Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I know he is okay with Vocal dying, but he seemed more hesitant on him shooting, and I just don't know what that means. Really it's only important if Vocal flips scum and I die toNight, if I'm still around toMorrow I'll look into it myself, not necessarily change my stance. He's been playing really town so I feel comfortable with my read right now, just dont want to get too comfortable like I did in Celeb mafia.July, why would you reconsider your town read on Gheb if Vocal flipped scum?
Huh? Vocal shooting or being shot has been perfectly fine with me all Day. Pretty sure I was one of the first to even mention him as a suspect toDay. I have no idea where you're coming from.I know he is okay with Vocal dying, but he seemed more hesitant on him shooting, and I just don't know what that means.
Wow sweeping, ENTIRELY FALSE statements like this make me wanna hit my head into a wall. If you make such an outrageous claim with no attempt to back it up I'm simply going to ignore you in the future.Gheb also says that the Kuz vs Swords conflict was a very good one.
Really ******** tunneling @ kuz makes me think dumb or opportunistic scum. Not a main suspect but he should be the one to shoot on one of the next Days imo.Gheb, what is your read on Sword
I did see that Gheb has been giving us way too many options. "Sure you can shoot, shoot who you want" A good point, we should stand up for who we want to shoot, but he is encouraging us a little too much. He tells me he would only trust himself to shoot, but why would he be willing to tell others to shoot who they think might be scum?
EBWOP: "He tells me he would only trust himself to shoot, but why would he be willing to tell others to shoot who they think might be scum, if he only trusted himself?"
Seriously Ran, that's not hard to understand and you should SERIOUSLY be able to figure out stuff like this yourself. Questioning things is fine but just asking to get the whole game and every possible train of thought spoonfed to you makes you a huge distraction. I'm saying that if a player has the ability to shoot then he shouldn't make himself a tool or hide behind the opinion of the town and shoot whom he considers scum. You on the other hand, make it look like I've implied that any player can be shot, including town reads. Obviously I'm not telling players to do that but this is so blatantly obvious that it HURTS me to even have to mention it to you. Use a little common sense, please.Obviously Gheb's fine with them shooting as long as they shoot whoever he would shoot; it's only logical. Plus he clears the shooter that way.
Sephiroths Masamune will be prodded if he does not post by 6PM this evening (GMT)Mod Prod on Seph please
Unless stated otherwise, players should assume that a modkill is not imminent@mod how many prods are the mentioned players away from a modkill?
Btw definitely agree that a player should be shoot if they are about to be modkilled.@mod how many prods are the mentioned players away from a modkill?
Modkill would be really stupid because it prevents us from "clearing" players via shooting. If somebody is close to be modkilled we might as well just shoot that player. Agreed?
It's a deal if we are both town and live to the point, I threw that idea out there now in case I get nk'ed and town gets stuck, we still have many scummies to go before I would start seriously considering Gheb.I can partly see your reasoning, I guess. Earlier I actually had the idea that Gheb should be looked into more upon a townVocal flip due to his suggestion of either me or him shooting the other. If it turns out that we're both town we should definitely keep on our toes with him, could be scum directing miskills.
I thought you wanted Seph to shoot toDay more than Vocal at first, but I re-read that and I think you were saying you would prefer Seph as a shooter only if Clown was the target, but then you were looking into Clown more as a scum suspect so I got confused between how you wanted Seph/Vocal/Clown to work out.Huh? Vocal shooting or being shot has been perfectly fine with me all Day. Pretty sure I was one of the first to even mention him as a suspect toDay. I have no idea where you're coming from.
Then I'm curious on what your understanding of opportunistic is because you just described your own play as a textbook example of opportunism.Gheb, if tunneling someone who is mostly an unpopular choice for being shoot toDay is what it means to be "opportunistic," then the meaning of opportunistic has changed vastly from my understanding.
It's a bit mucky because of Vocal vs Clown being a major part of toDay's focus while Seph is being inactive. Really hard to evaluate how scummy each of the players actually is. Essentially I'm down for any of these three people shooting / being shot.I thought you wanted Seph to shoot toDay more than Vocal at first, but I re-read that and I think you were saying you would prefer Seph as a shooter only if Clown was the target, but then you were looking into Clown more as a scum suspect so I got confused between how you wanted Seph/Vocal/Clown to work out.
Wouldn't answering this question give mafia a better idea of who town wants to keep around and thus who they should target? If I say that I want him in endgame then they will likely try to pick him off before then; if I say the opposite then they'll probably leave him for that very purpose.Didn't think I could get a prod during v/la :o
Ranmaru, why aren't you answering the things I asked about Delvro way back? Stop ignoring it, I want answers.
I'm okay with Vocal shooting Ranmaru/Luxor/Clownbot. This is subject to change pending Ran's next post. I didn't like July before he was cleared.
Luxor, Clownbot, kuz and Vocal: How do you feel about Ran making it to endgame?
@X1, I'm probably going to get busier and busier with uni, if you want a more active playslot, feel free to replace me out.
Sorry, I missed you posting V/LADidn't think I could get a prod during v/la :o
It also looks like a weak justification to get rid of somebody whom he doesn't have an explicitly stated scum read on under the pretext of doing town a "favor" with it.Wouldn't answering this question give mafia a better idea of who town wants to keep around and thus who they should target? If I say that I want him in endgame then they will likely try to pick him off before then; if I say the opposite then they'll probably leave him for that very purpose.
¿Qué ?Then I'm curious on what your understanding of opportunistic is because you just described your own play as a textbook example of opportunism.
---especially since you're not willing to convince town of any other ideas.
Ranmaru - should totally die regardless, but probably town@BSL: Please give an actual scum list. If BSL is the only person on your scum list, give reason why he is scum, not annoying. Bonus points for including a town and null list as well.
It's probably not. Did someone say it was?Skimming hard, but Sworddancer's attack on Kuz doesn't read S v S to me.
How was my statement false? It relates to this. If I was wrong, please explain how I misunderstood you here.Wow sweeping, ENTIRELY FALSE statements like this make me wanna hit my head into a wall. If you make such an outrageous claim with no attempt to back it up I'm simply going to ignore you in the future.
Stuff like the recent Sword / kuz exchange is exactly the kind of talk mafia benefits the most from. While you bash each other's heads with dumb threads they just get their chance to sneak out of the spotlight.
And if anybody seriously shoots kuz it has to be at least a scummy player aka Seph, Vocal or Clown. But I'd like any of them dead way before kuz.
Ranmaru said:Gheb also says that the Kuz vs Swords conflict was a very good one.