SMAASH! Puppy
Smash Legend
What I'd like to know is how different they'd be from a gameplay standpoint (in broad strokes). A lot of Kazuya's design choices seem to be made in order to emulate how Tekken works, and his playstyle is very specific. I can kind of picture what Heihachi would do since he'd likely be a semi-clone (mostly the same normals, a similar command list, but a different set of specials), but how would a different character design within the Tekken series translate over to Super Smash Bros.In Tekken 3, Jin was taught by his mother Jun, the Kazama Style Traditional Martial Arts, and when his mother went missing, he seeks his grandfather Heihachi for help. During that time, he learns the Mishima Style Fighting Karate from his grandfather, and he combined both fighting styles into his moveset. In T3, he played a lot like Kazuya but with some additional moves from his own mother's karate. At the end of T3, he got betrayed by his grandfather, and awakened his Devil Gene.
In Tekken 4, Jin decides to abandon the Mishima Style, and he learn/self taught himself some karate, in particular, the Kyokushin style of karate. Devil Jin is the only time where he goes back to the Mishima Style, and uses the Devil Gene power freely. Meaning Jin hardly ever use or incorporate the Devil Gene into his moveset. Though in Street Fighter x Tekken, Jin did use the Devil Gene as his Super Arts/Cross Arts. In the non-canon Tekken Tag series, there is a secret technique called Omen where Jin can go back to the Mishima Style if his partner was Heihachi, or in the sequel, any other Mishima family members.
The difference between Jin and Kazuya is that Jin want nothing do with his father side of the family, the Mishima and that include the power of the Devil Gene. Besides, Jin manage to defeat both his father and grandfather at the end of T4 with his new fighting style.
Here, is a fun video of Jin's Karate.
Considering that you don't have anywhere near as good of an idea of what the money is saying as Nintendo does and aren't taking into account them making a decision that may not make the most money (along with the fact that it's not an exact science), that seems unwise.It is a a good business sense & one of faith issue my fellow smasher. I follow the money which is almost always right. I don't take words into account when the money says something different.
It just sounds like you're setting yourself up to be surprised that they weren't lying about making a specific decision because you disagreed with it despite lacking perspective.