That was actually pretty funny.
Still down with an air lynch at this point.
Still down with an air lynch at this point.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Because I knew someone like you would jump on such an obvious WIFOM remark like Mario to a Goomba.Thanks for the pile of WIFOM for us to worry about now. Why would you even say such a thing.
nope. just got finish reading Phoenix Wright Mafia so i'll read this tomorrow. only thing i remember is Susa and Xiivi acting pretty silly in the beginning. i'll explain more when i catch upSo Omni did you read the game yet up to the point where you made Post 438?
(meaning had you read the game yet when you made that post not did you read up to that yet)
Whatever doubts I had are moot because he is a doublevoter. Upon further consideration, it would be extremely unbalanced for Mafia to have that ability.@Marc: Your last content post mentioned you still having doubts of Chibo. After your reread, do you still have doubts? If so, what are they?
While in the Epic Mafia link that Tom posted, double voting was given to a side-changing indie. However, mafia scum has this to say: http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Doublevoter giving the role a pro-town slant. I'd be will to say wait on him for investigations tonight to turn up anything. Also, with SuSa gone, I think we should let Omni post a bit before saying he should be lynched.McFox: True, but if Chibo's either town or independent I'd rather go with someone who can actually be scum. Someone like SuSa who's is either very newbish or very scum would be a better choice IMO.
Kevin, learn to ****ing read. I would RATHER we investigate Chibo before pushing a lynch since he's rather ambiguous in his usefulness. In other words, I DON'T WANT TO BOTHER WASTING THE TIME UNTIL DEADLINE FIGURING OUT IF CHIBO IS TOWN OR INDIE. That's what I was responding to.I'd be will to say wait on him for investigations tonight to turn up anything.
This part was a little off to me but I might be overthinking. Since Tom established that the doublevoter could be an indie as well as town, you're slipping this statement in there a little too unnaturally imo.Bottom line, this is a crazy important town role, one of the most important imo, so my first reaction was that I need to protect myself as long as possible.
I can understand this... it was a genuine post that you probably regret. I'm interested to see how the nightkills play out though. They could be very telling.As for drawing attention to myself, I honestly didn't mean to. Does everyone realize that the 6 votes I got (and what might have potentially seemed to be a soon coming hammer) was all from the stupid little post I made saying like "aw, I'm not mafia anymore?"
I would RATHER we investigate Chibo before pushing a lynch since he's rather ambiguous in his usefulness.
I think Air is being too vague. His posts sort of drift in the clouds. There's no substance. It's weird Air how you accuse others of having bad reasons for voting you when you voted on me "just because..."And I don't really have any other major suspicions aside from Kataefi.
I don't really know what to say since everything has pretty much been said by the more experienced players.
My last post assumed that if a majority lynch wasn't reached by deadline, then the player with the highest number of votes would be lynched. Rereading things, I found out this isn't the case and we have approximately ~48 hours~ to reach a decision (on the weekend nonetheless, where players are notable for being inactive...). No Lynch on Day 1 is really, really bad. I will go ahead and Vote Deadline Extention, however I have a feeling Steel won't give one since he imposed it on us in the first place. :/5. If a majority of votes has not been reached at deadline, it will force a ‘no lynch.’
I'm dropping the question since it operated under the assumption that no majority = highest vote lynch.I don't understand why we wouldn't use it...
Can you please explain further.
So you never had any real explanation for your vote in the first place other than referencing the pages beforehand, and quickly remove it now that you've been reminded of it with no opinions on anything else?Nope, I'm not really suspicious of anyone yet at this point. As for my vote, I forgot to take it off earlier.
unvote.
This really just trivializes the events that have occurred in the game thus far in an effort to avoid commenting on anything. You mention it being difficult to get tells, but at the end of the post, you give some lynch candidates without reasoning. Surely you felt you had some tells on them?chibo wtf you don't joke about being mafia. that's definitely not the same as my wifom claim.
uhm, what do you guys want me to say? this **** is crazy. it's hard to get tells when a fraction of the plays are just bad, a fraction are people who parrot, a fraction of people who are town but suck at scumhunting, etc. the range of experience levels are high which makes this really damn annoying since im constantly determining if something is dumb or scum.
anyway, i'm down for lynching marc, air, or hilt.
It's generally Marc's playstyle to wreak of ambiguity...and you mention that your suspicion is partially due to his playstyle. Really, you accuse Marc of playing the way he always plays and vote him for it. This feels like psuedo-scumhunting to me. Your defense of SuSa makes the assumption that he is able to daytalk with someone who is able to coach him. Early in the game we discussed that we don't know if this is true or not (in fact Marc pointed it out against CK [I don't feel Marc has been "parroting parrots" in this game as you seem to believe by the way.]), so using "he would have been coached" as a defense is subpar. Also remember the beginning fiasco occurred in a very short time period, before a large portion of players had checked in.I just disliked your play early and midgame. It's partially due to your play style but you don't like to get your shoes dirty. Your first post into the game (#112) was so unhelpful and you were parroting parrots. Basically, I've noticed you attempt to stay very neutral throughout the game and only stating obvious deductions unlike players like Tom and CK who seem to actively scumhunt.
Surprised that you now want to go after Susa. It seems obvious that the dude was just anxious to play Mafia but just really sucked at playing. No way I'd let my scum buddy make an ass out of himself for 4 pages without regulating his posts and/or helping him make wiser decisions.
vote: Marc
But yeah, that's why. You wreak of ambiguity.
The thing is, air is playing differently than his play in Grammys Mafia. Throughout all of day 1, he didn't throw down a vote, and attempted to ride the tides of the BK lynch on Day 2 in Grammys. However in this game, he has voiced an opinion, placed a vote, and stuck to his opinion. He doesn't come off as wishy-washy as he did in Grammys.
The problem I have with voting you is that you were like this in Grammy's Mafia... and you were mafia along with me. If you were mafia again I'd be certain you would mix it up a little to avoid building up suspicion.
This comes off as very town to me. The association that asking for a modkill might be scummy is reaching, but it comes off as a townie unfamiliar with modkills rather than scum attempting to grasp for straws as CK classified it as.Does anyone else find this a slightly scummy? Yeah he's inactive lately, but having him modkilled and lynching someone else seems pretty scummy to say. Besides replacing him, modkilling and lynching someone else doesn't seem to help town at all. /=
To me anyways.
I don't feel that way about Air in this game at all. He actually has made up an effort to bring new things to the table, unlike, say, BK.@Air: Because most of your posts are driven by thoughts made by others and not your own. When you were asked a question, the majority of your responses were just ideas taken from other people in a form of agreeing. When you initiated your own post (rare), you normally parrot and echo from other players.
The reason why you weren't my at the top was because your play style conflicts with scummy behavior. It's hard to determine with you.
The first sentence discusses the possibility of an independent DV. The second sentence saying you wish to wait for investigation to turn up anything. It is very easy to read that as "Chibo's PR is ambiguous. We should wait for an investigative report tonight to decide what it really is." So yes, this does come off as power role direction.While in the Epic Mafia link that Tom posted, double voting was given to a side-changing indie. However, mafia scum has this to say: http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Doublevoter giving the role a pro-town slant. I'd be will to say wait on him for investigations tonight to turn up anything. Also, with SuSa gone, I think we should let Omni post a bit before saying he should be lynched.
You never had to mention investigative reports to get the point across that "We shouldn't waste time discussing Chibo's alignment in terms of his power role." The second part of your defense comes off as major deflection.Kevin, learn to ****ing read. I would RATHER we investigate Chibo before pushing a lynch since he's rather ambiguous in his usefulness. In other words, I DON'T WANT TO BOTHER WASTING THE TIME UNTIL DEADLINE FIGURING OUT IF CHIBO IS TOWN OR INDIE. That's what I was responding to.
Your grabbing at straws as much as Airgemini now. I'd almost start calling you a lyncher because nearly every post has been directed at me and how supposedly suspicious I am, when he's just twisting what is there to sound suspicious.
.... What? Have you not seen me posting my opinions on Kataefi at all? What page of this thread are you on?@Air: Because most of your posts are driven by thoughts made by others and not your own. When you were asked a question, the majority of your responses were just ideas taken from other people in a form of agreeing. When you initiated your own post (rare), you normally parrot and echo from other players.
If you are going to keep your vote on Kataefi, then please lay out your case for us again, and explain how you feel about Kat's more recent posts.My last post assumed that if a majority lynch wasn't reached by deadline, then the player with the highest number of votes would be lynched. Rereading things, I found out this isn't the case and we have approximately ~48 hours~ to reach a decision (on the weekend nonetheless, where players are notable for being inactive...). No Lynch on Day 1 is really, really bad. I will go ahead and Vote Deadline Extention, however I have a feeling Steel won't give one since he imposed it on us in the first place. :/
Those not voting should really consider making their votes and their reasoning, and should probably be commenting on the current lynch candidates regardless of if they support that lynch or not. A bunch of spread out votes = no lynch = town doesn't use it's best weapon.
It sounds really bad, I know, but I just have a really strong feeling about him being mafia. Like, more than anyone else. His playstyle to me seems way too similar to Grammy mafia. I'm not saying you all have to agree with me, but I just really believe he's mafia.If you are going to keep your vote on Kataefi, then please lay out your case for us again,
His most recent post seems a little too 'big' for me. I can't help but think someone's helping him.and explain how you feel about Kat's more recent posts.
After Kat, I'd go with Chibo because of his "important power" claim.Also, if we near deadline and your push for a Kat lynch continues to go nowhere, what other lynches do you support/oppose at this point?