Nathan Richardson
Smash Ace
And this conversation has quickly given me a headache 'Bayo is the best character in the game!'
'She wouldn't be so good if the players facing her would stop making mistakes!' 'She may be bad but she isn't brawl MK bad!' 'Bayo's ruining the meta! Noone can touch her!'
And on and on, we have this argument EVERY SINGLE TIME BAYONETTA IS BROUGHT UP!!! How long has post-patch Bayo been out?!? How long?!?
If she really can be fought why is she dominating the top 8's in tourneys if not outright winning them? Why does her MU chart look like she has no solid hard counterpicks?
I don't mean to be 'that whiny guy' but whoever doesn't think she isn't the best character in the game or horribly overtuned even with the nerfs needs to wake up and stop fanboying because the tourny results say otherwise!
Do I advocate banning her? Of course not, it'd be stupid of me to do so and every single person before me has said as much.
However, I do believe that the meta is centralizing around her, the meta used to be centralized around cloud but he, at least, has hard solid counterpicks, not to mention the other characters have to be played nearly perfectly to get the results they do.
Tell me, how much room for error does a bayonetta player have compared to other characters? She has one of the best disadvantage states in the game, even her landing lag is something she can easily work around if the previous posts around here are any indication.
You can easily argue that other characters have similar if not identical strengths but...just how many characters is that? Do they lose hard to other MUs that Bayo is good at and are they high to top-tiers? The answer to that should be 'yes and yes' but when I saw the examples of who has an advantage over her in an MU my first thought was 'That's it? They'd need a secondary just to get through the other matches.'
If she isn't the best character in smash 4 with the lowest risk on her moves with the highest reward then please enlighten me because with all these arguments it's hard to tell fact from fiction here.
'She wouldn't be so good if the players facing her would stop making mistakes!' 'She may be bad but she isn't brawl MK bad!' 'Bayo's ruining the meta! Noone can touch her!'
And on and on, we have this argument EVERY SINGLE TIME BAYONETTA IS BROUGHT UP!!! How long has post-patch Bayo been out?!? How long?!?
If she really can be fought why is she dominating the top 8's in tourneys if not outright winning them? Why does her MU chart look like she has no solid hard counterpicks?
I don't mean to be 'that whiny guy' but whoever doesn't think she isn't the best character in the game or horribly overtuned even with the nerfs needs to wake up and stop fanboying because the tourny results say otherwise!
Do I advocate banning her? Of course not, it'd be stupid of me to do so and every single person before me has said as much.
However, I do believe that the meta is centralizing around her, the meta used to be centralized around cloud but he, at least, has hard solid counterpicks, not to mention the other characters have to be played nearly perfectly to get the results they do.
Tell me, how much room for error does a bayonetta player have compared to other characters? She has one of the best disadvantage states in the game, even her landing lag is something she can easily work around if the previous posts around here are any indication.
You can easily argue that other characters have similar if not identical strengths but...just how many characters is that? Do they lose hard to other MUs that Bayo is good at and are they high to top-tiers? The answer to that should be 'yes and yes' but when I saw the examples of who has an advantage over her in an MU my first thought was 'That's it? They'd need a secondary just to get through the other matches.'
If she isn't the best character in smash 4 with the lowest risk on her moves with the highest reward then please enlighten me because with all these arguments it's hard to tell fact from fiction here.