Fletch
Smash Master
Just by the way you post, I will put whatever money you want to wager on Corey beating you in Melee easily.Feel free to wager on that, you'll see otherwise.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Just by the way you post, I will put whatever money you want to wager on Corey beating you in Melee easily.Feel free to wager on that, you'll see otherwise.
Uh... You DO realize that running away and camping with Pit is a very ineffective strategy against good opponents, right?I have yet to be shown anything otherwise.
I can beat 90% of my school as Roy (I main Samus), because I practice, play a lot, and know how to use him. I'm better, therefore I win.
In Brawl, I spend all my time as Pit. I can beat anyone in a FFA by camping, and, in a 1 v 1... the same thing. I spend the whole time running away and shooting. It sucks to win in Brawl, because it feels like I did nothing. If I lose in Brawl, it's because I was doing too much! The only way to beat me when I'm camping correctly, is to play Snake or Metaknight (possibly Falco... but that's a big if).
To win in Brawl, you have to play the character select screen game and have an IQ larger than your controller port. That's all.
How much do YOU want to wager?
Or at least competent Snakes that know how to Boost Smash or lob grenades.Uh... You DO realize that running away and camping with Pit is a very ineffective strategy against good opponents, right?
Yeah, good opponents would choose Snake or Metaknight.Uh... You DO realize that running away and camping with Pit is a very ineffective strategy against good opponents, right?
Not always true. I mean, Gimpyfish is an obvious example, and in other fighting games, like Guilty Gear, in the first ^C tourney, the winner was a Johnny player, who happened to be the worst character in the game(tied with Bridget and Anji).2) Yes, there are tiers, and the characters lower in these tiers are worse than the others. The characters at the absolute bottom die to everything. This is hardly an uncommon feature in fighting games, as the only way to avoid it is to have no distinct characters.
I've tried Snake but don't like him cuz your always gonna be the favorite.Well, I only decided that I enjoyed Snake the most like last week. I mained random since the game came out ^_^''
I had trouble with projectile spammers for like the first 2-3 weeks the game came out. But I got better and learned how to get around it. And I also learned how to powershield them quite easily. Pit's projectile spam isn't that hard to get around with most characters.
There are times when bottom tier characters win. Usually, though, that's because the person playing them is really good, and not because the character itself stands much of a chance.Not always true. I mean, Gimpyfish is an obvious example, and in other fighting games, like Guilty Gear, in the first ^C tourney, the winner was a Johnny player, who happened to be the worst character in the game(tied with Bridget and Anji).
No, they are fun, but still very bad compared to nearly everyone else.Before the balance of Brawl characters is further critisized, has anyone genuinely taken the time to get good at Captain Falcon or Gannondorf? Atmittedly, I have no idea what the new potentials for these characters are, because I never bothered to try getting past their nerfs. For all I know, they could be terribly underestimated because of the large number of their disapointed fans who never bothered to learn their new set-up. I have yet to see an objective opinion of these characters on one of these non-character specific forums.
*******.From some old post on AiB:
Credit to CubaIsDeath for the video.
I saw this and I think it pretty much sucks, as in I'm dissapointed that it exists.
http://www.allisbrawl.com/video/video.aspx?id=1041
but at least Ness can do it. woohoo...
From the youtube description:
Mario: Jab
Dk: Jab
Metaknight: Jab and Dtilt
Marth: Jab (but only a certain part of the hitbox)
Samus: Jab
Kirby: Jab
Ness: Jab
Squirtle: Jab, Double Jab, and Ftilt
Link: Jab
Yoshi: Jab
Sonic: Jab
R.O.B.: Dtilt
Wolf: Nair
King Dedede: Jab (very hard to do)
False, false, false.I feel that brawl is more balanced. All the characters (including their abilities) are the same to me. I see barley any difference in their usefulness in a match. Each one has its good parts and its faults and an aspect that makes it unique. You could main anyone and still be the best. Melee seemed highly unbalanced as Fox and Falco were 10 times better than any character and any n00b could win a match using them. Their techniques and movements were unmatched in that game, and most people mained them. Now to me they seem weaker in brawl, which definitely makes it more balanced.
I don't know if this makes me biased or not but I generally main lower tier characters like IC.
I main Ganondorf in Brawl. Melee is more balanced.Before the balance of Brawl characters is further critisized, has anyone genuinely taken the time to get good at Captain Falcon or Gannondorf? Atmittedly, I have no idea what the new potentials for these characters are, because I never bothered to try getting past their nerfs. For all I know, they could be terribly underestimated because of the large number of their disapointed fans who never bothered to learn their new set-up. I have yet to see an objective opinion of these characters on one of these non-character specific forums.
Again, Ness hater + ***.Ness is still in bottom; I'm not sure where you got that.
The metagame changed so slowly mainly because there weren't a good deal of competitive players finding all the nuances of the game. From SmashWiki:
Currently we've got tournaments with populations of over 40, held nearly every week, in several different parts of the country. The development of the metagame is, to say the least, far faster than what you'd've seen for Melee's early years.
You can see the shifting around of top 5 as AMAZING CHANGES TO METAGAME, but all I see it as is people discovering the best five characters in the game as early as 2002, and people continuing to view those characters as the best for the remaining lifetime of Melee.
You're trolling my posts and I have no idea who you are, but I'd appreciate some reasoning behind what you're trying to say - that Ness isn't a mediocre or worse character.Again, Ness hater + ***.
Your pissing me off.
Another ******.I feel that brawl is more balanced. All the characters (including their abilities) are the same to me. I see barley any difference in their usefulness in a match. Each one has its good parts and its faults and an aspect that makes it unique. You could main anyone and still be the best. Melee seemed highly unbalanced as Fox and Falco were 10 times better than any character and any n00b could win a match using them. Their techniques and movements were unmatched in that game, and most people mained them. Now to me they seem weaker in brawl, which definitely makes it more balanced.
I don't know if this makes me biased or not but I generally main lower tier characters like IC.
AZ Power RankingsAww come on school match's don't count I could beat most of my school with my feet. If my friends were not playing>.> We had one teacher that was pretty awesome with samus.
lol you clearly need to play more brawl if:I have yet to be shown anything otherwise.
I can beat 90% of my school as Roy (I main Samus), because I practice, play a lot, and know how to use him. I'm better, therefore I win.
In Brawl, I spend all my time as Pit. I can beat anyone in a FFA by camping, and, in a 1 v 1... the same thing. I spend the whole time running away and shooting. It sucks to win in Brawl, because it feels like I did nothing. If I lose in Brawl, it's because I was doing too much! The only way to beat me when I'm camping correctly, is to play Snake or Metaknight (possibly Falco... but that's a big if).
To win in Brawl, you have to play the character select screen game and have an IQ larger than your controller port. That's all.
How much do YOU want to wager?
I'm sorry, but I really don't see this. In Melee, it was probably possible for Fox, Falco, Sheik, Marth, Peach, Falcon, ICs, Samus, or Jiggles to win a pretty decent sized tournament, and even this early in the game with Brawl (where more characters should be getting more playing time), we are already seeing a scene completely dominated by 2 characters, with very few exceptions. The other characters might be closer to each other in terms of ability, but MK and Snake trump most of them way more than the top tiers in Melee did.what makes brawl fun is the amount of viable characters (which is more than melee). there's still a small top tier, but on any given day a random mid tier has a higher chance of winning at a brawl tournament than a melee tournament.
The difference between the low and high tier characters in melee was much higher than those in Brawl. How can you compare fox to Mewtwo? They are just too different. Brawl on the other hand has no huge skill difference like that. You can be good with anyone if you practice and there is no worst character.False, false, false.
Fox was only 10 times better than any other character if you were playing a noob 10 times worse than you.
Just because they weakened the stronger characters from Melee ---> Brawl does not automatically make it more balanced, especially if they throw in a character that is top tier even at mid level play, such as Snake and Metaknight.
And calling Ice Climbres low tier? Yeah you have no right to talk about balance. Lrn2ply.
How can you compare Meta Knight to Captain Falcon?How can you compare fox to Mewtwo?
Metaknight is good, but captain falcon is good too. Do you honestly think captain falcon is that bad? Also, MK would not be my first choice for a top tier character, but that is just opinionatedHow can you compare Meta Knight to Captain Falcon?
*Facepalm*The difference between the low and high tier characters in melee was much higher than those in Brawl. How can you compare fox to Mewtwo? They are just too different. Brawl on the other hand has no huge skill difference like that. You can be good with anyone if you practice and there is no worst character.
P.S. Ok fine IC is MIDDLE/UPPER tier, but I also play a lot of Link Kirby and G&W. Also, I can't seem to see why Snake is in the top tier. Metaknight I can understand but Snake...I don't know.
So that person was trying to do the same move over and over again. Anyone can ply a character badly then post it on youtube.Can you actually say with a straight face that Captain Falcon is good?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Reubh68wwIc
Of course there are some characters that are better than others! There are just less completely horrible characters in brawl than in melee. Also what facts do you have against brawl being more balanced?*Facepalm*
Another scrub argument containing the "Every character is good, you just have to know how to use them" arguement. When will people realize that it could apply to ANYONE and it's a terrible arguement? Some characters are inheritly better than others, even Sakurai himself admitted that in certain situation in where he HAD to win, he would choose a certain few characters. Doesn't that imply to you that this game is not balanced?
You know a game is not balanced when the CREATOR of the game says something along the lines of that, not to mention the other truckloads of facts against Brawl being more balanced than Melee against almost no proof Brawl>Melee supporters bring to the table.