Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I seriously didn't think anyone could be that dense.
My point is that you voting for mafia by no means clears you. The only thing to do is look at your posts and the content within them, not any connections with mafia you may or may not have formed. And those don't paint you in such a favorable light.
I attacked you, and you responded with a counter-attack and an FOS. That's basically the definition of Oh-my-gosh-you-suck, except you FOS'd instead of voting.
You can't say my reasoning is inconsistent if multiple people have agreed with it.
Yes, and in your example you had you and EE starting the Chibo lynch and me following, which was not that case. Look over your post.
Yes, the content of my posts. My content says I did not like how Chibo was coasting and responded to pressure. I posted saying I wasn't certain of TPK and Moronik. My posts pressured Xonar at the end of Day whatever. My posts and their pressure were virtually nullified Day 3 when I was voteblocked. I've posted my reasons for Macman and, when seeing the other side of the argument was stronger, posted that I thought it was the case. Nit picking posts in a game that has a 48 hour post deadline that don't have great content is biased. Most of Roxy's posts seem to be fickle wavering (which I have pointed out) but apparently that isn't a problem. For the longest time EE just asked people questions and never responded in full until now but that was never a problem. If you want to find a problem in some one's posts you will, and you're leaning against me.
SO as I said earlier, if I feel your attack is in line with being an indy attack on town, I therefore cannot say anything about it because it's OMGUS and therefore not substantial? No, that is not the case at all. It's not when I say something, it's what I say. I laid out my reasoning but you seem to excited that it was a counterpoint and just labeled it OMGUS.
That is not logical; if multiple people are inconsistent then they can all still agree with each other in that inconsistency. If I believe 2+1 = 10 and you believe 3+0 = 2 then nothing is stopping us from both agreeing 6+6 = 7.
Okay, you win the semantical nitpick. But you get the point.
Could you please direct the post in which you say that? The original voting post says nothing of the sort, and I don't recall you ever elaborating on your suspicion.
A little pressure. Not nearly as much pressure as we've seen EE drop on people throughout the game.
I disagree that being unable to vote nullifies your posts and pressure. A single vote is hardly something to fear. It's the bandwagon you should fear, and you start a bandwagon with a case against someone, not just a vote.
Then why are you doing it? You've nitpicked my example, despite it being quite clear what I meant.
Roxy is a new player. New players tend to waver a good bit. I know I was easily swayed in my first game.
No, you're free to attack me if you please. However, I did similar stuff with Roxy and Chibo (if you care to go back and look), and you didn't have a problem then. Another interesting thing is that a similar thing happened back in D2: I attacked you, and subsequently rose on your scumlist. (EE makes note of this in his giant post, actually) See a pattern here?
Perhaps not, but 3 people are far more likely to get the same right answer than the same wrong answer.
The rebuttal wasn't to attack you (as I think you're town), but to show that some of the reasoning you put in to specify how something I did may be indy was actually done by you or other people and can also be viewed as a town action. The easiest way to do that is to show if you are one of the people that has a conflicting view about it: if I use Roxy as an example then it is much easier to say "Well, Roxy was playing indy'ish there but maybe Roxy is indy". If it's you then it is proof (if you are town and proof you have to follow along even if you are not) that that action can be made by a town and isn't necessarily a deductive portal into the mind of an indy.
This is what I want to see from Virg though. Who's the play and why are they a better option than yourself?
Having to rewrite my answer due to site maintenance...
And why would that be?Wouldn't mind hammer at this point.
Hey Virg, you never answered my most recent post like you promised.
Okay, you win the semantical nitpick. But you get the point.
Could you please direct the post in which you say that? The original voting post says nothing of the sort, and I don't recall you ever elaborating on your suspicion.
A little pressure. Not nearly as much pressure as we've seen EE drop on people throughout the game.
I disagree that being unable to vote nullifies your posts and pressure. A single vote is hardly something to fear. It's the bandwagon you should fear, and you start a bandwagon with a case against someone, not just a vote.
Then why are you doing it? You've nitpicked my example, despite it being quite clear what I meant.
Roxy is a new player. New players tend to waver a good bit. I know I was easily swayed in my first game.
No, you're free to attack me if you please. However, I did similar stuff with Roxy and Chibo (if you care to go back and look), and you didn't have a problem then. Another interesting thing is that a similar thing happened back in D2: I attacked you, and subsequently rose on your scumlist. (EE makes note of this in his giant post, actually) See a pattern here?
