mountain_tiger
Smash Champion
Link to original post: [drupal=3484]Consumer gullibility...[/drupal]
The latest success of the iPad has led me to ask: why is it that people always feel the need to buy these things? I mean, what does an iPad do that a laptop can't? Oh whoopdee doo, so it's smaller and has a touchscreen. Touchscreens are more of a novelty than anything else IMO, since at the end of the day navigating the traditional way is no harder.
Yet whenever a new version of an iPod or iPhone is released, people always flock to buy it, even if they already own one which functions perfectly! It's a endless cycle. You pay $200 or so for an iPod, have it for about a year, a new one comes out, marketed at $300, and even though the old ones works perfectly you feel that you just HAVE to buy it. The same with mobile phones. It seems they all go obsolete within nine months.
I personally don't understand this. In the last five years I've had three mobile phones, and I only switched because the first two broke. Yet apparently all mobile phones NEED to have internet access and music storage and all that rubbish. Yet it's meant to be a PHONE. And I've had the same iPod for three years and that works fine.
But it's not just technology. To use a completely different example, take ice-cream that's sold on the beach. Around here an ice-cream costs around £1.40-£1.80. Yet go to the supermarket and you can get a pack of five for the same price! If you want ice-cream, why not take some from home in a cool bag or something? It's a LOT cheaper.
And fashion. Take Ugg boots for example. Those things aren't exactly cheap, yet loads of people (particularly girls) seem to be flocking to buy them solely because 'they're in fashion'. How many of those people actually LIKE the shoes? Obviously some will, but in a lot of cases it seems to be a case of 'I want to fit in!'
I could list more examples, but I think you get the idea. But then again, without such gullibility and desperateness to conform, a lot of firms would either go out of business, or not be doing nearly so well. It's not exactly just, but I suppose if there's a profit to be made, you can hardly blame them...
The latest success of the iPad has led me to ask: why is it that people always feel the need to buy these things? I mean, what does an iPad do that a laptop can't? Oh whoopdee doo, so it's smaller and has a touchscreen. Touchscreens are more of a novelty than anything else IMO, since at the end of the day navigating the traditional way is no harder.
Yet whenever a new version of an iPod or iPhone is released, people always flock to buy it, even if they already own one which functions perfectly! It's a endless cycle. You pay $200 or so for an iPod, have it for about a year, a new one comes out, marketed at $300, and even though the old ones works perfectly you feel that you just HAVE to buy it. The same with mobile phones. It seems they all go obsolete within nine months.
I personally don't understand this. In the last five years I've had three mobile phones, and I only switched because the first two broke. Yet apparently all mobile phones NEED to have internet access and music storage and all that rubbish. Yet it's meant to be a PHONE. And I've had the same iPod for three years and that works fine.
But it's not just technology. To use a completely different example, take ice-cream that's sold on the beach. Around here an ice-cream costs around £1.40-£1.80. Yet go to the supermarket and you can get a pack of five for the same price! If you want ice-cream, why not take some from home in a cool bag or something? It's a LOT cheaper.
And fashion. Take Ugg boots for example. Those things aren't exactly cheap, yet loads of people (particularly girls) seem to be flocking to buy them solely because 'they're in fashion'. How many of those people actually LIKE the shoes? Obviously some will, but in a lot of cases it seems to be a case of 'I want to fit in!'
I could list more examples, but I think you get the idea. But then again, without such gullibility and desperateness to conform, a lot of firms would either go out of business, or not be doing nearly so well. It's not exactly just, but I suppose if there's a profit to be made, you can hardly blame them...