Beat!
Smash Master
That's a pretty good list.
-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Who are the Top 10 Players of 2012?
- Thread starter Ryobeat
- Start date
Bing
Smash Master
hmm, Im a little iffy on lovage only because of the number of players who could be considered his equal, with that being said, otherwise its a good list.
Tee ay eye
Smash Hero
who could be considered lovage's equal?
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 26,565
No one can compare to the almighty Lovage
Bing
Smash Master
Dont get me wrong, I love Lovage(lol)
I just mean like other people who could feel the 10 seed. Like, Wobbles for instance. Possibly s2j(but no I'd say Lovage is better)
Lovage in that spot is a safe bet, Im just saying its argueable.
I just mean like other people who could feel the 10 seed. Like, Wobbles for instance. Possibly s2j(but no I'd say Lovage is better)
Lovage in that spot is a safe bet, Im just saying its argueable.
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 26,565
No one can compare to the almighty Lovage
Bing
Smash Master
Lovage for #1?
Blu
Smash Apprentice
Lovage is #∞, bro.
Froggy
Smash Champion
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2012
- Messages
- 2,448
- 3DS FC
- 3110-7430-0100
Well naturally the 10th spot on any best 10 list is going to be the most debatable. I do however think that Lovage is slightly better/more consistent than the others who would be a strong candidate for the 10th spot.
Tee ay eye
Smash Hero
No one can compare to the almighty Lovage.
haha hilarious video
ZaXXoR
Smash Journeyman
Bing
Smash Master
Lame troll was lameee
Bing
Smash Master
I approve of this. Tang my first favourite Fox main.
jman > lovage
jesus got a bull*** bracket at apex and had to play me for 25th. had he won our extremely close set he would've cruised to T8 and possibly beaten javi and gotten 5th
rather than viewing tourney results as the end-all, be-all, you guys should look at the brackets people fought through to get there. for example s2j outplacing me at genesis 2 doesn't really count because i easily would've gotten 7th with his bracket (he played MacD for 9th, i played PP)
jesus got a bull*** bracket at apex and had to play me for 25th. had he won our extremely close set he would've cruised to T8 and possibly beaten javi and gotten 5th
rather than viewing tourney results as the end-all, be-all, you guys should look at the brackets people fought through to get there. for example s2j outplacing me at genesis 2 doesn't really count because i easily would've gotten 7th with his bracket (he played MacD for 9th, i played PP)
Tekk
Smash Lord
yeah but pp was sick
Bing
Smash Master
Yeah but PP is still PP...
Shroomed
Smash Master
If my win is slightly discredited for PP being sick, Hax's loss should count for more since PP was indeed really sick.
Divinokage
Smash Legend
You can find all the excuses you want but what happened, happened you can't really change that. (Saying that in general)
how i wish the entire community would jump to my side and john for me every time i underperformed
PP was still top 6 players in the world that day, sick or not. we both played damn well in our tournament set. i'm just gonna assume anyone implying that MacD is as good as a "sick" PP is either from WC or just looking to give me a hard time
PP was still top 6 players in the world that day, sick or not. we both played damn well in our tournament set. i'm just gonna assume anyone implying that MacD is as good as a "sick" PP is either from WC or just looking to give me a hard time
Divinokage
Smash Legend
Bing
Smash Master
Pfft everyone loves Kage.
And I thought everyone loved Hax too.
I call shenanigans.
And I thought everyone loved Hax too.
I call shenanigans.
Ken_Y`
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 1,059
dude you're sexy and you know it
(wiggle wiggle wiggle)In all honesty though top 10 is:
1. Armada (for the time being)
2. Mango ( he will be number 1 shortly)
3. Hbox (fo sho)
4. Javi ( He proved everyone wrong just like armada did, and he beat pp 2-0! pp didnt take a game)
5.PP ( dat falco X( mad scary)
6. M2k ( he beats everyone else besides these players)
7. Hax ( dat falcon is tooooo precise
8.Jman ( dont knock him on results, he still beat javi in the crew battle, and he *****. PERIOD)
9. Amsah ( he beat zhu,jman, and armada! nuff said)
10. KDJ! ( he wouldve gotten top 10 if he didnt play javi)
shroomed,in reality you are in the top 10 but c'mon i cant dog on my man KDJ
hahahahahaah
Divinokage
Smash Legend
Everyone? Certainly not WC...
Screw that I beat his *** in a MM, he's not skilled enough to beat Javi neither was I.dude you're sexy and you know it
In all honesty though top 10 is:
1. Armada (for the time being)
2. Mango ( he will be number 1 shortly)
3. Hbox (fo sho)
4. Javi ( He proved everyone wrong just like armada did, and he beat pp 2-0! pp didnt take a game)
5.PP ( dat falco X( mad scary)
6. M2k ( he beats everyone else besides these players)
7. Hax ( dat falcon is tooooo precise
8.Jman ( dont knock him on results, he still beat javi in the crew battle, and he *****. PERIOD)
9. Amsah ( he beat zhu,jman, and armada! nuff said)
10. KDJ! ( he wouldve gotten top 10 if he didnt play javi)
shroomed,in reality you are in the top 10 but c'mon i cant dog on my man KDJ
hahahahahaah
Shroomed
Smash Master
Hax I think when you're playing 100% you're like 5th or higher.
But consistency is part of skill. You need to work on playing your best all the time man cuz you're REALLY good.
The community likes to john for the golden boys only. (top 5)
But consistency is part of skill. You need to work on playing your best all the time man cuz you're REALLY good.
The community likes to john for the golden boys only. (top 5)
Divinokage
Smash Legend
It's not really about consistency at that point but more because our characters get *****, even if his skill is up to par that difference is apparent. I have been told that several times. As soon as you are off-stage you are dead as Ganon/Falcon.
The Star King
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 9,681
It doesn't matter if Hax's loss to PP would be worse because he was sick (when discussing S2J vs Hax), because S2J lost to a sick PP's Falcon at the same tournament...
Bing
Smash Master
Pfft, they dont even count!
leffen
Smash Champion
lol at jman deserving better.
the only reason hax came far anyway was because M2K forfeit
and seriously, what is this "hax playing at 100%" Vids?
has he ever played as that in tournament? Who has he beat that proves that he even has that level?
Considering how long Hax has been in the top and how many times he has faced top players im amazed at how he has upset so incredibly few
if anything, use lucky, wobbles, axe, chudat and the tons of other players who have and can actually beat people in the top but still place low half of the timeinstead of hyping up the player who always places the same (~8th) just because he plays falcon.
Im thinking that people are defining "playing good" as when Hax does stupidly unnecessary combos/auto combos on floaties and "playing bad" when he doesn't get huge combos
falcon baby
the only reason hax came far anyway was because M2K forfeit
and seriously, what is this "hax playing at 100%" Vids?
has he ever played as that in tournament? Who has he beat that proves that he even has that level?
Considering how long Hax has been in the top and how many times he has faced top players im amazed at how he has upset so incredibly few
if anything, use lucky, wobbles, axe, chudat and the tons of other players who have and can actually beat people in the top but still place low half of the timeinstead of hyping up the player who always places the same (~8th) just because he plays falcon.
Im thinking that people are defining "playing good" as when Hax does stupidly unnecessary combos/auto combos on floaties and "playing bad" when he doesn't get huge combos
falcon baby
The Star King
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 9,681
^So you think peak skill is more important than consistency?
Divinokage
Smash Legend
Nice try Leffen but that's pretty BS.
twizzlerj
Smash Journeyman
from what i have seen this can be a valid response for almost all of leffen's posts
Divinokage
Smash Legend
Bing
Smash Master
Wait what?
So according to you, we should get hype for people who get knocked out 2-3 rounds into bracket but ignore the man consistently placing top 10?
Umm, correct if Im wrong... but that makes no ****ing sense.
But based on your logic, we should cheer for you at North American Nationals and not top 10 players.
kk.
GO LEFFEN :D
So according to you, we should get hype for people who get knocked out 2-3 rounds into bracket but ignore the man consistently placing top 10?
Umm, correct if Im wrong... but that makes no ****ing sense.
But based on your logic, we should cheer for you at North American Nationals and not top 10 players.
kk.
GO LEFFEN :D
JPOBS
Smash Hero
Leffen literally just said hax isn't good because he "only" places top 8 every single time.
lol words fail me.
lol words fail me.
Divinokage
Smash Legend
Well then Leffen is worse because he got 33rd and also got exposed by Fuzzyness in Fox dittos.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 5,493
In Leffen's defense:
He was responding to Shroomed's assertion that Hax could be top 5 or higher when he's playing 100%. What he was trying to say wasn't that we should value peak potential/performance over consistency, but that if you're going to say something like, "Hax could be top five," it'd be better to say that about other players like those he listed who have upset top players, because there is more tournament proof of them having the potential to explode (despite inconsistency), than there is proof for Hax to explode, due to his consistent placing. If that makes sense.
This thread sucks.
He was responding to Shroomed's assertion that Hax could be top 5 or higher when he's playing 100%. What he was trying to say wasn't that we should value peak potential/performance over consistency, but that if you're going to say something like, "Hax could be top five," it'd be better to say that about other players like those he listed who have upset top players, because there is more tournament proof of them having the potential to explode (despite inconsistency), than there is proof for Hax to explode, due to his consistent placing. If that makes sense.
This thread sucks.