This is the current tier list right?
S: Meta Knight
A: Snake, Diddy Kong, Falco, Wario, Marth, Ice Climbers
B: Olimar, Pikachu, King Dedede, Mr. Game & Watch, Lucario, Zero Suit Samus
C: Toon Link, Kirby, Fox, R.O.B., Pit, Peach, Donkey Kong
D: Luigi, Wolf, (Zelda/Sheik), Sonic, Ike, Sheik, Ness, Pokémon Trainer
E: Yoshi, Lucas, Mario, Bowser
F: Captain Falcon, Samus, Jigglypuff, Link, Zelda
G: Ganondorf
-------------------------------------
When you say that tier lists only apply to high levels of play, are they referring to the current best players of each category and what their characters can do, or is it simply what the characters are capable of now? It seems that really good players are able to do magical things with their characters, despite being proclaimed low tier.
The question is, can these people overcome and eventually win a major tournament? Does being the best low tier main really matter if you can't even beat half of the cast or people that main higher tiered mains but aren't as well known? I know that skill > tiers but the question is "Where is the cut off point?" It seems that many people try with one character, find that they can't win with their character, and switch to MK instead. Now they have a new main instead of trying to work with their lower tiered main.
So why do so many players switch their mains? Is that because many people just want to win, they genuinely like playing MK, or some other orbitrary reason? And I know this just applies to singles. Once you try looking at doubles, many characters will end up switching spots. Which throws far more variables into the mix when you account for all of the character combinations which is also affected by player skill.
Examples: Certain players can do magic with considered "low tier" characters. Chu with Kirby, Anther with Pikachu, Reflex with Pokemon trainer, Boss with Luigi/Mario. Mekos with Lucas. Because of their character's flaws, is it simply impossible for them to overcome certain obstacles in tournament or is it simply much harder to do so? Does this mean that a really good player with a "bad" character cannot win a major tournament unless they extremely outplay their opponent?