• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Ban brinstar and rainbow cruise

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
YEAH, they're unfair for SOME characters, comparatively speaking. And that makes a lot of people feel the need to pick up fox, falco, or jiggs to keep up... it's just stupid if you ask me, one step closer to fox only rainbow cruise only, which is obviously an extreme but it's just stupid.

What is dumber? all neutral stages or all spacies and jiggs players?
they are both equally dumb. (even though 1 basically happens as we speak)

whats the difference between a character making you pick up another character or a stage making you pick up another character?

do you value characters over stages?
 

KirbyKaze

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
17,679
Location
Spiral Mountain
We clearly value characters more than stages.

A bunch of the banned ones are probably banned primarily because Foxxy Love is too good on them.

But we didn't get rid of Foxxy Love :D
 

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
We clearly value characters more than stages.

A bunch of the banned ones are probably banned primarily because Foxxy Love is too good on them.

But we didn't get rid of Foxxy Love :D
so if the game centralized around fox before. why would people not ban him instead of limit his options.

limiting a character is admitting it is broken and needs to be put on the same level as everyone else
 

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
dont pick up another character. just take them to your counterpick. thats how it goes.
sheik vs. low tiers.

do I have a CP? yes. does it matter? no.

sheik makes me pick up another character in the same way that a stage makes me pick up another character.
 

Nø Ca$h

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
2,726
Location
Philadelphia PA
sheik vs. low tiers.

do I have a CP? yes. does it matter? no.

sheik makes me pick up another character in the same way that a stage makes me pick up another character.
i dont understand.

sheik vs most low tiers is 80-20 or worse. i understand picking a secondary for that.

but one stage (that you CAN ban) is only one match of a disadvantage. not the set. and if you lose u gain advantages with your CP.
 

Nø Ca$h

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
2,726
Location
Philadelphia PA
you can get a sheik in brackets but you cant get a stage.

btw im pro ban for RC, spacies already have enough CPs.

but i want brinstar legal because spacies lose there

edit: you can see hax is biased how in the OP he only wants RC and brinstar banned but not KJ64.. lol.
 

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
you can get a sheik in brackets but you cant get a stage.

btw im pro ban for RC, spacies already have enough CPs.

but i want brinstar legal because spacies lose there

edit: you can see hax is biased how in the OP he only wants RC and brinstar banned but not KJ64.. lol.

you don't ban a stage just because a character is good on a lot of stages already. that directly impacts everyone else
 

Kanelol

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
1,840
Location
Ohio yeeeee
I thought tournament stage bans were more objective, and that TOs could just intelligently look at a certain stage and determine whether or not it's good for tourney play without considering which characters are good or not on the aforementioned stage

i may be wrong though
 

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
I thought tournament stage bans were more objective, and that TOs could just intelligently look at a certain stage and determine whether or not it's good for tourney play without considering which characters are good or not on the aforementioned stage

i may be wrong though
its a partial catch 22. you need to know what characters can do in order to ban a stage but in order to ban a character you need to know what stages are in the game (that are perfectly fine)
 

Wobbles

Desert ******
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
2,881
Location
Gilbert, AZ
We don't need to re-legalize Hyrule because it was demonstrated pretty soundly that:

--even if people don't run, matches take forever, which hinders the running of the tournament.
--if a character who is faster than you decides to run, you cannot catch them.

So either you have a timer, and you get a metagame of "one hit = win for the faster character," or you have no timer which turns into "camp relentlessly if you are behind at all and force the winner to approach from a disadvantage if he wants to win ever."i
 

Stev

Smash Ace
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
810
Location
Cal Poly / Davis, CA
its a partial catch 22. you need to know what characters can do in order to ban a stage but in order to ban a character you need to know what stages are in the game (that are perfectly fine)
More like you have two variables that are dependent on each other. Just make an assumption for one, and iterate until the answer comes out correct. Couldn't be more simple.
 

Fortress | Sveet

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
16,256
Location
Northern IL
Btw how come Ken dominated the game for years even though sticking to Marth, who was supposed to "get screwed over" during a more open stagelist (including Onett and Corneria(where I've seen matches uploaded where he'd play marth and not fox.
Well for one, Ken also had one of the best foxes in the world as well as his marth. Second, it was almost an unspoken rule in the MLG days to just stick to the neutrals. I don't think there was a single non-neutral stage at MLG vegas.
 

KirbyKaze

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
17,679
Location
Spiral Mountain
I think you should note your 11 inch dong whenever you make a post so you make it with more authority.

BRINSTAR SHOULD BE BANNED.

MY **** IS ****ING GIGANTIC.

LISTEN AND OBEY THE MASSIVE DONG.
 

-ACE-

Gotem City Vigilante
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
11,536
Location
The back country, GA
you don't ban a stage just because a character is good on a lot of stages already. that directly impacts everyone else
So the best character in the game gets slightly nerfed, and you phrase it as "that directly impacts everyone else". Quite a play on words if you ask me. Fox, Falco, and even jiggs do just fine on FD, and if you've read the papers lately, they aren't bad with platforms either.
 

CryBay-B

Smash Rookie
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
16
Location
Illinois
RC is a legit stage, i have seen a reason that universally makes RC bad for most characters.

If you wanna ban janky stages, DL and the blowjob tree need to go, you literally get pushed back and forth by the wind, causing unintentional movement from your character but if you cant adapt to moving stages and lava, then your SOL, you might as well quit!

When it comes down to it, skill is about taking what you kno, and applying it to what is presented before you. you see a falco and FD, and your playing CF, DEAL W/ IT AND FIGURE OUT A WAY TO WIN! or ragequit and flame about how janky that one stage is on the smashboards, and fear that match-up.

Dont ***** about it, practice or die
 

CryBay-B

Smash Rookie
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
16
Location
Illinois
I know, i was just trying to show that some stages have elements that people need to work around, i love all the stages EXCEPT FD! FD = **** DIS
 

Hax

Smash Champion
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
2,552
Location
20XX
Wobbles said:
Here's your problem Hax. You are saying that the lava, because it can damage players at ALL and influence the match in ANY WAY, is *bad*. I'm saying that because you can plan around it and because you can see it coming, it is a resource that both players have access to. Not to the same extent because characters take advantage of it in different ways, but you can say the same about other stage characteristics.
please don't put words in my mouth; "influence the match in any way" is a ridiculously skewed interpretation of the point i'm making here. as pointed out in my last post (which you failed to refute), you took 80% for being needled (and should have lost your stock). this is a bit different from "skewing the match in any way;" this is a serious problem. the way you act as if all characters can capitalize equally on an opponent hit by lava is equally pathetic; jigglypuff hitting down b for a stock is a bit different from samus nairing for 12% (her best aerial punish)

Wobbles said:
Lava saving people and getting them killed... well, we can make nearly identical arguments regarding Randall on YS, if you want. Should have died, shouldn't have, gets you killed because you didn't see it coming and do some random thing that screws you over. In fact, lots of people have complained about Randall to the point of saying YS shouldn't be neutral. Even when I pointed out he's on a strict timer and it doesn't take much practice to learn to check the clock at important times, many people say you "shouldn't have to look at the clock," or "you can't be expected to do that." That doesn't even take into account hitbox stalling on Shy Guys that can ruin recoveries--or randomly help them-- or deadweighting on them from throws that changes combos. At least you can see the lava rising in the background of Brinstar. Not paying attention to that is the same as not paying attention to the level shifting on PS and not knowing that the platforms, when sunk into the level, don't entirely disappear immediately, creating weird little partitions in the stage.
Wobbles, do you know what outweighing an argument means? I don't think you do. you are attempting to justify Brinstar's lava by comparing it to Randall, who at worst forces the edgeguarder to ledgehop bair. the Shy Guys are even less significant; i cannot think of a single match where they have changed the outcome.

your logic needs to go from "if two stages each possess an abnormal stage characteristic, they are equally fair" to "certain stage characteristics affect gameplay more than others."

inb4 "DL64's wind can affect the outcome of a match"

Wobbles said:
I know how you'll respond to this: "you can't seriously be comparing NEUTRAL STAGES to the LAVA on BRINSTAR." Well, they share similar characteristics, don't they? They may not be as prominent but tell me Randall hasn't influenced the outcome of matches on YS, or you haven't been ****ed over by a platform on PS or FoD by being caught at the wrong spot in its transformation. Or if you want an example from another counterpick that you haven't talked about banning, DK64's barrel, which IS completely random and is, more often than not, off screen until the last moment, making it nearly impossible to plan around unless you're Peach or Puff. And while it can save you, you can also try and hit the other guy when he pops out. Kinda like lava! Doesn't hurt you though, except when it spits you at the bottom of the screen.
first part was responded to above; about KJ64 I have said that i'm iffy about it. as for its barrel: please stop comparing minor hazards to lava; unlike lava, KJ64's barrel takes up approximately 1/20th of the horizontal width of KJ64 at a time. and nearly all of the time someone's edgeguard is ruined because of it, they still end up getting the kill because of the free punish they have.

the barrel spitting you out at the bottom of the screen is a prime example of a characteristic you can play around. unless waiting for it to face upwards is too difficult; or perhaps not being stupid enough to mash buttons when you're in the barrel's vicinity.

i'd appreciate it if you could leave KJ64 aside for now. we should focus on one stage at once.

Wobbles said:
As for my Rayku match…
i'll get to the list of times at which Brinstar interfered with the match in a second; I just wanted to point out that you conceded 3 of these points, one of them being that you took 80% and should have lost your stock for being needled into the lava.

don't worry; i'm sure macsmasher89 still thinks you're ****** the thread

Wobbles said:
6:10: you can see the lava rising in the background as early as 6:05. Rayku screwed up, much in the same way I do near the end.

6:28: So?

8:00: He made a mistake and got killed for it. What's the problem here?

8:20: I was too absorbed in my CG to see the lava coming. If I'd abandoned it I could have played off the lava to combo instead, maybe into something on the top middle platform where I could have finished a handoff uninterrupted.

8:36: Don't know what you're talking about, I should have gone for a grab for a charged smash finish rather than a d-smash. I panicked because victory was so close and didn't think about the membrane delaying my hitbox or the slopes changing my speed.

I deserved that loss, and it's all stuff that I should have been watching for.
6:10 are you admitting that the lava is a significant hazard that must be avoided whenever it rises? the only strategy that could have been employed is scrambling up to the top platform, at which point the game becomes a dsmash-fest; first dsmash takes a stock. the type of fighting that occurs when both players are fighting for control of a 4 foot wide platform is among the most degenerate things in the game.

6:28 Rayku did what was necessary to kill your Nana on any other stage; he deserved the kill. while she DI'd like a ret*rd and still died, this gave you the opportunity to side-b/up-b to save her which is unfair. how are you just going to brush this off?

8:00 the problem is that if he DIDN'T DI the lava horribly (into your bair), he would have survived a smash that would have killed him on any other level.

8:20 there is nothing in the game that you could have done to still get the kill because of the lava. he was at 20% and you needed the grab infinite to kill him. what are you talking about…

8:36 that's great that if you did something differently you would have had the kill; you wouldn't have HAD to do anything differently on any other stage to get the kill. this is among numerous times Brinstar's walls have skewed a match because they halt a player from moving. whenever I get a fox/falco stuck in-between them, I usually repeatedly dair -> knee for a stock because they're unable to tech left/right away from the walls. in addition, it's virtually impossible to tell whether there are walls or not. it is based on how many particles have been broken, and I do not think it is fair to force players to count how many particles are left in the middle of a match.

Wobbles said:
But here's where you chip in and say I "shouldn't" have to watch for that stuff because I don't have to on other levels. And that's where I say "yes I do." I have to take into account random properties of the other stages ALL THE TIME. If you want to play the should and shouldn't game, how about we do this?

I SHOULDN'T have to space my forward+b more precisely with Fox and Falco to avoid going under Battlefield, when that doesn't happen on other neutrals. Why should I have to pay attention to that?

You SHOULDN'T get the benefit of FD's sloped side while recovering, because it artificially alters recovery distance on up+b moves and can make you recover when you should have died.

I SHOULDN'T need to know that there's a high tendency for stage hits to send you straight down when you hit certain parts of the wall on Yoshi's Story. It's a flat wall, why should it do that? It's quite clearly ********.

I also shouldn't know that Randall spends exactly 5 seconds inside the stage, 5 seconds outside of it, and that if you try doing certain ledge actions while he's next to you he can screw you up. That is also stupid.

I shouldn't have to know that the right side of PS's rock transformation doesn't let you roll very far onto the level, just as I shouldn't have to know that there's a slope near the tree during the fire phase that can screw up short hops. And why should I know that the grassy platform gives you an autofastfall when you run off it? That's dumb.

Look at all the random unintuitive **** you have to learn in order to play on our neutral stages. I'm pretty sure the only reason people don't think about that stuff is because... well, they don't think about it! They know it already! You know the ins and outs of those levels because you play on them constantly. You're used to paying attention to dumb **** on those stages and when you forget, either you admit that you screwed up or the people around you laugh at you.

But I guess we shouldn't have to learn ANOTHER level, right? That's just too much work for us hardcore tournament players.
seriously, do you know what outweighing means?
 

Brookman

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
6,202
Location
pikachu
this is a serious problem. the way you act as if all characters can capitalize equally on an opponent hit by lava is equally pathetic; jigglypuff hitting down b for a stock is a bit different from samus nairing for 12% (her best aerial punish)
I'd say her charge shot (if you can maintain it) would be her best option to punish in the situation





All kidding aside, you don't make a great point here, seeing as samus is nonviable as a tournament selection.
 

CableCho57

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
1,656
Location
Goleta/Santa Barbara, CA
lol randal cant setup kills like the silly lava can

for reals though brinstar needs to go.

but rainbow can stay. Like ive said melee needs that one gnarly stage. And the way the stages moves is a set order
 

DanteFox

Smash Champion
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
2,628
Location
Santa Barbara, California
ya'll are a bunch of babies and should be ashamed! Hax especially! You ******s won't be content until our stage list is diminished to only neutrals will you?!

edit: oh wow the word wa.nkers is censored? LOL
 

CableCho57

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
1,656
Location
Goleta/Santa Barbara, CA
to get back on topic

pokefloats isnt as good as RC because there arent as many moments of flat areas to play on. RC has more than one and the stage moves at a steady pace. In pokefloats, there are many instances where the stage changes to quickly. Not to mention rainbow cruise is wider
 
Top Bottom