Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well played.First off, call him Inui and not Lucas. Second of all, he doesn't suck. He beats good players all the time. Are you referring to that video of Chu brutally *** ****** him? Yeah, well Chu beat me too so do I suck?
You say you think he freaking owns so I mean, that's good. You're the only person who I've heard say he freaking owns though.
It's not nice to lie to people, friend.Keep with Lucas, he is great.
Look at Gimpy, who never won a tournament? What does that prove?I hate when people say "not tourney viable," as if that character can't win a tournament. Of course you can win if you're good enough. Look at Gimpy from Melee.
Does it mean you'll need to be significantly better than your opponents if you play Lucas? Yes, but that's what you sign up for when you play Lucas.
Gimpy openly admits that Bowser is a piece of ****, as are all other low tiers. Tiers exist, get over it.I hate when people say "not tourney viable," as if that character can't win a tournament. Of course you can win if you're good enough. Look at Gimpy from Melee.
I lol'd hard.First off, call him Inui and not Lucas. Second of all, he doesn't suck. He beats good players all the time. Are you referring to that video of Chu brutally *** ****** him? Yeah, well Chu beat me too so do I suck?
You say you think he freaking owns so I mean, that's good. You're the only person who I've heard say he freaking owns though.
These characters may have potential, but there are also other character with even GREATER potential.You can't biase a certain character because of performance.
When placed in the right hands, these characters may have potential.
As for Lucas, me personally, I don't like him. At all.
But does that mean he sucks? No, not at all.
And I agree with 8AngeL8.
Awesome avatar, btw. Hobbes is amazing. =D
no - not every character can win at tournamentsI hate when people say "not tourney viable," as if that character can't win a tournament. Of course you can win if you're good enough. Look at Gimpy from Melee.
Does it mean you'll need to be significantly better than your opponents if you play Lucas? Yes, but that's what you sign up for when you play Lucas.
LMAOFirst off, call him Inui and not Lucas. Second of all, he doesn't suck. He beats good players all the time. Are you referring to that video of Chu brutally *** ****** him? Yeah, well Chu beat me too so do I suck?
You say you think he freaking owns so I mean, that's good. You're the only person who I've heard say he freaking owns though.
Lucas bottom five, kid.incorrect, i was simply asking why sonic is supposedly better...and enough with this inui, what the ****...
yea they do exist its true but dont go by themGimpy openly admits that Bowser is a piece of ****, as are all other low tiers. Tiers exist, get over it.
....which is why they aren't considered "tourney viable" as you would have to be playing at a higher level than your opponent, which isn't hard in small tournies but gets harder and harder as the level of play rises, so no, at the highest levels of play, some characters are not considered "tourney viable". the fact that we can call them "unviable" is because such a high gap in skill difference simply does not exist at the highest levels of play.When the hell did I say tiers don't exist? Read my entire post. I said you'd have to be "significantly better" than your competition. If you want to play a low tier character, go for it. Just realize what you're signing up for.