Red Arremer
Smash Legend
He still is bad, therefore you would want him to be kicked.I said Link was one of the untouchable 12 so hes going nowhere... you just didnt get my trail of thought.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
He still is bad, therefore you would want him to be kicked.I said Link was one of the untouchable 12 so hes going nowhere... you just didnt get my trail of thought.
Oh yeah I guess he was, though I've only played that game like twice in my entire life. It still doesn't make much sense to me though.yes he was. He was in mario kart ds
And it's final smash turns the screen into unbearable colors as if you just looked away back into reality after playing it for 4 hours.They should make the Virtual Boy a playable character... all it does is trip...
You must have read the thread's title wrong. It says characters that SHOULDN'T be in Smash1. Geno
2. Geno
3. Geno
4. Chuck Norris
5. Geno
Nope, hes nostalgic, cool in general,and i play him decently. Really dont get why hes bottom tierHe still is bad, therefore you would want him to be kicked.
Metal Gear - NES. Did you forget Snakes's origins? Yes you did.Snake. He's not from Nintendo at all, so he shouldn't be included. I understand why they included third party characters, to emphasize the whole point of SSB: that characters from different games are getting together to fight each other. Sonic was an ok choice though, because Sega and Nintendo have been closely linked for some time now.
Fixed.Mewtwo: Had a billion ties to the actual fandom and it was obvious he's immortal due to being (mostly) freaking awesome. His character in representation of Pokemon was the best ever IMO.
-Lucario: Read above. Crappy as **** character and him being added just came out of no where really. Won't be surprised if he's replaced for the next pokemon in a debut movie.
What is jp?diddy, jp, ic, rob and wario with diddy in dead last.
ZSS and Diddy? I'd really like to hear your logic. Those two are at the top of my 'should be in Brawl' list. Hell, I was surprised Diddy wasn't in Melee, and Metroid needed another rep for how popular it is.Ah, yes it should be:
1.) R.O.B
2.) Jiggly
3.) Wolf
4.) Zero Suit
5.) Diddy
How was Mewtwo propoganda for his movie when Melee came out YEARS after his movie was in threatre and had been released on VHS...I don't have anything against these characters, but practically speaking I have to list Jiggz, Mewtwo, Lucario, Pichu
-Jiggz: Only reason I think Jiggz was added was to attract a larger demographic of players. Would be fine if Jiggz actually had any sort of grip on the franchise itself, rather than fan favorite. What confused me even more is that Jiggz got in and not Meowth. Regarding the anime, Pikachu and Meowth were easily the two most common of the entire pokeroster.
-Mewtwo: Shallow propaganda for his movie. Had no ties to the actual fandom and it was obvious he'd die out in 4-5 years due to being (mostly) movie exclusive. His character in representation of Pokemon held no water at all.
-Lucario: Read above. Awesome as **** character but him being added just came out of no where really. Won't be surprised if he's replaced for the next pokemon in a debut movie.
-Pichu: Read Jiggz, but to a more "what the ****" degree.
I can't really think of a 5th one, the rest at least represent their franchise and will continue to do so.
Actually, you did. He started on the MSX, not the NES. Not to mention, his best games are on Sony, so for opinions of him not feeling Nintendo are justfied.Metal Gear - NES. Did you forget Snakes's origins? Yes you did.
Jigglypuff.What is jp?
Mewtwo was the de-facto uber-legendary. Anyone who was around in the heyday of Pokemon RBY knew that. He was pretty iconic as being the most powerful of the 151 original Pokemon.
There was an interview yeeeeeeeears back where they explained why Ganon was a clone of Falcon, saying that he was cut but then had some time, they made a few slight alterations to some existing ones to squeeze a few last characters in and noticed that the discarded Gannondorf's wireframe/body looked a lot like Captain Falcon. They also said that they made Pichu as a joke, making some comment about someone being really good with him in Australia or something. I really wish I could find that interview again![]()
Among other stuff regarding characters:If you do find that interview, please share it![]()
I read the whole thing. Very nice.Among other stuff regarding characters:
http://forum.starmen.net/forum/Stor...ing-a-comprehensive-list-of-unused-characters
I thought this too until I saw that Olimar and Dr. Mario have more in common than Mario and Dr. Mario
2: Dr. Mario - Mario is already in the game, so making Doc a separate character is pointless.
Hes the pre-evo of Pikachu - the mascot of Pokemon, was probably included to represent the then-newly baby Pokemon as M&S Guy said, so I dont see him being random. He had a reason to be included, like EVERY other character.1. Pichu (very random pokemon)
You dont **** around with classics. The whole Game & Watch franchise took place in a completely FLAT world, that means there is no third-dimension. Now why should Mr. G&W be 3D'fied if he came from a 2D world where 3D possibilities does not exist? Mr. G&W originated as a flat character, therefore he should stay as one.2. G&W (I don't mind retro but no remodelling to make him 3D sux D: )
Hes not a 100% clone. And hes freaky? Thats a pretty bad argument if you ask me, lol.3. Toon Link (clone of Link and he's freaky O.o)
That argument makes no sense at all. What exactly makes a character "Nintendo-like"? They must look "cartoony" to be included in Smash? If Nintendo would follow you, only a few characters would be included, possibly not even anyone since game characters who originated as game characters arent cartoons. I suggest having some research, Nintendo isnt all about, in your words, "cartoony"-looking characters you know. Same goes for SEGA.4. Snake (I can see I'll get killed for this but including snake means you cud almost have any character at all coz he's not nintendo like, Sonic looks more cartoony (nintendoey) so he's alrite)
Opinion.5. Dr Mario (Even the fact he was my main in melee his games still suck)
He does fight, look up his moveset on Smashwiki.I wud also have put olimar coz he does no fighting but I'm limited to 5 so...
Wow what's your problem. All I did was state my opinion and you flame me for everything I said lol. I'm not gonna answer all those questions coz I can't be bothered getting into a flame warHes the pre-evo of Pikachu - the mascot of Pokemon, was probably included to represent the then-newly baby Pokemon as M&S Guy said, so I dont see him being random. He had a reason to be included, like EVERY other character.
You dont **** around with classics. The whole Game & Watch franchise took place in a completely FLAT world, that means there is no third-dimension. Now why should Mr. G&W be 3D'fied if he came from a 2D world where 3D possibilities does not exist? Mr. G&W originated as a flat character, therefore he should stay as one.
Hes not a 100% clone. And hes freaky? Thats a pretty bad argument if you ask me, lol.
That argument makes no sense at all. What exactly makes a character "Nintendo-like"? They must look "cartoony" to be included in Smash? If Nintendo would follow you, only a few characters would be included, possibly not even anyone since game characters who originated as game characters arent cartoons. I suggest having some research, Nintendo isnt all about, in your words, "cartoony"-looking characters you know. Same goes for SEGA.
I would say some characters could be more or less Anime-influenced.
Opinion.
He does fight, look up his moveset on Smashwiki.