "that one guy you play as in Mario spinoff games". And yet he has a big fanbase that thinks he's been mistreated and should be playable.I have to say, the fact that people get mad over Waluigi, a 1st party Nintendo character who's pretty popular, getting added to a 1st party Nintendo title is so confusing to me. What is it about Waluigi that makes some people so mad? It's getting to the point where you can't state clearly true things about him without people getting upset.
Ok, but where does all of this come from? Why is it necessary for Waluigi to be important to get in the game, what makes spinoffs so unimportant.It's just because Waluigi is ultimately a disposable and deriative character (based on two other already deriative characters) who has existed for 20 years now and has yet to amount to anything outside of "that one guy you play as in Mario spinoff games". And yet he has a big fanbase that thinks he's been mistreated and should be playable.
I think if Waluigi had a more major role in either Mario platformers or Wario games, or just downright had his own game series, people would look more favorably upon him.
they do this with most games. Most third party companies probably pay a big chunk for advertisement I think. It’s nothing special.Nintendo is really heavily advertising Bethesda games on Switch lately.
Doomguy confirmed
I'm looking forward to The Search for More Money."Boy, that Spaceballs 2 and Kung Pow 2 double feature was great!"
I've always found that argument strange considering that other characters like Daisy and Rosalina had their popularity significantly boosted because they're recurring in spinoffs.Ok, but where does all of this come from? Why is it necessary for Waluigi to be important to get in the game, what makes spinoffs so unimportant.
There has to be some kind of root argument here, not just "I hate this guy because he only appears in spinoffs" That's such a hilariously stupid argument to make because even appearing in the spinoffs as much as he does gives him a higher level of popularity than many of the fighters on the roster.
Apparently Daisy is a million times more important just because she appeared in Super Mario Land...for a few seconds, in a role Peach could've easily filled. The only reason why she became a fighter and Waluigi didn't is because her model could be made from editing Peach's, nothing more, nothing less.I've always found that argument strange considering that other characters like Daisy and Rosalina had their popularity significantly boosted because they're recurring in spinoffs.
Like... wasn't the reason for Daisy's Mario Tennis comeback the same as Waluigi's introduction? To serve as a doubles partner for someone else?
I don't get why people fixate this hard on arguing against Waluigi's status as "the spinoff guy" when the spinoffs lend to a lot of sales and recurring appearances.
I agree with you, there is a very high possibility that the next roster will be smaller. I'm just saying that there is still the chance that it might manage to hold on to most if not all of its characters. We just don't know yet. And yes, I know that Smash and Pokemon have already achieved juggernaut status and I hope they manage to exceed expectations, I was just pointing out that, sad as the thought may be, all franchises get stale eventually. It could takes decades, and there will always be diehard fans, but like the life of a person, there is a birth, a prime and a twilight for everything. The older I get, the more I discover the importance of cherishing the best of what you have while you have it.disney does indeed exist.
im not talking out of my ass here. Sakurai is on record saying how hard the BASE ROSTER was to put together and make happen, and they still didnt get plant done in time for the base roster. Forget the DLC entriely. These 3rd party characters are often dlc because negotiations dont always go according to plan or especially under the strict timeline of development in something like a triple A videogame. I assumed it was common knowledge particularily here on this website how diffcult this game had it to get characters back. A while back people did talk about how many characters would get cut next game id assume we'd be closer to smash 4 base roster size than brawl. but its possible smash goes smaller than 4 and does mechanical and gameplay changes maybe to make 1v1 better. they already took step in ultimate with parries and throw breaks both being added but honestly both mechanics need refinement.
you can stay behind but you said "most of what you play" not all unless you only play DLC characters or clones/semiclones you wont lose every character you like. wolf already got cut once. you can hold your money if you want as a whole smash and pokemon arent slowing anytime soon. As a whole the community mostly moves on.
Her being also very popular would easily be another reason. But yeah, the Echo factor is key regardless. If an Echo wasn't possible, she wouldn't be playable. That's something that many others don't have that option of(and in some cases, being 3rd party means licensing doesn't always work out. Hence poor Shadow isn't playable yet).Apparently Daisy is a million times more important just because she appeared in Super Mario Land...for a few seconds, in a role Peach could've easily filled. The only reason why she became a fighter and Waluigi didn't is because her model could be made from editing Peach's, nothing more, nothing less.
This is how a third pass gets funded.Gotta add a mobile game rep for gacha mechanics.
ONLY A DOLLAR to power up your attacks for a minute!
Regardless of claims of his popularity (I personally don't believe that Waluigi is on the same level as Ridley, K. Rool, or Banjo, two of whom are major antagonists in massive Nintendo flagships, and the other of which has been a popular request since as far back as the poll for MELEE, but whatever, I'll move past that now), my main issue with Waluigi is that I don't really get the need to add new Mario content?
[QUOTE ]DLC in this game need to have music, a stage, and Spirits to go along with them, at least for the Fighter Passes. Mario already has 8/88 characters (about 9%), 144/1493 Spirits (9.6% or so and this is excluding the Rabbids), 106/1057 music tracks (again, about 10%), and 18/114 stages (about 15.7%). Adding a character like Waluigi could open some avenues for a stage, sure, such as something relating to Mario Party or the like, but considering how much Mario content is already available in the game as it is, Spirits and music would have him digging for scraps. If he was listed as a Wario character, sure, but his Spirit in-game is listed under the Mario Spirits.
bro this is obviously untrue, just say you don’t like waluigiAdding a character like Waluigi could open some avenues for a stage, sure, such as something relating to Mario Party or the like, but considering how much Mario content is already available in the game as it is, Spirits and music would have him digging for scraps.
The two full cycles of Smash DLC haven’t ended on a high note? Must mean every single DLC cycle henceforth must be lame. God forbid Nintendo does anything different from before with the end of Smash DLC, like say, How they started FP1 with a bang and FP2 with a lowkey inclusion.The only real "grand finale" Smash has ever had is Bayonetta, but even then, she's a smaller IP than FF and SF and was revealed and released on the same day as Corrin.
Can someone explain
The two full cycles of Smash DLC haven’t ended on a high note? Must mean every single DLC cycle henceforth must be lame!
I don't think Daisy is really a good comparison because she's just a clone...but not only that, she's the least unique clone on the roster: she's quite literally just an extra set of costumes for Peach with literally no gameplay differences whatsoever. She took very, very little time and effort to include so that's why it's not really worth counting her and other echoes in these kinds of conversations.
And that's really the truth about Waluigi: if he could similarly be a quick easy echo fighter in the same way, he'd also be playable by now, most likely. It's just that he pretty much has to actually be a 100% unique fighter and a lot of people don't think it's really worth the effort considering his status as a character.
She isn't, but she has a few different hurtboxes. So she actually isn't 100% Peach. However, that doesn't really change that she's a lame clone in combat and there will never be a noticeable difference in practice. Your point is good. Your statement is just slightly off. Daisy would be a palette swap if she didn't have a single gameplay difference. It's not about "in practice" either. It's about whether they have any gameplay changes, no matter how ridiculously slight. Richter is also a pretty badly done one, with Dark Samus at least having electricity instead of fire(so slightly better than Richter).I don't think Daisy is really a good comparison because she's just a clone...but not only that, she's the least unique clone on the roster: she's quite literally just an extra set of costumes for Peach with literally no gameplay differences whatsoever. She took very, very little time and effort to include so that's why it's not really worth counting her and other echoes in these kinds of conversations.
And that's really the truth about Waluigi: if he could similarly be a quick easy echo fighter in the same way, he'd also be playable by now, most likely. It's just that he pretty much has to actually be a 100% unique fighter and a lot of people don't think it's really worth the effort considering his status as a character.
This. Neither Daisy or Waluigi are particularly "important" as much as they are popular recurring Mario. And we already have characters who got in for more minor reasons than "people want them", so I don't get the big deal made about Waluigi being a spin-off only character.Apparently Daisy is a million times more important just because she appeared in Super Mario Land...for a few seconds, in a role Peach could've easily filled. The only reason why she became a fighter and Waluigi didn't is because her model could be made from editing Peach's, nothing more, nothing less.