Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well the idea is that if you're stalling (planking, circle camping, homing attack stall, IDC) your opponent can heal themselves with food, and with 1 stock it prevents the opponent from getting a stock lead (and prevents the need for the 300% infinite rule). IDC was never really proven to be broken outside of stalling indefinitely. (and with this ruleset that's no longer a problem)You can still camp and stall with this ruleset, I dun geddit?
IDC is broken whether you stall with it or not.
What I meant was that a player can still stall the whole match, grab some food along the way, and then hit the opponent once with 1 second left on the clock.Well the idea is that if you're stalling (planking, circle camping, homing attack stall, IDC) your opponent can heal themselves with food, and with 1 stock it prevents the opponent from getting a stock lead (and prevents the need for the 300% infinite rule). IDC was never really proven to be broken outside of stalling indefinitely. (and with this ruleset that's no longer a problem)
Idk if low is enough though, might not heal enough damage quick enough. I would use medium.
You know you don't have to attack with down-b...?Well, this ruleset basically just gets rid of the need for arbitrary rules against stalling. You can still camp, but basically it's not as effective. Meta Knight can't hit you if you're on a different platform (or the ledge) or in the air while he's using the IDC. Plus it has a lot of lag if it misses.
Oh and I would assume the 10% handicap is to force players to approach (once one of them heals themselves), as without it, certain characters (Meta Knight) can force a draw. (Start IDC/planking at the beginning of the match)
Yes I know...doesn't change that it's easily avoidable. I don't see it being effective on any stage besides final destination.You know you don't have to attack with down-b...?
You can release while not holding an attack button and it has much less lag.
I think the fact that you don't like this thread serves as concrete proof of how legit this is. I feel even more confident that this thread is awesome. Thanks.I really wish people would stop pulling ideas outta their *** and people start discussing it legit it's legit. Can this thread please be locked. Threads like this shouldn't even be tolerated.
I meant to say like it's legit.Why not? It'snot a troll thread, and this is perfectly legitimate discussion about a viable way to alter the ruleset. What shouldn't be tolerated is closed-mindedness, flaming, and poor grammar. Did I just *gasp* ad hominem?arguably
I am a grammar nazi btw.
You know, it's not that bad of an idea for some alternative fun at tourneys. Don't hate on the whole concept just because it can't replace the main system we have already.Also it's pretty said for people to not be able to exercise the least bit of common sense before they come up with an idea. We don't need to discuss this idea because it's a bad idea. I don't need to sit here and have a 20 page debate about 1 stock with someone else because I know it's a bad idea. I can see it you can see it anyone can see it. Use some common sense and let's not sit here and try to have an intellectually debate about why 1 stcok Matches are good / bad. Use your brain people. But considering this is SWF I'm sure people will continue to dsicuss and deliberate and some people will actually support the idea.
I approve.I meant to say like it's legit.
Here's what you get for being a grammar nazi.
Your argument: This is stupid, why are we looking at this?Also it's pretty sad for people to not be able to exercise the least bit of common sense before they come up with an idea. We don't need to discuss this idea because it's a bad idea. I don't need to sit here and have a 20 page debate about 1 stock with someone else because I know it's a bad idea. I can see it, you can see it, anyone can see it. Use some common sense and let's not sit here and try to have an intellectually debate about why 1 stock Matches are good / bad. Use your brain people. But considering this is SWF I'm sure people will continue to discuss and deliberate and some people will actually support the idea.
First of all, hacking projects are COMPLETELY different from what we're discussing here. We're altering Brawl's rulesets. They're altering Brawl and making something else. We might as well talk about Melee while we're at it.Or we can just have one thread for random idea's pulled out of our *** that will help improve brawl. This thread can be merge with the 1.1 thread and can be merged with brawl+ - project M and whatever other non sense that's people have been doing to the game. We can also throw people ideas for starter stages and what not and whatever BS rule set they want to come up with that. I don't think there needs to be a thread for every random idea someone pulls out there *** nor should it be taken seriously or debated but like I said early this is SWF and this is what you guys do so enjoy. Pretty soon people going to want to start playing out sudden death.....what ever.
Are you replying to me? I never said Ganon's recovery was good or bad. Either way, Ganon can easily live to around 200. <3Lol Ganon's recovery doesn't live until high percents.
Quality post. Now that you brought up all of these good points, I think this idea would never work in a competitive setting.bad troll
noone could honestly take this seriously