What, were you trying to get me blamed for it because I advocated killing him?Smashman, you were our target to kill the first night, but Gotmink didn't agree with it so he switched our target to Eor. *Facepalm*
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
What, were you trying to get me blamed for it because I advocated killing him?Smashman, you were our target to kill the first night, but Gotmink didn't agree with it so he switched our target to Eor. *Facepalm*
I wasn't near death, Eor mistook my hint and thought I was a elendira the transexual and got my lynched. But oh well, at least I helped prove you were townie DF.Whenever you're about to die like that, why hide your role?
It was way overpowered. I'm sorry, it was a pretty good game in most ways, but that was one aspect that I think you should have reconsidered. Just because you planned something out doesn't mean that your plan was a good one.I find that ironic coming from someone who was himself night immune. I didn't think the immunity in and of itself was broken (bulletproof townies aren't exactly a rarity on other sites), though I would agree when combined with the name claim, it was a tough role to beat.
I thought that the fact that he lied about his role could have benefited you guys a little bit, and the Vash as an independent argument did have some nice backing. After all, night immunity pretty much screams independent/godfather to most people. The fact that he couldn't hammer either could have caused him more problems in an endgame consisting of more than one anti-town member.
Yeah, Eor had a strong role, but I planned it that way purposely. I definitely don't think it was overpowered though.
From what I've seen in this game and the other game that I've followed (South Park Mafia II), he seems the best to me. You're free to make your own judgments of course, but he made more of an impression on me than either of the other players you listed.I dont think Eor is the best. Hes one of the greats, but I think that Frozen and Liggy beat him out for that title.
Fixed. Sorry about that xD.oh, just so you know, my name's Yggdrasil325, not Vggdrasil325. The tail of the y is cut off by the underline.
I thought you played very well for most of the game, although I think night killing me was a mistake, because it made everyone really suspicious of you. I probably would have been lynched anyway, and everyone knew it.I am so dissappointed, I feel like if me and eor had duked it out point for point I would have won, cause we were almost on an even playing field in terms role believeability and I had been writing my arguments against him for like 3 days prior.
I really thought I was gonna win.
In the event that neither side can win due to the fact that they are unable to kill one another no matter how many times the game goes to night, the game ends in a tie.And there's 1 bulletproof on each side.... what woulda happened if it was just Eor and spam left?
And... what's Occam's Razor?
Yes, I'm well aware of the concept and I fully understand it. However, there are other elements to take into account besides the simplicity of the possible answers.As for Occam's Razor, I believe its the idea that the simplest answer is usually the correct one.
In the scenario Camo-man gave, wouldn't the mafia win the game? I thought the mafia automatically won the game as soon as their numbers were equal or greater than that of the rest of the players, whatever the abilities of those players might be.In the event that neither side can win due to the fact that they are unable to kill one another no matter how many times the game goes to night, the game ends in a tie.
Well, yeah. I'm pretty sure you understand it, but just to explain for everyone, a more correct version of occam's razor is "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity", or basically "the answer with the fewest assumptions is probably right", or even just "The simplest explanation that covers all the facts."Yes, I'm well aware of the concept and I fully understand it. However, there are other elements to take into account besides the simplicity of the possible answers.
This runs against the concept of Occam's Razor as Eor explained it. The actual usage of the Razor is a bit more complicated than what Eor outlined, and would actually allow for outside evidence to be considered.
Anyhow, as I said, the simplest explanation was for Eor to be an independent. It explained almost everything that Eor had done during the course of the game (and most of what had happened in the game) with the fewest assumptions possible. Thus, it was the perfect "Occam's Razor" explanation, except for one thing - there was one major piece of evidence against it. This was Rem's proven affiliation with the town.
Therefor, what I was saying holds. The simplest explanation is not always correct, nor is necessarily even the most likely to be correct. Occam's Razor is a valuable tool, but it is not meant to be used in the absence of other types of logic or evidence.