• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Which mid-low tier charcter has the most potential?

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
I'll tell you guys right now that until people start using side-b with DK. he won't move anywhere but down.

I've just found out some cool stuff with it and it *can* lead to guaranteed kills but its a little tricky. if DK players can get it down, it'll be amazing and completely change at least the match up with Sheik and Falcon. possibly marth and ganon
 

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
I've experimented a lot with DK, because I main him in 64.


I use Side-B when the situation warrants it, but I've never found anything even slightly metagame changing, care to elaborate?
I'm going to write a guide on what to do in the DK forums in the near future, I'll link you to it when I finish it
 

KingofCereal

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
252
Location
DC
I main DK. I like DK. I think his tier position is just right. It's high enough that people that don't play DK are confused, but I don't think he can go higher. Especially because I think Pikachu has some serious untapped potential.
 

Spyro

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 6, 2011
Messages
639
Location
Gallatin,Tennessee
@KingofCereal: I think most of Pikachu potential has been tapped. I think the only potential he has left is possibly a better match up with Sheik. He does belong in the C tier though IMO.

:phone:
 

KingofCereal

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
252
Location
DC
How to say... Pikachu's potential has been revealed, unlocked, tapped. Axe has shown the world just what can be done. But on a larger scale Pika has not stepped up to that potential. Probably doesn't need to move places either.
 

Bl@ckChris

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
7,443
Location
Greensboro, NC
i feel like GW probably has the most potential that hasn't been seen on a more public scale.

idk if he should be moved up on the tier list or anything, but i feel like that character can do things that i haven't seen it do.

edit: also, i'd take docs recovery over luigis any day. pills make edgeguarding doc so much harder than it should be sometimes.
 

Fregadero

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
389
What? You don't think Marth could be better? It'll just take a really good play, like Sethlon with Roy, or Vman/Leffen with Yoshi, to bring him out of his pitiful placing.
I think Marth is going to continue to stagnate unless someone very talented (who could probably do better with another character of theirs) or some with a new and effective playstyle really starts breathing life into the character.

Don't get me wrong, I'd LOVE that. I'm still pretty new/bad and having a player that compete at the top (I feel m2k's Marth falls under the "has better characters") would be great.

Although I think a SUPER patient/conservative/campy marth could get the job done.

:phone:
 

Jockmaster

Smash Ace
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
872
Location
Athens, GA
I **** ride Ice a lot on these boards, but seriously if any Marth has the potential to break out it's his imo

:phone:
 

KingofCereal

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
252
Location
DC
I like how this discussion has gone from "mid-low tier characters with potential" to Marth. Marth is far from mid-low, and is a great character. I have a feeling he will be relegated to the bench from here on out though. As a secondary that can and will still pull out wins. Look at M2K's Zenith play for an example of what I mean. He switched up Shiek and Marf. Ultimately PP figured out how to beat M2K's Marf, but it did take a while, and it did require PP to try Marf too. Marf is too good to be called crap.
 

VGmasta

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Messages
1,252
Location
West Palm Beach, FL + the Doc Boards!!
NOT Dr Mario...

His hitboxes aren't big enough to keep up. Especially his aerials.
His ground game is tight; nice smash attacks and a good grab game.
But his movement in the air is too slow, and his aerials are beaten too easily.
 

KirbyKaze

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
17,679
Location
Spiral Mountain
If a character moves up in a revolutionary manner, it's probably not gonna be something like DK or Young Link because those kinds of characters have no shield game and unless you're ludicrously better than the opponent they really do lose to loltechspam by competent space animals. And if you're Fox you're also obligated to throw combo them periodically (which isn't really loltechspam but it blends in pretty easily).

As a side note, I don't consider Young Link being better than Link (IMHO) much of an accomplishment. Link and Young Link are still freaking terrible.
 

Divinokage

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
16,250
Location
Montreal, Quebec
The only char I can see do well is G&W out of the lower tier I think. Link and YL, they already did well in the past.. now it's pretty much abysmal lol. But I'd still be willing to MM with Link. =P

Downthrow techchase Up-B.
 

KirbyKaze

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
17,679
Location
Spiral Mountain
Peach is as low as I'm gonna go.

Sheik Fox and Peach are the only characters I really find fun for more than like 10 minutes.
 

Doser

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
572
Location
Lincoln Nebraska
I'm gonna say Pikachu, I know axe has done a lot but from what I can see pikachu seems like it can go farther than all of the other mid tiers besides doc possibly. I think if more good players used pikachu we could at least see different perspectives.


@Doser: lol?
I can't believe you don't understand that posting to tell people you are going to make a post later is just **** posting. How can you be this stupid?
 

ruhtraeel

Smash Ace
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
707
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
G&W seriously ***** lots of people. Huge hitboxes with disjoints and one of the best jabs in the game. Long *** recovery, high priority, etc. He's like a low tier marth. He has all the killing potential he needs, great edgeguarding, great throws although a suck grab range

Roy also has Marth stuff and is faster. So he'll probably never be as good as certain characters unlike g&w but he is still better than a lot of people think.

IMO them two should be at least DK tier,possibly link tier. I think they can hold their own against high tiers much better than Kirby, bowser, dk, pichu, Zelda, and both links.

:phone:
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
Doser wasn't even talking about Roy/G&W... Were you annoyed that no one was arguing with you?

What is so good about G&W's jab? Also his shield is awful. Also his approach is predictable and unsafe. Also he is feather-weight. You can't just look at a character's strengths.
 

The Star King

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
9,681
I'm not sure I agree (if comparing G&W to other low tiers), but I don't want to argue because it'll turn into us both throwing out vague general statements about the character to try and cover up the fact that we actually don't know much about the character (relative to the higher tiers) despite us trying to pretend we do - the way low tier discussion always works in Melee Discussion
 

ruhtraeel

Smash Ace
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
707
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
I was arguing more for the sake of trying to legit bump him up on the tier list

OK yeah his approach isn't that good but you can always do any aerial to jab

And his featheriness helps him not get ***** as hard as someone like DK

:phone:
 

j00t

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
2,194
Location
North AL
What is so good about G&W's jab? Also his shield is awful. Also his approach is predictable and unsafe. Also he is feather-weight. You can't just look at a character's strengths.
Isn't the point of this thread to find strengths in weaker characters to bring out their "potential"? I'm pretty sure that's what this thread is about. But according to Doser I'm an idiot so I don't know any better.

I think G&W has potential because one of his main weaknesses (lack of shield) can be overcome with good use of his tilts, specifically his utilt. This move is a key defensive tool for beating a fox or falco nair/dair on the spot. It requires better spacing than, say, Marth utilt, but it can lead into more utilts or even a grab, which is one of G&W's greatest strengths.

@Grim Tuesday: G&W's jab is a great tool to interrupt moves that you couldn't interrupt otherwise, and it's main use is that it leads into a grab. G&W's grab game is seriously really good, and the more chances you get to grab an opponent, the better.

I think the main thing holding G&W back is his susceptibility to combos and techchasing. He gets ****ed up hard by these. His tech options are awful, he gets comboed really easily, and he dies really early. His recovery also isn't the best... it goes a good distance but you can hit him out of it pretty easily.
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
If you have a character with one good move who is bad at everything else, you can't say he has "potential" because of that one good move.

Game & Watch is AWFUL defensively (shield, rolls, tech-rolls and weight) and his offensive abilities certainly aren't on-par with the top tier and most of upper mid tier.
 

j00t

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
2,194
Location
North AL
I'm not claiming that utilt is his only good move, i'm saying that utilt and his other tilts can be used to overcome one of his main defensive flaws, which means that he has potential to be better than he appears to be.
 

Эикельманн [РУС]

Banned via Administration
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
5,263
Location
Orlando/Владивосток
I'm not sure I agree (if comparing G&W to other low tiers), but I don't want to argue because it'll turn into us both throwing out vague general statements about the character to try and cover up the fact that we actually don't know much about the character (relative to the higher tiers) despite us trying to pretend we do - the way low tier discussion always works in Melee Discussion
HAHAHAHAHA this post is so perfect
 
Top Bottom