Deathcarter
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 1,358
Note: I feel like I might be sleeping on Greninja but I want to see more of what top players can do with the frog.
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Thing about Ike is that he can directly challenge a lot of hitboxes in the game with a usable ground game.I don't know how I feel about Ike but I do feel like he's bottom of high tier or at the top of mid-tier, but that really depends on how he performs at top level against the top tiers if he gets the chance anyway since that's the most important aspect at nationals/majors. I believe Ike struggles against
- I believe that Mr.R / ZeRo has a nice advantage for them if they face any Ike since sheik can exploit Ike options very nicely.
- I honestly believe that Zero Suit rekts Ike at Top level, I mean we already know how Nairo (ZSS) does against big / heavy characters .
- I can see Ike doing decently well against Rosa but as we all know Dabuz is a fortress and I can also see how Ike can struggle against Rosa.
- The only Pikachu that gets top placing is Esam and I don't even want think about how that can turn-out
- I believe he will struggle with these characters the most at Top Level due to all the aforementioned characters having a more threatening neutral, better disadvantage and a better advantage state against Ike. 3 of these 4 characters are also highly mobile and have faster attacks against Ike allowing him to be overwhelmed much more easily then them being overwhelmed by him. Not trying to say Ike is bad or anything but like most characters who have nearly a worse everything compared to the top tiers they will tend to struggle against them in the whole spectrum of the top tiers.This also give reason as to why every Major/National consists mostly of top tiers in Top 8 or lowered tiered characters such as Donkey Kong or Pac-man with higher tiered secondaries to back them up. Even Fatality who had an amazing run at Smash con was shut down by
and especially by
/: which is why later on down the line I expect for players to pick up secondaries to help their mains against their really bad MU with a top tier(s) if they want to win that is.
It's pretty easy for gunner but really boring if you want to play it optimally.Fixed it.
Jk. In all seriousness, I can see it being in gunner's favor. Gunner's fair could be a problem for Luigi too. Gunner has a good offstage edgeguarding game with the projectiles you mentioned, which is good because Gunner doesn't have to commit at all to use them from the stage. So Cyclone wont screw you over.
The Gunner has to play the neutral very well in order to beat Luigi. I can't put a number on the matchup. It's rarely played so take this theorycraft with a grain of salt.
West Michigan does not have a PR. They only have 3 possibly 4 players that can compete over East. Meanwhile, while we have a 10 man PR, we have another group of players who are all right on the border of being PRed that are similar skill to myself.Hmm... That's probably the same in Rice and Trevonte's situation. Rice seems to like Dr. Mario, but his Fox is his best character while Trevonte likes Palutena (and Captain Falcon), but Sheik is his best character. Ito counts, right? He likes Meta Knight, but Diddy was his best character when Diddy reigned. Now Diddy's not insane anymore and Meta Knight's good, so yay, a win-win situation. Does west Michigan have a PR? The PR thread: http://smashboards.com/threads/smash-4-power-rankings-directory-project.401710/, would be interested since some states like CA is split into several parts: NorCal, SoCal, and San Diego.
This. DK's ****ty neutral really helps balance his ridiculous grab reward. And his ****ty disadvantage gives him incentive to play safe.Also I think DK is the perfectly designed heavy hitter, and it's only possible with rage mode.
His BS combos mostly only work while he has medium/little rage, but his neutral is so poor that he can't really help it in most MUs. If he's getting those combos it's because he's straight outplaying them. (Or lost his stock and got a grab during the fresh one =p)
He's still kind of silly but I hope to see more of the heavy hitters/bad neutrals given incentive to play conservative/efficiently rather than take risks the entire time because of the rage mode cushion. (Looking at you luigi)
Speaking of DK's cargo uthrow to uair, if any character deserves to get cheese such as that it's characters like DK who struggle getting in, but in general those sort of tools are really dangerous for a character's design. Is there really any good reason for DK to do anything else than shield and run around fishing for grabs now when both him and the opponent are below 90%? Diddy became a lot more interesting when his dthrow to uair was essentially obliterated, but now they're taking the easy route and buffing the worse characters by giving them ridiculous setups like that.
There really are some poor (definitely a matter of opinion here) character designs in Smash 4, although other Smash games have their fair share of those. Sheik deals very little damage per hit and takes forever to kill the opponent but theoretically has better odds of winning just about every situation compared to just about any other character. You may argue that this is an interesting design because of how extreme it is, but to that I say think about all the characters who have bad neutral; they cannot win the matchup because their odds of winning neutral are so small it will realistically almost never happen. Luigi is similar but in a different way; you either keep him out and win or you get grabbed 3 times and lose a stock.
Then we have the crew of a little bit less polarizing although still quite extreme characters like ZSS, Falcon, Wario and Lucario who in certain situations can simply take out your stock out of a single conversion or even a single hit well below even half the % where you would usually expect to die. I personally have no trouble with this though, seeing how I main two characters from among them, because they capitalize on mistakes and reads which are player related attributes rather than something static that gets decided in the character selection screen (plus death combos and airdodge read kills are competitively hype).
Anyway I hope they do something else to Sheik than reduce her damage to fix the problems she creates. Not sure what they could do to Luigi though besides dthrow's utility being nerfed, but he needs to be given something in return for his neutral game. That said they decided to do the opposite; increase his fireball endlag and do nothing about his throws while buffing the up b so he has an even stronger confirm off of dthrow once people start doing that.
EDIT: Forgot to mention Little Mac. Shoutouts to the worst character design in the game with superarmor on every smash attack and the best ground game hands down. You either throw out an attack at the wrong time and die literally in 3 hits, or you manage to grab him before then and don't screw up the edgeguard. If you've played versus a good Mac you understand.
Pit's arrows keep you from charging your Fspecial, Dspecial pushes you away from the ledge while keeping Pit safe. It's not even hard to do. And Dark Pit has some potential in beating out Aether, but I haven't went too deep into that.Not really? His worst MU is Sheik at 40-60. SM has taking a set off of VoiD, we do have proof that its certainly a winnable MU.
Sonic loses to Ike. I think Static Manny having to go off of Sonic when going up against Ryo should say it all.
Ike most likely beats Rosalina. Not by very much mind you, I'm talking like 55-45. Its the fact that he kills Luma so easily that gives us the edge. Large number of other top tiers are in the 55-45 or 45-55 range.
Pit doesn't really stuff us on recovery. He'll tack on some extra damage for sure, but the arrows aren't going to keep us from recovering. Have yet to hear of an Ike having difficulty getting back when facing against Pit so the Side B ain't doing as much as it would appear on paper either.
Ike is reliable now. He is very much a showcase of your abilities in fundamentals, almost to an extreme point. Only Eruption can really be called cheesy. Everything else relies solely on your ability to fight in all areas. If you're good at all areas, you can reliably take out just about anyone regardless of character. If you have an area you're weak in, Ike will likely magnify that fact and the opponent will easily pick up on it. That's kinda why a lot of starting Ikes struggle badly against Sonic even though we have the edge for example: you've got to get good at sticking to the right moves in order to beat Sonic. If you don't, you'll get run over very quickly and very badly.
I should have said after 1 aerial since in theory, you can juggle people indefinitely...If you're doing DK's max damage, you need to include Ike's footstool setup from dthrow, which is guaranteed and tournament-proven.
Hm? Non-guaranteed damage shouldn't be counted, unless I read it wrong.I should have said after 1 aerial since in theory, you can juggle people indefinitely...
I meant like after 1 move, DK can do X amount of damage and in contrast, after 1 move, Ike can do X amount of damage. So, Luigi can get the usual ~30% from D-throw, but after 1 move he can get at most 20% from a D-throw (6%) to Bair (14%). There's also the 20% aerial Super Jump Punch, but that's not exactly guaranteed. In a guaranteed chain, that's after multiple moves that rack up damage. I don't think DK can do that, but considering he can get that much damage after 1 move from a guaranteed setup, it's pretty insane. Am I making any sense?Hm? Non-guaranteed damage shouldn't be counted, unless I read it wrong.
The footstool stuff is important to note since it really helped advance Ike's metagame and most of the top Ike players are using it regularly.
So I'll make explanations for as much characters as I can. I can't put one for every character since not only would that take for ever but it would also take up the writing limit for this post if there's one. If death is still my punishment then I will embrace it(Not being literal here)PERSONAL TIER LISTS (without openly justifying themselves and responding properly to questions and critique) is punishable by DEATH.
Speaking of matchups ness only has 4 bad matchups out of 55 character's those being Sheik, Rosalina(as mentioned before), Sonic, and (arguably)Luigi. Beside's those 4 character's who else really beats ness?Yeah...but i'd like to point out that Rosa vs. Ness isn't even -that- bad, probably a +2/ 60-40 Rosa's favor because they both go even in neutral (Ness flat out kills a lot earlier though) and Ness does really dirty things to Rosa when she recovers. TBH I feel like the only reason I destroy Ness players so much is because they see me and psych themselves out, realistically a good Ness can avoid the GP edgeguards because I only get them if the Ness makes one big mistake or I get a hard read.
(Better
NERFBUFF Greninja): Before I begin with Greninja I would just like to say R.I.P better nerf greninja jokes. Yeah it maybe too late but whatever. The buffs that greninja has recieved are just maginificent. His down throw can actually combo now, water shurikens gotten a startup decrease, fast falled nair can now setup into fair for a kill, and he has better footstool combos. Like peach though he doesn't have that much representation outside of teichi and Amsa which could prove to be a problem for his viability.
[/Spoiler]
Well what do you guys think? is it accurate or am I just full of it. Feel free to discuss this
My mistake. I totally forgot Ninja link forgot mains greninja.
- N-Air always could combo into F-Air, hell, N-Air was never changed at any point.
- NinjaLink wins tournaments with Greninja as well
- D-Throw -> Footstools are actually more unreliable than we first thought and are easier to get out of than the N-Air combos.
- You spelled Techei wrong if that's who you're refering to
- It was already stated in this very thread that Greninja actually has quite a bit of representation in Europe, we don't get to see much of it but it exists.
- Thank god the jokes are dying.
idkSeriously Slav how do you win with this character?
Well you gotta consider that this list is not in order and since bottom tier only has Jiggly puff and zelda theirs a good chance that D3 might be bottom 5.idk
maybe i'm just good
Oh and I don't necessarily disagree with DDD being bad, comparatively to the rest of the cast at least. His placing in your tier list is certainly plausible. In fact, I'm happy to see him outside of bottom 5 for once lol.
I'd just like to point out that rep isn't really meaningful if it's not high level representation. I doubt there's any significant rep of Greninja in EU. Whenever I hear anything out of the EU scrne I don't hear about greninja. I've seen people say the region isn't as strong as compared to the US. In the brawl days I remember Gluttony Leon and Mr.R were the best players over there and it serms like Mr.R is the only one that's traveling. I know there's a couple of EU people here so they can correct me if I'm wrong.
- N-Air always could combo into F-Air, hell, N-Air was never changed at any point.
- NinjaLink wins tournaments with Greninja as well
- D-Throw -> Footstools are actually more unreliable than we first thought and are easier to get out of than the N-Air combos.
- You spelled Techei wrong if that's who you're refering to
- It was already stated in this very thread that Greninja actually has quite a bit of representation in Europe, we don't get to see much of it but it exists.
- Thank god the jokes are dying.
Greninja already has 2 top players playing him even if you don't count Europe (NinjaLink and aMSa) which is already more than other top characters like Pikachu and even Mario I think. Even if we discount Europe (which is hard to say much about because we just don't get to see much of it) it's already good representation.I'd just like to point out that rep isn't really meaningful if it's not high level representation. I doubt there's any significant rep of Greninja in EU. Whenever I hear anything out of the EU scrne I don't hear about greninja. I've seen people say the region isn't as strong as compared to the US. In the brawl days I remember Gluttony Leon and Mr.R were the best players over there and it serms like Mr.R is the only one that's traveling. I know there's a couple of EU people here so they can correct me if I'm wrong.
You do realize that pikachu and mario have Ally and Esam repping them right? Even if those are the only reps they've shown way more than greninja. I also don't agree with what you're saying about them being top players. But that's just semantics.Greninja already has 2 top players playing him even if you don't count Europe (NinjaLink and aMSa) which is already more than other top characters like Pikachu and even Mario I think. Even if we discount Europe (which is hard to say much about because we just don't get to see much of it) it's already good representation.
I've heard of someone called Eddy in Europe that supposedly does well with Greninja for what it's worth.
And while we're at this topic, I'm just gonna say I'm very amused that Greninja is a popular character in France. Such patriotism.
He's more of a Falcon main these days to be honest.I've heard of someone called Eddy in Europe that supposedly does well with Greninja for what it's worth.
Apart from the very, very glaring flaw that Lucina is a whopping 20 (holy shіt TWENTY) places below Marth, your decision to order your list from A to F is kinda dumb. That implies a difference in viability that just isn't there. We've got a couple of obvious top tiers and a fairly well established idea of who the high tiers are. Then there's the huge middle tier chunk followed by a small selection of characters who are currently considered legitimately bad, with Zelda, Dedede and Samus being the staples in that category.tier list
NewsflashEsam is thinking of picking up yoshi so that could help our dinosaur out a bit.
At that point it becomes more of a question of whether it's the character or the player that's winning if it's only one person who's carrying the results.You do realize that pikachu and mario have Ally and Esam repping them right? Even if those are the only reps they've shown way more than greninja. I also don't agree with what you're saying about them being top players. But that's just semantics.
You make a very strong point. Mid tier really does take up a huge chunk of the cast but the reason why I did this in the first place is because of the fact of I honestly didn't know how else to order them. I thought making a C and C- tier would have alot of people questioning why is character x lower then character y. If I were to make another tier list I might take your advice on putting in only 4 tiers this time.Apart from the very, very glaring flaw that Lucina is a whopping 20 (holy shіt TWENTY) places below Marth, your decision to order your list from A to F is kinda dumb. That implies a difference in viability that just isn't there. We've got a couple of obvious top tiers and a fairly well established idea of who the high tiers are. Then there's the huge middle tier chunk followed by a small selection of characters who are currently considered legitimately bad, with Zelda, Dedede and Samus being the staples in that category.
You could easily condense your list into a mere 4 tiers. As of now only the Mid tier might warrent a distinction between B+ and B-.
Newsflash
Lucina isn't bad, but until Nintendo patches her out of Marth's shadow, she is going to remain a more or less redundant character.Okay. Maybe I'm just ridiculous as of now but I think the only time when Lucina is not bad is when people stop comparing her to Marth.