trev94
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2008
- Messages
- 425
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa noTake that! R.O.B. haters! R.O.B. deserves to be in!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa noTake that! R.O.B. haters! R.O.B. deserves to be in!
No no, I wasnt flaming you. Man, Im definitly not a flamer.Wow what's your problem. All I did was state my opinion and you flame me for everything I said lol. I'm not gonna answer all those questions coz I can't be bothered getting into a flame war All characters have reasons to be in brawl I was just saying who I thought was the weakest...
Joke character? Not really. He was put in their to promote GSC. That's it.Actually, he was a joke character.
Not every character has to promote something, though I agree Dr. Mario was pretty much useless.Dr. Mario - what was the point of him in Melee? Were they trying to promote something there? Was there a GBA game I missed? Or a GC game?
2) Jigglypuff: A random Pokemon.
Umm... wasn't metal gear one of the first games on a Nintendo System? I believe Snake "was" a Nintendo character, he was just developed under a different company after they bought the Metal Gear series. And to add, Marth isn't cartoon-ish, neither is Ike. Ganondorf is even less cartoon-ish then those two. But I do believe Snake shouldn't have been in the game, if he was in, where are all the other 3rd Party characters that everyone else wanted. I say if you add two, you should and could add the rest.4. Snake (I can see I'll get killed for this but including snake means you cud almost have any character at all coz he's not nintendo like, Sonic looks more cartoony (nintendoey) so he's alrite)
Uh, no. Mew could learn any TM/HM, but that's all he had over Mewtwo. Mewtwo has far better stats (especially in Special Atk and HP). Tournament organizers debate about unbanning Mew because he's not that powerful compared to the other legendaries which have also been banned (Mewtwo included). Mew was the rarest and most elusive, but Mewtwo was stronger.Mew is better.
Thinking about it, wouldnt he be an interesting addition?
Though i got to admit, i think it was Jesus who said it, Scyther would rock, even though they had to replace Lucario /snif/ /snif/
What? Krystal is understandable. I've heard Slippy being tossed around. But Peppy?Wolf - should've put in Peppy
Woah, thanks for correcting me. I actually meant Slippy >.>What? Krystal is understandable. I've heard Slippy being tossed around. But Peppy?
Are you sure? Wasnt he stronger because he was the original one.Uh, no. Mew could learn any TM/HM, but that's all he had over Mewtwo. Mewtwo has far better stats (especially in Special Atk and HP). Tournament organizers debate about unbanning Mew because he's not that powerful compared to the other legendaries which have also been banned (Mewtwo included). Mew was the rarest and most elusive, but Mewtwo was stronger.
It's ok, it's just that you found something wrong with every point I made :/ Maybe I just didn't put my arguement well enoughNo no, I wasnt flaming you. Man, Im definitly not a flamer.
I basically made an argument, I wasnt trying to be rude or anything.
If it did come out rude, I apologize for that.
1: Snake is owned By Konami, a third party company, who the creator of the Metal Gear series, Kojima, works for.Umm... wasn't metal gear one of the first games on a Nintendo System? I believe Snake "was" a Nintendo character, he was just developed under a different company after they bought the Metal Gear series. And to add, Marth isn't cartoon-ish, neither is Ike. Ganondorf is even less cartoon-ish then those two. But I do believe Snake shouldn't have been in the game, if he was in, where are all the other 3rd Party characters that everyone else wanted. I say if you add two, you should and could add the rest.
(Bomberman, NiGHTS, etc. etc.)
because pichus a peice of crapI want them all to stay. Why would you remove them? <3
One word. Exposure. If people like the character, they might be inclined to buy one of their gamesSheik: I'll keep this short since people probably won't read this anyway. Sheik appeared in one game (not counting Melee and Brawl), and that's LoZ: OoT. A great game, yeah, but she hasn't made an appearance in over 10 years. Again, Nintendo included a character from one of their franchises that's quite obscure. It's like making Mudkip playable, might please some fans, but more will go "what was that for?"
Those are my thoughts.
If that's what you think, then you should want Pikachu, Jigglypuff, Pichu, and Lucario gone. Mewtwo makes more sense than those hacks. Pokemon Trainer and Mewtwo are the only Pokemon characters who play major roles in the games. The others are all just optional party members/common enemies. Besides, Pokemon Trainer is the only Pokemon character who got in for a reason other than anime popularity.Mewtwo: When I was a kid, I of course watched Pokemon The Movie 2000, featuring Mewtwo as the villain. Melee came out a year later, with Mewtwo in tow. The reason they put Mewtwo in, at least in my opinion, is to ride off of the popularity of Pokemon at the time (see: Jiggs in 64). Also, he's a bad character.
Those are my thoughts.
☆ lol, you know that Metal Gear first game was on Nintendo before it games became mostly Play Station, also Metal Gear Soild had a game for the GC as well, (I won't get into details). But I'll agree that he's not Smash Bros material to be in this game. =P ☆snake! not even nintendo or sega?? but hes in the game, maybe i dont like him cause he counters game and watch
It's first port was to the Nintendo. The Metal Gear series started on the msx. People get this information wrong way too often. It was on a Nintendo system before the Playstations, but that's it.☆ lol, you know that Metal Gear first game was on Nintendo before it games became mostly Play Station, also Metal Gear Soild had a game for the GC as well, (I won't get into details). But I'll agree that he's not Smash Bros material to be in this game. =P ☆
I'm confused, who are the 5 characters that shouldn't be in the smash bros. series?Pit shouldnt have been in it, Coz he only has two games and they're really old.
Jigglypuff shouldnt have been in it. Too many Pokemon, and he's not even a good one, nor is he as important to the series as Pikachu. Pikachu and Pokemon Trainer is all we need, and Lucario isnt too bad.... (mewtwos better xD )
Ness. They should have replaced him with Lucas, instead of having both.
People like Shiek. You can't have one without the other. Besides, Zelda would suck without her.Sheik: I'll keep this short since people probably won't read this anyway. Sheik appeared in one game (not counting Melee and Brawl), and that's LoZ: OoT. A great game, yeah, but she hasn't made an appearance in over 10 years. Again, Nintendo included a character from one of their franchises that's quite obscure. It's like making Mudkip playable, might please some fans, but more will go "what was that for?"
Uhh... Lots of people have...1) Pit - seriously, who the **** had ever heard of him before this?
Actually, I appreciate the retro characters, although I don't really like playing them. Smash is truly an all-star game, but what's the point when you don't have Nintendo characters from all ages of gaming?
A dumb character who doesn't deserve to be in Smash is Lucario. I knew who it was before Brawl came out because I'd played Pokémon Pearl, but it didn't strike me as a particularly iconic character. Its inclusion seems kinda random. I know it was probably just to promote the lates movie, which stars Lucario as am important character, kinda like how they put Mewtwo in Melee because of the first Pokémon movie, but people actually cared about Mewtwo. It was the last and most powerful legendary Pokémon in the game and it had the number 150. It was pretty iconic in the first game.
you sir, have read my mind ._.1. Pit (too spamy)
2. Toon Link (clone better then original )
3. Ice Climbers (wtf?)
4. Lucario (replaced Mewtwo! )
5. Game and Watch (again wtf?)
And Kirby's Dream Land 3.yes he was. He was in mario kart ds
if I remember correctly, Lucas was supposed to be in 64, but Mother 3 wasn't released yet, so they put Ness in instead. I could be wrong tho...ugggh again?
olimar-nintendo failed by switching ridley with him since they needed more bosses in SSE
lucas-awesome, but just a better ness, so why bother
pit-known fact that most people nevr heard of him. also is unbalanced character
lucario-only in anime, why in game?
ike-just a slower roy who isnt a clone of marth
**** you1. Marth. I hate Marth. Girly voice, nobody knows where the hell he is from. Need I go on?
2. Roy. I just hate this guy. And Fire Emblem. Hate that to. V_V
3. Hmm.....Young Link. Link has had so many copies its ridiculous, why not introduce the Skull Kid?
4. Jigglypuff. Fun character, nice combos in SS64. Just.....dont like it.
5. And Finally, Zelda. I strongly detest Zelda.
So you think.**** you
Fire Emblem is an amazing series
******