Regarding the rankings discussion a couple pages back:
Using the filters is important. It's still not a perfect system (far from it tbh), but if you're going to use it to support an argument then at least pull the best data you can from it. Set a reasonable date limit (on that note, why does it track data all the way back to July for Wii U? There are evidently some pre-release entries that should probably be filtered by default), use the min value filter to weed out small/unranked events, and filter for higher placings.
For example, take Marth and Lucina since they were two of the main characters mentioned. If you filter from Nov 21 onwards, only use events worth 25 points or more (ie only using ranked events), and sort for top 16, they'll show up in the bottom 15. Filter for 50+ point events (removing small locals from the pool) and they drop to bottom 10. If you filter for top 8 they're still bottom 10 in 50+ point events, while Lucina just barely makes it out of bottom 15 in 25+ point events.
Still not great data (limited data pool, no information on representation, etc), but it certainly doesn't show them performing well. Ditto for Ganondorf, since he was also mentioned.
Shoutouts to Olimar putting in work on the rankings list though.